• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性对孕期选择染色体核型分析与快速靶向检测的态度。

Women's Attitudes towards the Option to Choose between Karyotyping and Rapid Targeted Testing during Pregnancy.

作者信息

Kooper Angelique J A, Smeets Dominique F C M, Feenstra Ilse, Wijnberger Lia D E, Rijnders Robbert J P, Quartero Rik W P, Boekkooi Peter F, van Vugt John M G, Smits Arie P T

机构信息

Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;2013:636459. doi: 10.1155/2013/636459. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1155/2013/636459
PMID:23737796
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3657422/
Abstract

Objectives. Pregnant women, referred because of an increased risk of fetal Down syndrome, who underwent an invasive prenatal procedure were offered a choice between karyotyping and rapid targeted testing. This study aims to assess women's attitudes and experiences towards what option to choose. Methods. A retrospective multicentre survey (2008-2010) was conducted among 1370 women. General questions were asked about decision making issues, followed by personal questions about their experiences in choice making, test preference, influence of others, and possible regrets. Results. In total, 90.1% of the respondents (N = 825) indicated that pregnant women are able to choose, although 33.1% stated that the choice can best be made by a professional. 18.4% indicated that making a choice places a burden on women. In 96.4%, respondents preferred to have the option to choose again in case of a next pregnancy, whereas 2.7% preferred the choice to be made by a professional. Regret was indicated by 1.2%. Decision making was influenced by others in 64.9%. A slightly higher preference for karyotyping was indicated by 52.7% of the respondents. Conclusions. Positive attitudes and experiences were expressed towards the option to choose. Respondents took decisions freely, although sometimes influenced by a partner or a professional, to follow their individual perspectives.

摘要

目的。因胎儿唐氏综合征风险增加而转诊的孕妇,若接受侵入性产前检查,可在核型分析和快速靶向检测之间进行选择。本研究旨在评估女性对于选择何种检查的态度和经历。方法。对1370名女性进行了一项回顾性多中心调查(2008 - 2010年)。询问了有关决策问题的一般性问题,随后是关于她们在选择过程中的经历、检查偏好、他人影响以及可能的遗憾等个人问题。结果。总共90.1%的受访者(N = 825)表示孕妇能够做出选择,尽管33.1%的人表示最好由专业人员做出选择。18.4%的人表示做出选择给女性带来负担。在96.4%的人中,受访者希望下次怀孕时能再次有选择的机会,而2.7%的人希望由专业人员做出选择。有1.2%的人表示有遗憾。64.9%的人的决策受到他人影响。52.7%的受访者对核型分析的偏好略高。结论。对选择这一选项表达了积极的态度和经历。受访者自由做出决定,尽管有时会受到伴侣或专业人员的影响,以遵循他们各自的观点。

相似文献

1
Women's Attitudes towards the Option to Choose between Karyotyping and Rapid Targeted Testing during Pregnancy.女性对孕期选择染色体核型分析与快速靶向检测的态度。
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;2013:636459. doi: 10.1155/2013/636459. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
2
Attitudes of women of childbearing age towards prenatal diagnosis in southeastern France.法国东南部育龄妇女对产前诊断的态度。
Prenat Diagn. 1993 Jul;13(7):613-27. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970130712.
3
Facilitating autonomous, confident and satisfying choices: a mixed-method study of women's choice-making in prenatal screening for common aneuploidies.促进自主、自信和满意的选择:一项混合方法研究,探讨了女性在常见非整倍体产前筛查中的决策过程。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 2;18(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1752-y.
4
Women's Attitudes Toward Invasive and Noninvasive Testing When Facing a High Risk of Fetal Down Syndrome.当面临胎儿唐氏综合征高风险时,女性对有创性和非侵入性检测的态度。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e191062. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1062.
5
Pregnant women's attitudes and decision-making regarding prenatal Down syndrome screening and diagnosis: scale development and validation.孕妇对唐氏综合征产前筛查和诊断的态度及决策:量表的编制与验证。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jul 14;20(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03093-6.
6
How did you choose a mode of birth? Experiences of nulliparous women from Turkey.你是如何选择分娩方式的?来自土耳其的初产妇的经历。
Women Birth. 2016 Aug;29(4):359-67. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
7
Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing. Part II-women's perspectives.荷兰实验室对无创产前检测进行评估的试验。第二部分——女性视角。
Prenat Diagn. 2016 Dec;36(12):1091-1098. doi: 10.1002/pd.4941. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
8
Perceptions, motivations and decision regret surrounding preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.围绕胚胎植入前非整倍体遗传学检测的认知、动机和决策后悔。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Sep 1;35(9):2047-2057. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa154.
9
Women's knowledge, concerns and psychological reactions before undergoing an invasive procedure for prenatal karyotyping.女性在接受侵入性产前染色体核型分析检查前的知识、担忧及心理反应。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Oct;14(4):267-72. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.14040267.x.
10
Rethinking autonomy in the context of prenatal screening decision-making.在产前筛查决策背景下重新思考自主性。
Prenat Diagn. 2008 Feb;28(2):115-20. doi: 10.1002/pd.1920.

