Orlin Anton, Fatoo Aalya, Ehrlich Joshua, D'Amico Donald J, Chan Rv Paul, Kiss Szilárd
Department of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:959-64. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S43450. Epub 2013 May 24.
To describe ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWFA) findings in eyes with white without pressure (WWOP) and in eyes without any obvious peripheral chorioretinal disease, and to determine if a difference exists between these two groups.
A retrospective review of 379 eyes undergoing diagnostic UWFA using the Optos 200Tx imaging system. Eyes were excluded if the quality of the color photograph or UWFA prevented reliable evaluation. Eyes were also excluded if there was any evidence of peripheral retinal or choroidal disease, which was thought to have an effect on UWFA (eg, peripheral background diabetic or hypertensive retinopathy, vein occlusion, or any other peripheral vascular disorder). Eyes were determined to have WWOP, based on a dilated fundus examination and color fundus photography that contained areas of peripheral retinal whitening consistent with the diagnosis. UWFA was evaluated by trained masked graders, and determined to have or not have peripheral vascular leakage and/or staining.
Of the 379 eyes evaluated, 45 eyes were included in the study. Twelve eyes were determined to have peripheral WWOP; 33 eyes did not have WWOP on examination or color fundus photography. Three common UWFA peripheral patterns were visualized. Eyes with and without WWOP were grouped into one of three patterns. The majority of eyes without WWOP demonstrated UWFA pattern one (69.7%), while those in the WWOP group demonstrated pattern three (50%). The distribution of UWFA patterns is statistically different between those with and without WWOP (P = 0.002). In eyes without WWOP, in patients with no documented systemic microvascular disease (diabetes, hypertension), 71.4% of eyes had UWFA pattern one while 14.3% had both patterns two and three.
This study is one of the first to specifically evaluate peripheral vascular leakage/staining in eyes with WWOP as well as in eyes without any obvious peripheral chorioretinal disease. We demonstrate that a significant portion of WWOP eyes exhibit peripheral findings on UWFA (pattern one) compared to eyes without WWOP. Importantly, even in eyes that are apparently unremarkable in the periphery on exam and color photography, UWFA can still show peripheral vascular abnormalities. These results warrant further investigation.
描述无压白瞳症(WWOP)患者及无明显周边脉络膜视网膜疾病患者眼的超广角荧光素血管造影(UWFA)表现,并确定这两组之间是否存在差异。
回顾性分析379例使用Optos 200Tx成像系统进行诊断性UWFA检查的患者的眼部情况。若彩色照片或UWFA的质量妨碍可靠评估,则将该眼排除。若有任何周边视网膜或脉络膜疾病的证据,且认为其会影响UWFA(如周边背景性糖尿病或高血压性视网膜病变、静脉阻塞或任何其他周边血管疾病),则该眼也被排除。根据散瞳眼底检查和彩色眼底照片中包含与诊断相符的周边视网膜变白区域,确定该眼患有WWOP。由经过培训的盲法分级人员评估UWFA,并确定是否存在周边血管渗漏和/或染色。
在评估的379眼中,45眼纳入研究。12眼被确定有周边WWOP;33眼在检查或彩色眼底照片中无WWOP。观察到三种常见的UWFA周边模式。有和无WWOP的眼被分为三种模式之一。大多数无WWOP的眼表现为UWFA模式一(69.7%),而WWOP组的眼表现为模式三(50%)。有和无WWOP的眼的UWFA模式分布在统计学上有差异(P = 0.002)。在无WWOP的眼中,无系统性微血管疾病(糖尿病、高血压)记录的患者中,71.4% 的眼表现为UWFA模式一,而14.3% 的眼同时表现为模式二和模式三。
本研究是首批专门评估WWOP患者以及无明显周边脉络膜视网膜疾病患者眼的周边血管渗漏/染色情况的研究之一。我们证明,与无WWOP的眼相比,相当一部分WWOP眼在UWFA上表现出周边异常(模式一)。重要的是,即使在检查和彩色照片中周边看似正常的眼中