Essentia Health, Ada, MN 56510, USA.
J Athl Train. 2013 Jul-Aug;48(4):522-7. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.3.17. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
To critically analyze published literature to determine the effectiveness of myofascial release therapy as a treatment for orthopaedic conditions.
We searched the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Academic Search Premier, Cochrane Library, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), with key words myofascial release, myofascial release therapy, myofascial release treatment, musculoskeletal, and orthopedic. No date limitations were applied to the searches.
Articles were selected based upon the use of the term myofascial release in the abstract or key words. Final selection was made by applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria to the full text. Studies were included if they were English-language, peer-reviewed studies on myofascial release for an orthopaedic condition in adult patients. Ten studies were eligible.
Data collected were number of participants, condition being treated, treatment used, control group, outcome measures and results. Studies were analyzed using the PEDro scale and the Center for Evidence-Based Medicine's Levels of Evidence Scale.
Study scores on the PEDro scale ranged from 6 of 10 to 8 of 10. Based on the Levels of Evidence Scale, the case studies (n = 6) were of lower quality, with a rank of 4. Three of the 4 remaining studies were rated at 2b, and the final study was rated at 1b.
The quality of studies was mixed, ranging from higher-quality experimental to lower-quality case studies. Overall, the studies had positive outcomes with myofascial release, but because of the low quality, few conclusions could be drawn. The studies in this review may serve as a good foundation for future randomized controlled trials.
批判性分析已发表文献,以确定肌筋膜松解疗法治疗骨科疾病的有效性。
我们搜索了以下电子数据库:MEDLINE、CINAHL、学术搜索高级版、 Cochrane 图书馆和物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro),使用的关键词是肌筋膜松解、肌筋膜松解疗法、肌筋膜松解治疗、肌肉骨骼和骨科。搜索未对时间限制。
根据摘要或关键词中使用肌筋膜松解一词选择文章。通过将纳入和排除标准应用于全文,最终选择文章。如果是关于肌筋膜松解治疗成人患者骨科疾病的英语同行评审研究,则纳入研究。有 10 项研究符合条件。
收集的数据包括参与者人数、治疗的疾病、使用的治疗方法、对照组、结果测量和结果。使用 PEDro 量表和循证医学中心证据水平量表对研究进行分析。
PEDro 量表上的研究评分范围为 10 分中的 6 分至 8 分。根据证据水平量表,病例研究(n=6)的质量较低,等级为 4。其余 4 项研究中有 3 项评为 2b,最后一项研究评为 1b。
研究质量参差不齐,从高质量的实验研究到低质量的病例研究都有。总体而言,肌筋膜松解治疗的研究结果是积极的,但由于质量较低,几乎无法得出结论。本综述中的研究可以为未来的随机对照试验提供良好的基础。