• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

围生期出血风险分层标准的临床验证。

Clinical validation of risk stratification criteria for peripartum hemorrhage.

机构信息

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, the Departments of Anesthesiology and Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, and the Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;122(1):120-126. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182941c78.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182941c78
PMID:23743452
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative risk groups predicted the risk of peripartum hemorrhage and to determine which women should have peripartum pretransfusion testing performed.

METHODS

Over a 1-year period, 10,134 women who delivered at a single hospital were included in this retrospective cohort study. The majority of the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative risk factors were assessed retrospectively. Each mother was assigned to one of the three peripartum hemorrhage risk groups according to the guidelines. The individual peripartum hemorrhage risk factors and the three risk groups correlated with the occurrence of a significant peripartum hemorrhage (a hemorrhage requiring transfusion of 1 unit or more of red blood cells). Other risk factors for peripartum hemorrhage were assessed and a modified high-risk category was created.

RESULTS

The incidence of a significant peripartum hemorrhage within each group was as follows: low (0.8%); medium (2.0%); and high (7.3%). High included an increase that was statistically significant (P<.001). All of the assessed California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative risk criteria were significantly associated with an increased peripartum hemorrhage rate (P≤.02) except macrosomnia and morbid obesity. Other risk factors not included in the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative criteria (preterm delivery, uterine rupture, hypertension, previous cesarean delivery, and a model of accreta or percreta) also correlated with peripartum hemorrhage. This modified risk group included 85% of those women with significant hemorrhage; however, 45% of women were included and only 2.6% of this modified group hemorrhaged.

CONCLUSION

The California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative risk stratification showed an increasing risk for transfusion as the risk grade increased. Women in the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative high-risk group (or as determined by their providers) should have pretransfusion testing performed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

摘要

目的

确定加利福尼亚产妇质量护理协作组的风险因素是否预测了围产期出血的风险,并确定哪些妇女应进行围产期输血前检测。

方法

在为期一年的时间里,这项回顾性队列研究纳入了在一家医院分娩的 10134 名妇女。大部分加利福尼亚产妇质量护理协作组的风险因素都是回顾性评估的。根据指南,每位母亲被分配到围产期出血风险组中的一个。个体围产期出血的风险因素和三个风险组与发生显著围产期出血(需要输注 1 个单位或更多红细胞的出血)相关。评估了其他围产期出血的风险因素,并创建了一个改良的高危类别。

结果

每个组中显著围产期出血的发生率如下:低危(0.8%);中危(2.0%);高危(7.3%)。高危组的发生率显著增加(P<.001)。除巨儿症和病态肥胖外,所有评估的加利福尼亚产妇质量护理协作组风险标准均与围产期出血发生率增加显著相关(P≤.02)。加利福尼亚产妇质量护理协作组标准中未包括的其他风险因素(早产、子宫破裂、高血压、既往剖宫产术和粘连或植入性胎盘模型)也与围产期出血相关。这个改良的风险组包括 85%有显著出血的妇女;然而,有 45%的妇女被包括在内,只有 2.6%的改良组出血。