引用本文的文献

1
The Psychological Challenges of Replacing Conventional Karyotyping with Genomic SNP Array Analysis in Prenatal Testing.产前检测中用基因组SNP阵列分析取代传统核型分析的心理挑战。
J Clin Med. 2014 Jul 3;3(3):713-23. doi: 10.3390/jcm3030713.

本文引用的文献

1
The social gradient in doctor-patient communication.医患沟通中的社会梯度。
Int J Equity Health. 2012 Mar 12;11:12. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-11-12.
2
Rapid aneuploidy detection or karyotyping? Ethical reflection.快速非整倍体检测还是核型分析?伦理反思。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2011 Oct;19(10):1020-5. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.82. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
3
Economic evaluation of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a cost-minimization analysis.多重连接依赖探针扩增和核型分析在产前诊断中的经济学评价:成本最小化分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Jan;285(1):67-75. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-1921-y. Epub 2011 May 19.
4
Rapid methods for targeted prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies.常见染色体非整倍体的靶向性产前快速诊断方法。
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Apr;16(2):81-7. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2011.01.003.
5
Rapid testing versus karyotyping in Down's syndrome screening: cost-effectiveness and detection of clinically significant chromosome abnormalities.唐氏综合征筛查中快速检测与核型分析:成本效益及临床显著染色体异常的检出率。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2011 Jan;19(1):3-9. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.138. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
6
Individualized choice in prenatal diagnosis: the impact of karyotyping and standalone rapid aneuploidy detection on quality of life.个体化选择在产前诊断中的应用:核型分析和独立快速非整倍体检测对生活质量的影响。
Prenat Diagn. 2010 Oct;30(10):928-36. doi: 10.1002/pd.2585.
7
Comparison of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis.多重连接依赖探针扩增与核型分析在产前诊断中的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Feb;115(2 Pt 1):297-303. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181cbc652.
8
Karyotyping or rapid aneuploidy detection in prenatal diagnosis? The different views of users and providers of prenatal care.产前诊断中采用核型分析还是快速非整倍体检测?产前护理使用者与提供者的不同观点。
BJOG. 2009 Sep;116(10):1396-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02229.x. Epub 2009 Jun 29.
9
Is informed choice in prenatal testing universally valued? A population-based survey in Europe and Asia.产前检测中的知情选择是否得到普遍重视?一项在欧洲和亚洲开展的基于人群的调查。
BJOG. 2009 Jun;116(7):880-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02174.x. Epub 2009 Apr 15.
10
Rapid prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies by QF-PCR, results of 9 years of clinical experience.通过QF-PCR技术进行常见染色体非整倍体的快速产前诊断:9年临床经验结果
Prenat Diagn. 2009 Jan;29(1):40-9. doi: 10.1002/pd.2192.