• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共情在从他人角度选择奖励中的作用。

The role of empathy in choosing rewards from another's perspective.

机构信息

School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, Centre for Integrative Neuroscience and Neurodynamics, University of Reading Reading, UK.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 May 23;7:174. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00174. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00174
PMID:23734112
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3661995/
Abstract

As social animals, we regularly act in the interest of others by making decisions on their behalf. These decisions can take the form of choices between smaller short-term rewards and larger long-term rewards, and can be effectively indexed by temporal discounting (TD). In a TD paradigm, a reward loses subjective value with increasing delay presumably because it becomes more difficult to simulate how much the recipient (e.g., future self) will value it. If this is the case, then the value of delayed rewards should be discounted even more steeply when we are choosing for someone whose feelings we do not readily simulate, such as socially distant strangers. Second, the ability to simulate shows individual differences and is indexed by trait empathy. We hypothesized that individuals high in trait empathy will more readily simulate, and hence discount less steeply for distant others, compared to those who are low on trait empathy. To test these predictions, we asked 63 participants from the general population to perform a TD task from the perspectives of close and distant others, as well as their own. People were found to discount less steeply for themselves, and the steepness of TD increased with increasing distance from self. Additionally, individuals who scored high in trait empathy were found to discount less steeply for distant others compared to those who scored low. These findings confirm the role of empathy in determining how we choose rewards for others.

摘要

作为社会动物,我们经常代表他人做出决策,以符合他们的利益。这些决策可以表现为在较小的短期奖励和较大的长期奖励之间进行选择,并且可以通过时间折扣(TD)有效地进行索引。在 TD 范式中,奖励的主观价值随着延迟的增加而降低,这可能是因为我们越来越难以模拟接受者(例如,未来的自我)将对其的重视程度。如果是这样,那么当我们为那些我们不容易模拟其感受的人(例如,社交距离较远的陌生人)做出选择时,延迟奖励的价值应该会更加陡峭地贴现。其次,模拟能力存在个体差异,并由特质同理心来衡量。我们假设,与低特质同理心的人相比,高特质同理心的个体更容易模拟,因此对远方他人的贴现率较低。为了检验这些预测,我们要求来自普通人群的 63 名参与者从亲密他人和远方他人的角度,以及从自己的角度来执行 TD 任务。结果发现,人们对自己的贴现率较低,TD 的陡峭程度随着与自我的距离增加而增加。此外,高特质同理心的个体对远方他人的贴现率低于低特质同理心的个体。这些发现证实了同理心在决定我们如何为他人选择奖励方面的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c61c/3661995/c1c9a1b76d38/fnhum-07-00174-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c61c/3661995/b2192e14b70d/fnhum-07-00174-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c61c/3661995/7fd3ebe2d40d/fnhum-07-00174-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c61c/3661995/c1c9a1b76d38/fnhum-07-00174-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c61c/3661995/b2192e14b70d/fnhum-07-00174-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c61c/3661995/7fd3ebe2d40d/fnhum-07-00174-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c61c/3661995/c1c9a1b76d38/fnhum-07-00174-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
The role of empathy in choosing rewards from another's perspective.共情在从他人角度选择奖励中的作用。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 May 23;7:174. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00174. eCollection 2013.
2
Social and delay discounting in autism spectrum disorder.自闭症谱系障碍中的社会和延迟折扣。
Autism Res. 2019 Jun;12(6):870-877. doi: 10.1002/aur.2085. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
3
Encoding of Vicarious Reward Prediction in Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Relationship with Trait Empathy.前扣带回皮质中替代性奖励预测的编码及其与特质共情的关系。
J Neurosci. 2015 Oct 7;35(40):13720-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1703-15.2015.
4
Spatial discounting of food and social rewards in guppies (poecilia reticulata).孔雀鱼(孔雀鱼)对食物和社交奖励的空间折扣。
Front Psychol. 2011 Apr 20;2:68. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00068. eCollection 2011.
5
Neural mechanisms of individual differences in temporal discounting of monetary and primary rewards in adolescents.青少年对货币和初级奖励的时间折扣的个体差异的神经机制。
Neuroimage. 2017 Jun;153:198-210. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.013. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
6
Delay Discounting of Monetary and Social Media Rewards: Magnitude and Trait Effects.货币与社交媒体奖励的延迟折扣:量级与特质效应
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 11;13:822505. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.822505. eCollection 2022.
7
The role of simulation in intertemporal choices.模拟在跨期选择中的作用。
Front Neurosci. 2015 Mar 31;9:94. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00094. eCollection 2015.
8
Discounting of delayed rewards: (A)theoretical interpretation of the Kirby questionnaire.延迟奖励的折扣:(A)基尔比问卷的理论解释。
Behav Processes. 2014 Sep;107:99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.07.021. Epub 2014 Aug 17.
9
Temporal and probabilistic discounting of rewards in children and adolescents: effects of age and ADHD symptoms.儿童和青少年对奖励的时间和概率折扣:年龄及注意缺陷多动障碍症状的影响
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(11):2092-103. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.012. Epub 2005 Nov 21.
10
Associations Between Intertemporal Food Choice and BMI in Adult Women: An fMRI Study Using a Quasi-realistic Design.成年女性跨期食物选择与体重指数的关联:一项采用准现实设计的功能磁共振成像研究
Cogn Behav Neurol. 2024 Dec 1;37(4):205-219. doi: 10.1097/WNN.0000000000000377.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Empathic Concern on Prosocial Behavior in Gain and Loss Contexts: Evidence from Event-Related Potential.共情关注对得失情境下亲社会行为的影响:来自事件相关电位的证据
Brain Sci. 2024 Apr 19;14(4):400. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14040400.
2
Influence of agent's self-disclosure on human empathy.主体对自我暴露的反应对人类同理心的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 May 10;18(5):e0283955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283955. eCollection 2023.
3
Oxytocin-Receptor Gene Modulates Reward-Network Connection and Relationship with Empathy Performance.

