• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国人高分辨率阻抗测压法的正常值数据。

Normative data of high-resolution impedance manometry in the Chinese population.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China; Department of Gastroenterology, Shanxi Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, China.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Oct;28(10):1611-5. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12285.

DOI:10.1111/jgh.12285
PMID:23730912
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Current normative data of high-resolution manometry have been obtained from Western populations, and esophageal motility disorders have been categorized using Chicago classification. However, the utility of high-resolution impedance manometry (HRiM) in the Chinese population has not been evaluated. The study aimed to investigate the normal reference of esophageal motility in healthy volunteers (as defined by Chicago classification) using HRiM.

METHODS

Healthy, fasted volunteers underwent HRiM in a supine position with 10 liquid swallows and 10 viscous swallows. Integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), distal contractile integral (DCI), contractile front velocity (CFV), and distal latency were calculated. The interquartile ranges and the 95th percentile range for each metric were obtained.

RESULTS

Forty-two healthy volunteers were enrolled with 411 total liquid swallows and 398 viscous swallows available for analysis. A 20.5 mmHg of IRP and a 3195 mmHg·s·cm of DCI as the 95th percentile for liquid swallows were established. Using the reference range defined by Chicago classification, 6.3% (26/411) weak peristalsis and 0.7% (3/411) failed peristalsis for liquid swallows were observed; 12 (28.6%, 12/42) and 2 (4.7%, 2/42) individuals were diagnosed as esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and weak peristalsis for liquid swallows. Compared with liquid swallows, viscous swallows had a decreased IRP (P = 0.000) and CFV (P = 0.000), and an unchanged DCI (P = 0.211).

CONCLUSIONS

HRiM normative data of both liquid and viscous swallows from healthy Chinese volunteers were established. The IRP and CFV were significantly decreased in the viscous swallows compared with those of the liquid swallows.

摘要

背景与目的

高分辨率测压法的现有参考标准数据来自西方人群,食管运动障碍采用芝加哥分类进行分类。然而,高分辨率阻抗测压法(HRiM)在中国人群中的应用尚未得到评估。本研究旨在通过 HRiM 评估健康志愿者(根据芝加哥分类定义)的食管运动正常参考值。

方法

健康、空腹志愿者采用仰卧位,进行 10 次液体吞咽和 10 次粘性吞咽的 HRiM。计算整合松弛压(IRP)、远端收缩积分(DCI)、收缩前缘速度(CFV)和远端潜伏期。获得每个指标的四分位间距和 95%百分位范围。

结果

共纳入 42 名健康志愿者,液体吞咽分析共有 411 次,粘性吞咽分析共有 398 次。液体吞咽的 IRP 为 20.5mmHg,DCI 为 3195mmHg·s·cm,为 95%百分位范围。根据芝加哥分类定义的参考范围,液体吞咽观察到 6.3%(26/411)为弱蠕动和 0.7%(3/411)为蠕动失败;12 名(28.6%,12/42)和 2 名(4.7%,2/42)个体被诊断为液体吞咽时食管胃连接部流出梗阻和弱蠕动。与液体吞咽相比,粘性吞咽的 IRP(P=0.000)和 CFV(P=0.000)降低,而 DCI 不变(P=0.211)。

