Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ann Neurol. 2013 Aug;74(2):266-74. doi: 10.1002/ana.23924. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
Controversy surrounds the safety of intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in ischemic stroke patients treated with warfarin. The European tPA license precludes its use in anticoagulated patients altogether. American guidelines accept IV tPA use with an international normalized ratio (INR) ≤ 1.7. The influence of warfarin on symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH), arterial recanalization, and long-term functional outcome in stroke thrombolysis remains unclear.
We analyzed data from 45,074 patients treated with IV tPA enrolled in the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke (SITS) International Stroke Thrombolysis Register. A total of 768 patients had baseline warfarin treatment with INR ≤ 1.7. Outcome measures were SICH, arterial recanalization, mortality, and functional independence at 3 months.
Patients on warfarin with INR ≤ 1.7 were older, had more comorbidities, and had more severe strokes compared to patients without warfarin. There were no significant differences between patients with and without warfarin in SICH rates (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.72-2.11 per SITS-MOST; aOR = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.82-1.70 per European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study II) after adjustment for age, stroke severity, and comorbidities. Neither did warfarin independently influence mortality (aOR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.83-1.35) or functional independence at 3 months (aOR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.81-1.24). Arterial recanalization by computed tomography/magnetic resonance angiography trended higher in warfarin patients (62% [37 of 59] vs 55% [776/1,475], p = 0.066). Recanalization approximated by disappearance at 22 to 36 hours of a baseline hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign was increased (63% [124 of 196] vs 55% [3,901 of 7,099], p = 0.022).
Warfarin treatment with INR ≤ 1.7 did not increase the risk for SICH or death, and had no impact on long-term functional outcome in patients treated with IV tPA for acute ischemic stroke.
在接受华法林治疗的缺血性脑卒中患者中,静脉注射(IV)组织型纤溶酶原激活物(tPA)的安全性存在争议。欧洲的 tPA 许可证完全禁止在抗凝患者中使用。美国指南接受 INR≤1.7 的 IV tPA 治疗。华法林对溶栓治疗的症状性颅内出血(SICH)、动脉再通和卒中溶栓后的长期功能结局的影响仍不清楚。
我们分析了 45074 例接受 IV tPA 治疗的患者的数据,这些患者均来自 Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke(SITS)国际卒中溶栓登记处。共有 768 例患者在基线时有华法林治疗,INR≤1.7。结局指标为 SICH、动脉再通、死亡率和 3 个月时的功能独立性。
与未使用华法林的患者相比,INR≤1.7 的华法林患者年龄更大,合并症更多,卒中更严重。在 SICH 发生率方面,华法林组与未使用华法林组之间无显著差异(校正后的优势比[SOR]为 1.23,95%置信区间[CI]为 0.72-2.11,每 SITS-MOST;SOR 为 1.26,95%CI 为 0.82-1.70,每欧洲合作急性卒中研究 II),调整年龄、卒中严重程度和合并症后。华法林也不独立影响死亡率(SOR=1.05,95%CI=0.83-1.35)或 3 个月时的功能独立性(SOR=1.01,95%CI=0.81-1.24)。华法林患者的 CT/MRI 血管造影动脉再通率有升高趋势(62%[59 例中的 37 例]vs.55%[1475 例中的 776 例],p=0.066)。基线高密度大脑中动脉征消失 22-36 小时的再通率更高(63%[196 例中的 124 例]vs.55%[7099 例中的 3901 例],p=0.022)。
在接受 IV tPA 治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的患者中,INR≤1.7 的华法林治疗并未增加 SICH 或死亡的风险,且对长期功能结局无影响。