结论

加利福尼亚产妇质量护理协作组的风险分层显示,随着风险等级的增加,输血的风险增加。加利福尼亚产妇质量护理协作组高危组(或由其提供者确定)的妇女应进行输血前检测。

证据水平

II。

相似文献

1
Clinical validation of risk stratification criteria for peripartum hemorrhage.围生期出血风险分层标准的临床验证。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;122(1):120-126. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182941c78.
2
Improvements and limitations in developing multivariate models of hemorrhage and transfusion risk for the obstetric population.产科人群出血和输血风险的多变量模型的改进和局限性。
Transfusion. 2021 Feb;61(2):423-434. doi: 10.1111/trf.16216. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
3
Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a 10-year review at the Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney.急诊围产期子宫切除术:悉尼皇家妇女医院的10年回顾
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 Jun;51(3):210-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2010.01278.x. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
4
[Risk factors of peripartum hysterectomy in placenta previa: a retrospective study of 3 840 cases].前置胎盘产妇围产期子宫切除术的危险因素:3840例回顾性研究
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Jul 25;51(7):498-502. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2016.07.004.
5
Incidence of emergency peripartum hysterectomy in Ain-shams University Maternity Hospital, Egypt: a retrospective study.埃及艾因夏姆斯大学妇产医院围产期紧急子宫切除术的发生率:一项回顾性研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Nov;290(5):891-6. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3306-5. Epub 2014 Jun 15.
6
Predicting peripartum blood transfusion: focusing on pre-pregnancy characteristics.预测围产期输血:关注孕前特征。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Dec 5;19(1):477. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2646-3.
7
Emergency Peripartum Hysterectomy as Postpartum Hemorrhage Treatment: Incidence, Risk factors, and Complications.紧急围产期子宫切除术治疗产后出血:发生率、危险因素及并发症
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2014 Jan-Mar;52(193):668-76.
8
Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: 2-year experiences in non-tertiary center.急诊围产期子宫切除术:非三级中心的两年经验
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Nov;292(5):1019-25. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3740-z. Epub 2015 May 1.
9
Confirmed severe maternal morbidity is associated with high rate of preterm delivery.确诊的严重孕产妇发病与早产率高有关。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;215(2):233.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.026. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
10
Placenta percreta is associated with more frequent severe maternal morbidity than placenta accreta.胎盘植入比胎盘粘连更常导致严重的产妇发病率。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;219(2):193.e1-193.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.049. Epub 2018 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Risk-Scoring System for Prediction of Blood Transfusion During Hospitalization for Delivery.用于预测分娩住院期间输血的风险评分系统的开发。
O G Open. 2025 Apr;2(2). doi: 10.1097/og9.0000000000000078. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
2
Integrating SHAP analysis with machine learning to predict postpartum hemorrhage in vaginal births.将SHAP分析与机器学习相结合以预测阴道分娩中的产后出血。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 May 3;25(1):529. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07633-w.
3
Postpartum hemorrhage: risk factors for severe blood loss, surgical intervention and peripartum hysterectomy.
产后出血:严重失血、手术干预及围产期子宫切除术的危险因素
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Feb 11. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-07969-w.
4
Hemorrhage risk score and peripartum quantified blood loss.出血风险评分与围产期定量失血
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2024 Nov 5;38(1):7-14. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2024.2419193. eCollection 2025.
5
Prolonged second stage of labor and risk of postpartum hemorrhage in nullipara with epidural anesthesia and vaginal delivery: A cohort study with propensity score analysis.初产妇硬膜外麻醉下阴道分娩时第二产程延长与产后出血风险:一项倾向评分分析的队列研究
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jan;168(1):141-148. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15816. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
6
Novel biomarkers for prediction of atonic postpartum hemorrhage among 'low-risk' women in labor.用于预测分娩“低危”产妇产后无力性出血的新型生物标志物。
Front Immunol. 2024 Jul 11;15:1416990. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1416990. eCollection 2024.
7
Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Maternal Hemorrhage and Transfusion: Model Development Study.用于预测孕产妇出血和输血的机器学习模型:模型开发研究
JMIR Bioinform Biotechnol. 2024 Feb 5;5:e52059. doi: 10.2196/52059.
8
Characteristics and treatment for severe postpartum haemorrhage in different midwifery hospitals in one district of Beijing in China: an institution-based, retrospective cohort study.中国北京市某区不同助产机构严重产后出血的特征及治疗:基于机构的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 3;14(4):e077709. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077709.
9
A comparative analysis of Postpartum Hemorrhage incidence and influencing factors between nulliparous and multiparous women in Hunan Province, China: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.中国湖南省初产妇与经产妇产后出血发生率及影响因素的比较分析:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Jan 10;38:102580. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102580. eCollection 2024 Feb.
10
Validation of Three Models for Prediction of Blood Transfusion during Cesarean Delivery Admission.剖宫产入院时输血预测的三种模型的验证。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e3391-e3400. doi: 10.1055/a-2234-8171. Epub 2023 Dec 22.