• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The relationship of area-level sociodemographic characteristics, household composition and individual-level socioeconomic status on walking behavior among adults.地区层面的社会人口特征、家庭构成与个体层面的社会经济地位对成年人步行行为的影响
Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2013 Apr;50:149-157. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.006.
2
Explaining socio-economic status differences in walking for transport: an ecological analysis of individual, social and environmental factors.解释出行步行方面的社会经济地位差异:个体、社会和环境因素的生态分析
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Mar;68(6):1013-20. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.008. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
3
Why Some Walk and Others Don't: Neighborhood Safety and the Sociodemographic Variation Effect on Walking for Leisure and Transportation.为何有些人会步行,而有些人则不会:邻里安全与社会人口统计学变异对休闲和交通步行的影响。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2020 Jul/Aug;26(4):E24-E32. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000992.
4
Differences in transportation and leisure physical activity by neighborhood design controlling for residential choice.通过控制居住选择的邻里设计来研究交通和休闲身体活动的差异。
J Sport Health Sci. 2019 Nov;8(6):532-539. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 9.
5
A positive neighborhood walkability is associated with a higher magnitude of leisure walking in adults upon COVID-19 restrictions: a longitudinal cohort study.积极的邻里步行友好性与 COVID-19 限制期间成年人休闲步行的幅度更大相关:一项纵向队列研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Sep 26;20(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01512-3.
6
Neighborhood Built Environment and Socioeconomic Status are Associated with Active Commuting and Sedentary Behavior, but not with Leisure-Time Physical Activity, in University Students.社区建成环境和社会经济地位与大学生的主动通勤和久坐行为相关,但与休闲时间体力活动无关。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 31;16(17):3176. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173176.
7
Neighborhood walkability and TV viewing time among Australian adults.澳大利亚成年人的邻里环境适宜步行程度与看电视时间
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Dec;33(6):444-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.035.
8
Leisure Time and Transportation Walking Among Adults With and Without Arthritis in the United States, 2010.美国关节炎患者与非关节炎患者的休闲时间和交通方式——行走,2010 年。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Feb;71(2):178-188. doi: 10.1002/acr.23790.
9
Active living neighborhoods: is neighborhood walkability a key element for Belgian adolescents?积极生活的社区:社区可步行性是否是比利时青少年的关键因素?
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 4;12:7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-7.
10
Walking to Work: The Roles of Neighborhood Walkability and Socioeconomic Deprivation.步行上班:邻里适步性与社会经济剥夺的作用
J Phys Act Health. 2015 Jun 16;12 Suppl 1:S70-5. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2012-0359.

引用本文的文献

1
Individual Characteristics in the Comprehension of Pandemic Video Communication: Randomized Controlled Between-Subjects Design.大流行视频通信理解中的个体特征:随机对照受试者间设计。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 4;26:e48882. doi: 10.2196/48882.
2
A Path Toward Systemic Equity in Life Cycle Assessment and Decision-Making: Standardizing Sociodemographic Data Practices.生命周期评估与决策中实现系统公平的途径:规范社会人口数据实践
Environ Eng Sci. 2022 Sep 1;39(9):759-769. doi: 10.1089/ees.2021.0375. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
3
Contextualizing Walkability: Do Relationships Between Built Environments and Walking Vary by Socioeconomic Context?情境化的可步行性:建成环境与步行之间的关系是否因社会经济背景而异?
J Am Plann Assoc. 2017;83(3):296-314. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2017.1322527. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
4
Are Differences in Physical Activity across Socioeconomic Groups Associated with Choice of Physical Activity Variables to Report?不同社会经济群体的体力活动差异是否与报告体力活动变量的选择有关?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 5;15(5):922. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050922.
5
Neighborhood Social Cohesion as a Mediator of Neighborhood Conditions on Mothers' Engagement in Physical Activity: Results From the Geographic Research on Wellbeing Study.邻里社会凝聚力作为邻里条件对母亲参与身体活动的中介作用:来自幸福感地理研究的结果。
Health Educ Behav. 2017 Dec;44(6):845-856. doi: 10.1177/1090198116687537. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
6
Travel behavior of low income older adults and implementation of an accessibility calculator.低收入老年人的出行行为与可达性计算器的应用
J Transp Health. 2015 Jun;2(2):257-2698. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2015.02.006.
7
TransMilenio, a Scalable Bus Rapid Transit System for Promoting Physical Activity.“千禧公交”,一种促进身体活动的可扩展快速公交系统。
J Urban Health. 2016 Apr;93(2):256-70. doi: 10.1007/s11524-015-0019-4.
8
Walking and cycling for commuting, leisure and errands: relations with individual characteristics and leisure-time physical activity in a cross-sectional survey (the ACTI-Cités project).通勤、休闲及日常出行中的步行与骑行:横断面调查中与个体特征及休闲时间体力活动的关系(ACTI-Cités项目)
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Dec 9;12:150. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0310-5.
9
A Scoping Review of Observational Studies Examining Relationships between Environmental Behaviors and Health Behaviors.一项关于观察性研究的范围综述,该研究考察环境行为与健康行为之间的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 May 5;12(5):4833-58. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120504833.
10
Active transportation in adult survivors of childhood cancer and neighborhood controls.儿童癌症成年幸存者与社区对照者的主动运输情况。
J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Feb;10(1):11-20. doi: 10.1007/s11764-015-0447-x. Epub 2015 Mar 26.

