Suppr超能文献

社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究中的束支传导阻滞与死亡风险

Bundle branch blocks and the risk of mortality in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study.

作者信息

Zhang Zhu-Ming, Rautaharju Pentti M, Prineas Ronald J, Loehr Laura, Rosamond Wayne, Soliman Elsayed Z

机构信息

aEpidemiological Cardiology Research Center (EPICARE), Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem bDepartment of Epidemiology, Galling's School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill cDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2016 Jun;17(6):411-7. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000235.

Abstract

AIMS

The main objective of our study was to evaluate the associations between different categories of bundle branch blocks (BBBs) and mortality and to consider possible impact of QRS prolongation in these associations.

METHODS

This analysis included 15 408 participants (mean age 54 years, 55.2% women, and 26.9% blacks) from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. We used Cox regression to examine associations between left BBB (LBBB), right BBB (RBBB) and indetermined type of ventricular conduction defect [intraventricular conduction defect (IVCD)] with coronary heart disease (CHD) death and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

During a mean 21 years of follow-up, 4767 deaths occurred; of these, 728 were CHD deaths. Compared to No-BBB, LBBB and IVCD were strongly associated with increased CHD death (hazard ratios 4.11 and 3.18, respectively; P < 0.001 for both). Furthermore, compared to No-BBB with QRS duration less than 100 ms, CHD mortality risk was increased 1.33-fold for the No-BBB group with QRS duration 100-109 ms, and 1.48-fold with QRS duration 110-119 ms, 3.52-fold for pooled LBBB-IVCD group with QRS duration less than 140 ms and 4.96-fold for pooled LBBB-IVCD group with QRS duration at least 140 ms (P < 0.001). However, mortality risk was not significantly increased for lone RBBB. For all-cause mortality, trends similar to those for CHD death were observed within the BBB groups, although at lower levels of risk.

CONCLUSION

Prevalent LBBB and IVCD, but not RBBB, are associated with increased risk of CHD death and all-cause mortality. Mortality risk is further increased as the QRS duration is prolonged above 140 ms.

摘要

目的

我们研究的主要目的是评估不同类型的束支传导阻滞(BBB)与死亡率之间的关联,并探讨QRS波增宽在这些关联中可能产生的影响。

方法

本分析纳入了社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究中的15408名参与者(平均年龄54岁,女性占55.2%,黑人占26.9%)。我们使用Cox回归分析来研究左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)、右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)以及未明确类型的心室传导缺陷[室内传导阻滞(IVCD)]与冠心病(CHD)死亡和全因死亡率之间的关联。

结果

在平均21年的随访期间,共发生4767例死亡;其中728例为冠心病死亡。与无BBB相比,LBBB和IVCD与冠心病死亡风险增加显著相关(风险比分别为4.11和3.18;两者P均<0.001)。此外,与QRS时限小于100ms的无BBB组相比,QRS时限为100 - 109ms的无BBB组冠心病死亡风险增加1.33倍,QRS时限为110 - 119ms的无BBB组增加1.48倍,QRS时限小于140ms的LBBB-IVCD合并组增加3.52倍,QRS时限至少140ms的LBBB-IVCD合并组增加4.96倍(P<0.001)。然而,单纯RBBB的死亡风险并未显著增加。对于全因死亡率,在BBB各亚组中观察到与冠心病死亡相似的趋势,尽管风险水平较低。

结论

普遍存在的LBBB和IVCD,但不包括RBBB,与冠心病死亡风险和全因死亡率增加相关。当QRS时限延长至140ms以上时,死亡风险进一步增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验