Suppr超能文献

围绝经期和绝经后女性性功能的激素治疗

Hormone therapy for sexual function in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.

作者信息

Nastri Carolina O, Lara Lucia A, Ferriani Rui A, Rosa-E-Silva Ana Carolina J S, Figueiredo Jaqueline B P, Martins Wellington P

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 5(6):CD009672. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009672.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The perimenopausal and postmenopausal periods are associated with many symptoms, including sexual complaints.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of hormone therapy (HT) on sexual function in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched for articles in the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group (MDSG) Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov, Current Controlled Trials, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ISI Web of Knowledge and OpenGrey. The last search was performed in December 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials comparing HT to either placebo or no intervention (control). We considered as HT estrogens alone; estrogens in combination with progestogens; synthetic steroids (for example tibolone); or selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) (for example raloxifene, bazedoxifene). Studies of other drugs possibly used in the relief of menopausal symptoms were excluded. We included studies that evaluated sexual function using any validated assessment tool. The primary outcome was a composite score for sexual function and the scores for individual domains (arousal and sexual interest, orgasm, and pain) were secondary outcomes. Studies were selected by two authors independently.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were independently extracted by two authors and checked by a third. Risk of bias assessment was performed independently by two authors. We contacted study investigators as required. Data were analysed using standardized mean difference (SMD) and relative risk (RR). We stratified the analysis by participant characteristics with regard to menopausal symptoms. The overall quality of the evidence for the primary outcome was evaluated using the GRADE criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

The search retrieved 2351 records from which 27 studies (16,393 women) were included. The 'symptomatic or early post-menopausal' subgroup included nine studies: perimenopausal women (one study), up to 36 months postmenopause (one study), up to five years postmenopause (one study), experiencing vasomotor or other menopausal symptoms (five studies), or experiencing hot flushes and sexual dysfunction (one study). The 'unselected postmenopausal women' subgroup included 18 studies, which included women regardless of menopausal symptoms and permitted the inclusion of women with more than five years since the final menstrual period. No studies were restricted to women with sexual dysfunction. Only five studies evaluated sexual function as a primary outcome. Eighteen studies were deemed at high risk of bias, and the other nine studies were at unclear risk of bias. Twenty studies received commercial funding.Findings for sexual function (measured by composite score):For estrogens alone versus control, in symptomatic or early postmenopausal women the SMD and 95% CI were compatible with a small to moderate benefit in sexual function for the HT group (SMD 0.38, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.54, P < 0.00001, 3 studies, 699 women, I² = 55%, high-quality evidence). In unselected postmenopausal women, the 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a small benefit (SMD 0.16, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.34, P = 0.08, 2 studies, 478 women, I² = 44%, low-quality evidence). The subgroups were not pooled because of considerable heterogeneity.For estrogens combined with progestogens versus control, in symptomatic or early postmenopausal women the 95% CI was compatible with a small to moderate benefit for sexual function in the HT group (SMD 0.42, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.64, P = 0.0003, 1 study, 335 women, moderate-quality evidence). In unselected postmenopausal women, the 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a small benefit (SMD 0.09, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.20, P = 0.10, 3 studies, 1314 women, I² = 0%, moderate-quality evidence). The subgroups were not pooled because of considerable heterogeneity.For tibolone versus control, in symptomatic or early postmenopausal women the 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a small benefit for sexual function in the HT group (SMD 0.13, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.26, P = 0.05, 1 study, 883 women, low-quality evidence). In unselected postmenopausal women, the 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a moderate benefit (SMD 0.38, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.71, P = 0.03, 2 studies, 142 women, I² = 0%, low-quality evidence). In the combined analysis, the 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a small benefit (SMD 0.17, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.29, P = 0.008, 3 studies, 1025 women, I² = 20%).For SERMs versus control, in symptomatic or early postmenopausal women the 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a moderate benefit for sexual function in the HT group (SMD 0.23, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.50, P = 0.09, 1 study, 215 women, low-quality evidence). In unselected postmenopausal women, the 95% CI was compatible with small harm to a small benefit (SMD 0.04, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.29, P = 0.72, 1 study, 283 women, low-quality evidence). In the combined analysis, the 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a small benefit (SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.31, P = 0.16, 2 studies, 498 women, I² = 2%).A comparison of SERMs combined with estrogens versus control was only evaluated in symptomatic or early postmenopausal women. The 95% CI was compatible with no effect to a small benefit for sexual function in the HT group (SMD 0.21, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.43, P = 0.05, 1 study, 542 women, moderate-quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: HT treatment with estrogens alone or in combination with progestogens was associated with a small to moderate improvement in sexual function, particularly in pain, when used in women with menopausal symptoms or in early postmenopause (within five years of amenorrhoea), but not in unselected postmenopausal women. Evidence regarding other HTs (synthetic steroids and SERMs) is of low quality and we are uncertain of their effect on sexual function. The current evidence does not suggest an important effect of tibolone or of SERMs alone or combined with estrogens on sexual function. More studies evaluating the effect of synthetic steroids, SERMS and the association of SERM + estrogens would improve the quality of the evidence for the effect of these treatments on sexual function in peri and postmenopausal women. Future studies should also evaluate the effect of HT solely among women with sexual complaints.

