Department of Health Management & Policy, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI 48103-2029, USA.
J Public Health Policy. 2013 Aug;34(3):375-87. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2013.18. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
In 2011, the Australian Government passed landmark legislation requiring tobacco manufacturers to adopt 'plain packaging', a government-mandated design standardized across all brands of tobacco products. In response, plain packaging policy in Australia has faced multiple, simultaneous challenges from a global, well-resourced industry able to use all available fora to seek redress. Generalizing from the Australian experience, we analyze four types of challenges to plain packaging from the tobacco industry. We characterize three ways in which industry questions public health policies through international trade and investment law, on: (i) the intent or purpose of the policy; (ii) the economic consequences of it; and (iii) the regulatory authority behind it. We make recommendations and suggest that public health policymakers can know with some precision what attacks will be launched on tobacco control policies, and prepare their strategies and legislation accordingly.
2011 年,澳大利亚政府通过了具有里程碑意义的立法,要求烟草制造商采用“平装”,即政府强制要求所有烟草产品品牌采用标准化设计。作为回应,澳大利亚的平装政策面临着来自全球资源丰富的烟草业的多重、同时的挑战,这些企业能够利用所有可用的论坛寻求补救。我们从澳大利亚的经验中推断出,烟草业对平装政策提出了四种类型的挑战。我们描述了行业通过国际贸易和投资法对公共卫生政策提出质疑的三种方式:(i) 政策的意图或目的;(ii) 政策的经济后果;以及 (iii) 政策背后的监管权力。我们提出了建议,并指出公共卫生政策制定者可以大致了解针对烟草控制政策的攻击将从何而来,并相应地准备他们的策略和立法。