Gargari M, Prete V, Pujia M, Ceruso F M
Department of Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy ; Department of Dentistry "Fra G.B. Orsenigo Ospedale San Pietro F.B.F.", Rome, Italy.
Oral Implantol (Rome). 2013 Mar 19;5(4):86-91. Print 2012 Oct.
Development of patient-based questionnaire about aesthetic and functional differences between overdentures implant-supported and overdentures tooth-supported. Study of 43 patients with a follow up of 1 year.
The aim of this study is to compare functional efficiency and patients satisfaction between tooth-supported and implant-supported overdenture through a questionnaire that accurately reflects the real concerns of patients with dental prosthesis.
Forty-three patients were selected from the out patient clinic, Department of Dentistry "Fra G.B. Orsenigo Ospedale San Pietro F.B.F.", Rome, Italy. Their age were ranging from 61 to 83 years. Eighteen patients were rehabilitated with overdentures supported by natural teeth and twenty-five with overdentures implant-supported. DISCUSSION AND RESULT: The questionnaire proposed one year after the insertion of the prosthetis has showed that there isn't difference statistically significant in terms of function, phonetics and aesthetics between overdenture implant-supported and tooth-supported.
The results of the questionnaire showed that the patients generally had a high level of satisfaction concern to the masticatory function, esthetics and phonetics. In addition, on average, they haven't difficulty in removal and insertion of the denture and in oral hygiene. They haven't in both groups problems related to fractures.
开发关于种植体支持的覆盖义齿和牙支持的覆盖义齿之间美学和功能差异的患者问卷。对43例患者进行研究，随访1年。
本研究的目的是通过一份准确反映假牙患者实际担忧的问卷，比较牙支持和种植体支持的覆盖义齿之间的功能效率和患者满意度。
从意大利罗马“Fra G.B. Orsenigo Ospedale San Pietro F.B.F.”牙科门诊选取43例患者。他们的年龄在61至83岁之间。18例患者采用天然牙支持的覆盖义齿修复，25例采用种植体支持的覆盖义齿修复。讨论与结果：义齿植入一年后提出的问卷显示，种植体支持的覆盖义齿和牙支持的覆盖义齿在功能、语音和美学方面没有统计学上的显著差异。
问卷结果显示，患者对咀嚼功能、美学和语音的满意度普遍较高。此外，平均而言，他们在义齿的摘戴和口腔卫生方面没有困难。两组均未出现与骨折相关的问题。