摘要

背景

围绝经期和绝经后期会出现许多症状,包括性方面的问题。

目的

评估激素疗法(HT)对围绝经期和绝经后女性性功能的影响。

检索方法

我们在Cochrane月经紊乱与生育力低下小组(MDSG)专业注册库、Cochrane系统评价数据库、医学期刊数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库、护理学与健康领域数据库、心理学文摘数据库、拉丁美洲和加勒比地区卫生科学数据库、美国国立医学图书馆临床试验数据库、当前受控试验库、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台、科学引文索引数据库和OpenGrey中检索文章。最后一次检索于2012年12月进行。

入选标准

我们纳入了比较HT与安慰剂或不干预(对照)的随机对照试验。我们将HT视为单独使用雌激素;雌激素与孕激素联合使用;合成类固醇(如替勃龙);或选择性雌激素受体调节剂(SERM)(如雷洛昔芬、巴多昔芬)。排除了其他可能用于缓解绝经症状的药物的研究。我们纳入了使用任何经过验证的评估工具评估性功能的研究。主要结局是性功能综合评分,各个领域(性唤起和性兴趣、性高潮和疼痛)的评分是次要结局。研究由两位作者独立选择。

数据收集与分析

数据由两位作者独立提取,并由第三位作者进行核对。偏倚风险评估由两位作者独立进行。我们根据需要联系了研究调查人员。使用标准化均数差(SMD)和相对危险度(RR)进行数据分析。我们根据绝经症状的参与者特征对分析进行分层。使用GRADE标准评估主要结局证据的总体质量。

主要结果

检索到2351条记录,从中纳入了27项研究(16393名女性)。“有症状或绝经早期”亚组包括9项研究:围绝经期女性(1项研究)、绝经后36个月内(1项研究)、绝经后5年内(1项研究)、有血管舒缩或其他绝经症状(5项研究)、或有潮热和性功能障碍(1项研究)。“未选择的绝经后女性”亚组包括18项研究,其中包括无论有无绝经症状的女性,并允许纳入末次月经后超过5年的女性。没有研究仅限于有性功能障碍的女性。只有5项研究将性功能作为主要结局进行评估。18项研究被认为存在高偏倚风险,其他9项研究的偏倚风险不明确。20项研究获得了商业资助。

性功能(通过综合评分测量)的结果:

单独使用雌激素与对照相比,在有症状或绝经早期女性中,SMD及95%可信区间显示HT组性功能有小到中度改善(SMD 0.38,95%可信区间0.23至0.54,P<0.00001,3项研究,699名女性,I²=55%,高质量证据)。在未选择的绝经后女性中,95%可信区间显示无效应至小的益处(SMD 0.16,95%可信区间-0.02至0.34,P=0.08,2项研究,478名女性,I²=44%,低质量证据)。由于存在相当大的异质性,未对亚组进行合并。

雌激素与孕激素联合使用与对照相比,在有症状或绝经早期女性中,95%可信区间显示HT组性功能有小到中度改善(SMD

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验