结论

建立了来自中国健康志愿者的液体和粘性吞咽 HRiM 正常参考值。与液体吞咽相比,粘性吞咽的 IRP 和 CFV 明显降低。

相似文献

1
Normative data of high-resolution impedance manometry in the Chinese population.中国人高分辨率阻抗测压法的正常值数据。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Oct;28(10):1611-5. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12285.
2
Normative values and factors affecting water-perfused esophageal high-resolution impedance manometry for a Chinese population.中国人水灌注高分辨率食管阻抗测压法的参考值及其影响因素。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018 Jun;30(6):e13265. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13265. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
3
Normal esophageal high-resolution manometry and impedance values in the supine and sitting positions in the population of Northern China.中国北方人群仰卧位和坐位时食管高分辨率测压及阻抗的正常值。
Dis Esophagus. 2016 Apr;29(3):267-72. doi: 10.1111/dote.12320. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
4
The effects of different postures and provocative swallow materials on the normative Chicago 3.0 metrics in a healthy Asian population.不同姿势和激发吞咽材料对健康亚洲人群中芝加哥3.0标准指标的影响。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 May;36(5):1244-1252. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15284. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
5
An analysis of distal esophageal impedance in individuals with and without esophageal motility abnormalities.对有和没有食管动力异常的个体的食管远端阻抗进行分析。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008 Aug;42(7):776-81. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31806daf77.
6
The effect of a sitting vs supine posture on normative esophageal pressure topography metrics and Chicago Classification diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders.**标题**:坐姿与仰卧位对食管正常压力地形图指标及芝加哥分类食管动力障碍诊断的影响。 **摘要**:背景:食管压力监测是评估食管动力障碍的金标准,但尚未标准化患者的体位。我们旨在比较仰卧位和坐姿下食管压力监测的结果,以确定最适合食管压力监测的体位。方法:前瞻性纳入了 102 例疑似食管动力障碍的患者,所有患者均进行了标准高分辨率食管测压(HRM),并在仰卧位和坐姿下进行了重复测试。结果:与仰卧位相比,坐姿下的食管下括约肌(LES)静息压显著降低(分别为 11.4 ± 4.6mmHg 和 17.1 ± 5.4mmHg,P < 0.001),LES 长度显著缩短(分别为 2.8 ± 0.9cm 和 3.4 ± 1.0cm,P < 0.001)。然而,两种体位下的 LES 完整性、残余压、松弛率、食管体收缩幅度、收缩积分、蠕动波完整性和食管测压参数均无显著差异。此外,两种体位下的芝加哥分类诊断也没有显著差异。结论:与仰卧位相比,坐姿下的 LES 静息压和 LES 长度降低,但食管体收缩和蠕动波完整性以及 Chicago 分类诊断不受影响。因此,坐姿可以作为一种替代仰卧位的方法进行食管压力监测。 **关键词**:食管动力障碍;压力监测;体位;仰卧位;坐姿 **摘要**:背景:食管压力监测是评估食管动力障碍的金标准,但尚未标准化患者的体位。我们旨在比较仰卧位和坐姿下食管压力监测的结果,以确定最适合食管压力监测的体位。方法:前瞻性纳入了 102 例疑似食管动力障碍的患者,所有患者均进行了标准高分辨率食管测压(HRM),并在仰卧位和坐姿下进行了重复测试。结果:与仰卧位相比,坐姿下的食管下括约肌(LES)静息压显著降低(分别为 11.4 ± 4.6mmHg 和 17.1 ± 5.4mmHg,P < 0.001),LES 长度显著缩短(分别为 2.8 ± 0.9cm 和 3.4 ± 1.0cm,P < 0.001)。然而,两种体位下的 LES 完整性、残余压、松弛率、食管体收缩幅度、收缩积分、蠕动波完整性和食管测压参数均无显著差异。此外,两种体位下的芝加哥分类诊断也没有显著差异。结论:与仰卧位相比,坐姿下的 LES 静息压和 LES 长度降低,但食管体收缩和蠕动波完整性以及 Chicago 分类诊断不受影响。因此,坐姿可以作为一种替代仰卧位的方法进行食管压力监测。 **关键词**:食管动力障碍;压力监测;体位;仰卧位;坐姿
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 Oct;24(10):e509-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.02001.x. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
7
In ineffective esophageal motility, failed swallows are more functionally relevant than weak swallows.无效食管动力时,无效吞咽比吞咽无力更具有功能相关性。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018 Jun;30(6):e13297. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13297. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
8
Normal esophageal pressure topography metrics for data derived from the Sandhill-Unisensor high-resolution manometry assembly in supine and sitting positions.仰卧位和坐位时,Sandhill-Unisensor高分辨率测压组件所获数据的正常食管压力地形图指标。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):285-92. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12501. Epub 2015 Jan 3.
9
The differences in the esophageal motility between liquid and solid bolus swallows: A multicenter high-resolution manometry study in Chinese asymptomatic volunteers.液体和固体团块吞咽时食管动力的差异:中国无症状志愿者的多中心高分辨率测压研究。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019 Jun;31(6):e13574. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13574. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
10
Esophageal function testing with combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry: multicenter study in healthy volunteers.联合多通道腔内阻抗与测压的食管功能检测:健康志愿者的多中心研究
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 May;1(3):174-82. doi: 10.1053/cgh.2003.50026.

引用本文的文献

1
Normal Values in Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry Performed Using 36-Channel Water-Perfused Catheter or Solid-State Catheter.使用36通道水灌注导管或固态导管进行食管高分辨率测压的正常值。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2025 Mar 25;36(8):515-522. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2025.24582.
2
Integrated Relaxation Pressure and Its Diagnostic Ability May Vary According to the Conditions Used for HREM Recording.综合弛豫压力及其诊断能力可能因 HREM 记录使用的条件而异。
Dysphagia. 2024 Aug;39(4):746-756. doi: 10.1007/s00455-023-10655-1. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
3
Ethnic Differences in Clinical Presentations and Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry Findings in Patients with Achalasia.
贲门失弛缓症患者临床表现及食管高分辨率测压结果的种族差异
Dysphagia. 2023 Aug;38(4):1247-1253. doi: 10.1007/s00455-022-10549-8. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
4
Peroral endoscopic longer shorter esophageal myotomy for achalasia treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经口内镜下长/短食管肌层切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Mar 27;14(3):247-259. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i3.247.
5
The effects of different postures and provocative swallow materials on the normative Chicago 3.0 metrics in a healthy Asian population.不同姿势和激发吞咽材料对健康亚洲人群中芝加哥3.0标准指标的影响。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 May;36(5):1244-1252. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15284. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
6
Esophageal Baseline Impedance From High-resolution Impedance Manometry Correlates With Mean Nocturnal Baseline Impedance From pH-impedance Monitoring.高分辨率阻抗测压法测得的食管基线阻抗与pH-阻抗监测测得的夜间平均基线阻抗相关。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020 Sep 30;26(4):455-462. doi: 10.5056/jnm19142.
7
Clinical impact of different cut-off values in high-resolution manometry systems on diagnosing esophageal motility disorders.不同高分辨率测压系统截断值对食管动力障碍诊断的临床影响。
J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec;54(12):1078-1082. doi: 10.1007/s00535-019-01608-3. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
8
British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for oesophageal manometry and oesophageal reflux monitoring.英国胃肠病学会食管测压和食管反流监测指南。
Gut. 2019 Oct;68(10):1731-1750. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-318115. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
9
Combined Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance and High-resolution Manometry Improves Detection of Clinically Relevant Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction.联合多通道腔内阻抗与高分辨率测压可提高临床相关食管胃交界部流出道梗阻的检测率。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019 Jan 31;25(1):75-81. doi: 10.5056/jnm18148.
10
Phenotypes of Jackhammer esophagus in patients with typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease responsive to proton pump inhibitors.质子泵抑制剂治疗有效、具有典型胃食管反流病症状患者的贲门失弛缓症表型。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 2;8(1):9949. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27756-9.