Ashraf Qurat U A, Khan Asmat Ullah, Khattak Rehman Mehmood, Ali Muhammad, Shaikh Rehan Sadiq, Ali Muhammad, Iqbal Furhan
Department of Zoology, Institute of Pure and Applied Biology, Zoology Division, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan.
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2013 Sep;4(5):395-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
The present study was designed to use a PCR-RFLP protocol for the molecular detection of Anaplasma sp. and to compare its prevalence in blood samples from buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) from 2 provinces of Pakistan and to determine the risk factors associated with the spread of Anaplasma infection. A total of 281 blood samples were collected from adults and calves of buffaloes from 4 sampling sites in Southern Punjab (Bahawalnagar, Burewala, Layyah, and Multan districts) and 2 in Khyber Pukhtoon Khwa (Peshawer and Kohat districts) from randomly selected herds. Data on the characteristics of the animals (gender, age, tick presence or absence, prior treatment for Anaplasma infection) and the herd (location, size, dogs associated with the herds, tick burden of dogs associated with the herds) were collected through questionnaires. One hundred and sixteen blood samples (41% of total) produced the 577-base pairs DNA fragment specific for the 16S rRNA gene of Anaplasma sp. by PCR amplification. Twenty of the 116 Anaplasma sp.-positive PCR products were confirmed to be Anaplasma marginale upon restriction with BssNa1, specific to cut A. marginale sequences. ANOVA results revealed a highly significant association between sampling sites and prevalence of Anaplasma sp. (P<0.001) indicating that Anaplasma sp. prevalence was variable among all 6 sampling sites. Risk factor analysis indicated that the association of dogs with the herd was the only significant (P=0.029) risk factor associated with the spread of Anaplasma sp. in buffaloes while sex, age, presence of ticks on animals or herd size showed no association with Anaplasma infection.
本研究旨在采用聚合酶链反应-限制性片段长度多态性(PCR-RFLP)方法对无浆体属(Anaplasma sp.)进行分子检测,比较巴基斯坦两个省份水牛(Bubalus bubalis)血液样本中该病原体的流行情况,并确定与无浆体感染传播相关的风险因素。从旁遮普省南部的4个采样点(巴哈瓦尔布尔、布勒瓦拉、莱雅和木尔坦地区)以及开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦省的2个采样点(白沙瓦和科哈特地区)随机选取牛群,采集了281份成年和幼年水牛的血液样本。通过问卷调查收集了动物特征(性别、年龄、是否有蜱虫、既往无浆体感染治疗情况)和牛群特征(地点、规模、与牛群相关的狗、与牛群相关的狗的蜱虫负担)的数据。通过PCR扩增,116份血液样本(占总数的41%)产生了无浆体属16S rRNA基因特异的577碱基对DNA片段。在用特异性切割边缘无浆体(A. marginale)序列的BssNa1酶切后,116份无浆体属PCR阳性产物中有20份被确认为边缘无浆体。方差分析结果显示,采样点与无浆体属的流行率之间存在高度显著关联(P<0.001),表明在所有6个采样点中无浆体属的流行率各不相同。风险因素分析表明,狗与牛群的关联是与水牛中无浆体属传播相关的唯一显著风险因素(P=0.029),而性别、年龄、动物身上是否有蜱虫或牛群规模与无浆体感染均无关联。