本文引用的文献

1
Simulation theory.模拟理论。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2010 Jul;1(4):527-538. doi: 10.1002/wcs.33. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
2
Decisions for others become less impulsive the further away they are on the family tree.离家族树越远,为他人做决定就越不冲动。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049479. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
3
An agent independent axis for executed and modeled choice in medial prefrontal cortex.内侧前额叶皮质中执行和模拟选择的代理独立轴。
催产素受体基因调节奖赏网络连接及与共情表现的关系。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Jan 7;16:85-94. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S370834. eCollection 2023.
4
Better together? Social distance affects joint probability discounting.更紧密的关系?社交距离会影响共同概率折扣。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Oct;50(7):1513-1529. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01290-6. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
5
Self vs. other, child vs. adult. An experimental comparison of valuation perspectives for valuation of EQ-5D-Y-3L health states.自我与他人,儿童与成人。EQ-5D-Y-3L 健康状态评估中评估视角的实验性比较。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Dec;22(9):1507-1518. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01377-y. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
6
Time Perspectives and Delay of Gratification - The Role of Psychological Distance Toward the Future and Perceived Possibility of Getting a Future Reward.时间视角与延迟满足——对未来的心理距离和获得未来奖励的感知可能性的作用。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020 Aug 10;13:653-663. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S246443. eCollection 2020.
7
Perceived Closeness and Autistic Traits Modulate Interpersonal Vocal Communication.感知到的亲近感和自闭症特质调节人际间的语音交流。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 28;11:50. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00050. eCollection 2020.
8
Experimental reductions of delay discounting and impulsive choice: A systematic review and meta-analysis.实验性降低延迟折扣和冲动选择:系统综述和荟萃分析。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Sep;147(9):1349-1381. doi: 10.1037/xge0000462.
9
Let's decide together: Differences between individual and joint delay discounting.让我们共同决定:个体与联合延迟折扣之间的差异。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 20;12(4):e0176003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176003. eCollection 2017.
10
Standing in Your Peer's Shoes Hurts Your Feats: The Self-Others Discrepancy in Risk Attitude and Impulsivity.设身处地为同伴着想会损害你的成就:风险态度和冲动性方面的自我与他人差异。
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 19;7:197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00197. eCollection 2016.
Neuron. 2012 Sep 20;75(6):1114-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.07.023.
4
Learning to simulate others' decisions.学习模拟他人的决策。
Neuron. 2012 Jun 21;74(6):1125-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.030.
5
Empathic choice involves vmPFC value signals that are modulated by social processing implemented in IPL.共情选择涉及 vmPFC 的价值信号,这些信号由 IPL 中实现的社会处理所调制。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Feb;8(2):201-8. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr086. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
6
The impact of alcohol dependence on social brain function.酒精依赖对社会脑功能的影响。
Addict Biol. 2013 Jan;18(1):109-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2012.00437.x. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
7
Differences in risk-defusing behavior in deciding for oneself versus deciding for other people.为自己做决定与为他人做决定时风险化解行为的差异。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Jan;139(1):239-43. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.09.013. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
8
A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety.儿童时期自我控制能力的梯度变化可以预测健康、财富和公共安全。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 15;108(7):2693-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010076108. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
9
Reward circuitry function in autism spectrum disorders.孤独症谱系障碍的奖励回路功能。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Feb;7(2):160-72. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq095. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
10
Maturation of limbic corticostriatal activation and connectivity associated with developmental changes in temporal discounting.与时间贴现的发展变化相关的边缘皮质纹状体激活和连接的成熟。
Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 15;54(2):1344-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.067. Epub 2010 Sep 15.