Department of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
PLoS One. 2013 May 29;8(5):e65296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065296. Print 2013.
It has been suggested that dogs display a secure base effect similar to that found in human children (i.e., using the owner as a secure base for interacting with the environment). In children, this effect influences their daily lives and importantly also their performance in cognitive testing. Here, we investigate the importance of the secure base effect for dogs in a problem-solving task.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Using a manipulative task, we tested dogs in three conditions, in which we varied the owner's presence and behavior (Experiment 1: "Absent owner", "Silent owner", "Encouraging owner") and in one additional condition, in which the owner was replaced by an unfamiliar human (Experiment 2: "Replaced owner"). We found that the dogs' duration of manipulating the apparatus was longer when their owner was present than absent, irrespective of the owner's behavior. The presence of an unfamiliar human however did not increase their manipulation. Furthermore, the reduced manipulation during the absence of the owner was not correlated with the dog's degree of separation distress scored in a preceding attachment experiment.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our study is the first to provide evidence for an owner-specific secure base effect in dogs that extends from attachment tests to other areas of dogs' lives and also manifests itself in cognitive testing - thereby confirming the remarkable similarity between the secure base effect in dogs and in human children. These results also have important implications for behavioral testing in dogs, because the presence or absence of the owner during a test situation might substantially influence dogs' motivation and therefore the outcome of the test.
有人认为,狗表现出类似于人类儿童的安全基地效应(即,将主人作为与环境互动的安全基地)。在儿童中,这种效应影响他们的日常生活,重要的是也影响他们在认知测试中的表现。在这里,我们研究了安全基地效应对狗在解决问题任务中的重要性。
方法/主要发现:我们使用一种操纵任务,在三种条件下测试狗,在这些条件下,我们改变了主人的存在和行为(实验 1:“不在的主人”、“沉默的主人”、“鼓励的主人”),并在一个额外的条件下,用一个陌生的人代替主人(实验 2:“替换的主人”)。我们发现,无论主人的行为如何,当主人在场时,狗操纵仪器的时间比不在场时要长。然而,一个陌生的人的存在并没有增加它们的操作。此外,在主人不在场时减少的操作与在之前的依恋实验中狗的分离焦虑得分没有相关性。
结论/意义:我们的研究首次为狗的特定于主人的安全基地效应提供了证据,这种效应从依恋测试扩展到狗生活的其他领域,也在认知测试中表现出来——从而证实了狗和人类儿童的安全基地效应之间的显著相似性。这些结果对狗的行为测试也有重要的意义,因为在测试情境中主人的存在与否可能会极大地影响狗的动机,从而影响测试的结果。