本文引用的文献

1
[Chinese guidelines for data processing and analysis concerning the International Physical Activity Questionnaire].[国际体力活动问卷数据处理与分析中国指南]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Aug;35(8):961-4.
2
Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999-2010.美国成年人肥胖率及体重指数分布的趋势:1999-2010 年。
JAMA. 2012 Feb 1;307(5):491-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.39. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
3
Examining the etiology of childhood obesity: The IDEA study.探讨儿童肥胖症的病因:IDEAS 研究。
Am J Community Psychol. 2009 Dec;44(3-4):338-49. doi: 10.1007/s10464-009-9269-1.
4
Explaining socio-economic status differences in walking for transport: an ecological analysis of individual, social and environmental factors.解释出行步行方面的社会经济地位差异:个体、社会和环境因素的生态分析
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Mar;68(6):1013-20. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.008. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
5
Prevalence of self-reported physically active adults--United States, 2007.2007年美国自我报告的身体活动成年人患病率
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008 Dec 5;57(48):1297-300.
6
Validation of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short among Blacks.《国际体力活动问卷简表》在黑人中的效度验证
J Phys Act Health. 2008 Sep;5(5):746-60. doi: 10.1123/jpah.5.5.746.
7
Built environment correlates of walking: a review.步行与建成环境的相关性:综述
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jul;40(7 Suppl):S550-66. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c67a4.
8
Prevalence of transportation and leisure walking among U.S. adults.美国成年人中交通出行步行和休闲步行的患病率。
Prev Med. 2008 Sep;47(3):329-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.02.018. Epub 2008 Mar 10.
9
Neighborhood design and walking. A quasi-experimental longitudinal study.邻里设计与步行。一项准实验性纵向研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Apr;34(4):313-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.019.
10
How socio-economic status contributes to participation in leisure-time physical activity.社会经济地位如何影响休闲体育活动的参与度。
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jun;66(12):2596-609. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.02.012. Epub 2008 Mar 21.

地区层面的社会人口特征、家庭构成与个体层面的社会经济地位对成年人步行行为的影响

The relationship of area-level sociodemographic characteristics, household composition and individual-level socioeconomic status on walking behavior among adults.

作者信息

Hearst Mary O, Sirard John R, Forsyth Ann, Parker Emily D, Klein Elizabeth G, Green Christine G, Lytle Leslie A

机构信息

St. Catherine University, 2004 Randolph Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55105

出版信息

Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2013 Apr;50:149-157. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.006.

DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.006
PMID:23729994
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3667602/
Abstract

Understanding the contextual factors associated with why adults walk is important for those interested in increasing walking as a mode of transportation and leisure. This paper investigates the relationships between neighborhood-level sociodemographic context, individual level sociodemographic characteristics and walking for leisure and transport. Data from two community-based studies of adults (n=550) were used to determine the association between the area-sociodemographic environment (ASDE), calculated from U.S. Census variables, and individual-level SES as potential correlates of walking behavior. Descriptive statistics, mean comparisons and Pearson's correlations coefficients were used to assess bivariate relationships. Generalized estimating equations were used to model the relationship between ASDE, as quartiles, and walking behavior. Adjusted models suggest adults engage in more minutes of walking for transportation and less walking for leisure in the most disadvantaged compared to the least disadvantaged neighborhoods but adding individual level demographics and SES eliminated the significant results. However, when models were stratified for free or reduced cost lunch, of those with children who qualified for free or reduced lunch, those who lived in the wealthiest neighborhoods engaged in 10.7 minutes less of total walking per day compared to those living in the most challenged neighborhoods (p<0.001). Strategies to increase walking for transportation or leisure need to take account of individual level socioeconomic factors in addition to area-level measures.

摘要

对于那些有志于将步行作为一种交通方式和休闲方式加以推广的人来说,了解与成年人步行原因相关的背景因素非常重要。本文研究了邻里层面的社会人口背景、个体层面的社会人口特征与休闲步行和交通步行之间的关系。来自两项针对成年人的社区研究(n = 550)的数据被用于确定根据美国人口普查变量计算得出的区域社会人口环境(ASDE)与个体层面的社会经济地位(SES)之间的关联,它们是步行行为的潜在相关因素。描述性统计、均值比较和皮尔逊相关系数被用于评估双变量关系。广义估计方程被用于对作为四分位数的ASDE与步行行为之间的关系进行建模。调整后的模型表明,与最不贫困的社区相比,在最贫困的社区中,成年人用于交通的步行时间更多,而用于休闲的步行时间更少,但纳入个体层面的人口统计学因素和社会经济地位后,显著结果消失了。然而,当模型按免费或减价午餐进行分层时,在有符合免费或减价午餐条件孩子的人群中,与生活在最具挑战性社区的人相比,生活在最富裕社区的人每天的总步行时间少10.7分钟(p<0.001)。除了区域层面的措施外,增加交通步行或休闲步行的策略还需要考虑个体层面的社会经济因素。