Suppr超能文献

腰椎穿刺引流术治疗重症细菌性脑膜炎。

Lumbar drainage for the treatment of severe bacterial meningitis.

机构信息

Neurological Intensive Care Unit, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada,

出版信息

Neurocrit Care. 2013 Oct;19(2):199-205. doi: 10.1007/s12028-013-9853-y.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and effectiveness of lumbar drains as adjuvant therapy in severe bacterial meningitis, and compare it to standard treatment.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of all patients above the age of 18 years with bacterial meningitis and altered mental status admitted to the Montreal Neurological Hospital Intensive Care Unit from January 2000 to December 2010.

PATIENTS

Thirty-seven patients were identified using clinical and cerebrospinal fluid criteria. Patients were divided into lumbar drain (LD) (n = 11) and conventional therapy (no LD) (n = 26) groups.

MEASUREMENTS

Outcomes were assessed using meningitis-related mortality and the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 1 and 3 months.

OUTCOMES

All patients received broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, 84% received steroids. There was no significant difference in mean age, type of bacteria, or time from arrival in ER to initiation of therapy. There was significantly less co-morbidity (24% healthy vs. 18.1%) and coma (GCS < 8 34.6 vs. 54.5%) in the conventional therapy group, as well as a longer duration of symptoms prior to admission (mean 1.34 ± 1.24 vs. 2.19 ± 2.34 days). The mean opening pressure was high in all patients (20-55 cm H2O in the LD and 12-60 cm H2O in the no LD). Mean time from arrival in ER to insertion of the lumbar drain was 37 h. Lumbar drains were set for a maximum drainage of 10 cc/h and an ICP below 10 mmHg. Despite greater clinical severity, the LD group had 0% mortality and 91% of the patients achieved a GOS of 4-5. The non-LD group had 15.4% mortality and only 60% achieved a GOS of 4-5. No adverse events were associated with LD therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the use of lumbar drainage in adult patients with severe bacterial meningitis was safe, and likely contributed to the low mortality and morbidity.

摘要

目的

评估腰椎引流作为辅助治疗严重细菌性脑膜炎的安全性和有效性,并将其与标准治疗进行比较。

设计

对 2000 年 1 月至 2010 年 12 月期间在蒙特利尔神经学医院重症监护病房因细菌性脑膜炎和意识改变而入院的年龄大于 18 岁的所有患者进行回顾性队列研究。

患者

根据临床和脑脊液标准,共确定 37 例患者。患者分为腰椎引流(LD)组(n = 11)和常规治疗(无 LD)组(n = 26)。

测量方法

使用与脑膜炎相关的死亡率和格拉斯哥结局量表(GOS)在 1 个月和 3 个月时评估结果。

结果

所有患者均接受广谱抗生素治疗,84%接受类固醇治疗。LD 组和常规治疗组之间的平均年龄、细菌类型或从急诊室到达至开始治疗的时间均无显著差异。常规治疗组的合并症(24%健康患者 vs. 18.1%)和昏迷(GCS < 8,34.6% vs. 54.5%)发生率显著较低,且入院前症状持续时间较长(LD 组平均 1.34 ± 1.24 天 vs. 2.19 ± 2.34 天)。所有患者的平均颅内压均较高(LD 组为 20-55cmH2O,常规治疗组为 12-60cmH2O)。从急诊室到达至插入腰椎引流的平均时间为 37 小时。腰椎引流的最大引流速度为 10cc/h,颅内压低于 10mmHg。尽管临床严重程度较高,但 LD 组的死亡率为 0%,91%的患者达到 GOS 4-5 级。常规治疗组的死亡率为 15.4%,只有 60%的患者达到 GOS 4-5 级。LD 治疗无不良事件。

结论

在这项研究中,腰椎引流在成人严重细菌性脑膜炎患者中的应用是安全的,可能有助于降低死亡率和发病率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验