• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性脑卒中后谵妄的早期预测。

An early prediction of delirium in the acute phase after stroke.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, St Elisabeth Hospital, , Tilburg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;85(4):431-4. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-304920. Epub 2013 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1136/jnnp-2013-304920
PMID:23744891
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We developed and validated a risk score to predict delirium after stroke which was derived from our prospective cohort study where several risk factors were identified.

METHODS

Using the β coefficients from the logistic regression model, we allocated a score to values of the risk factors. In the first model, stroke severity, stroke subtype, infection, stroke localisation, pre-existent cognitive decline and age were included. The second model included age, stroke severity, stroke subtype and infection. A third model only included age and stroke severity. The risk score was validated in an independent dataset.

RESULTS

The area under the curve (AUC) of the first model was 0.85 (sensitivity 86%, specificity 74%). In the second model, the AUC was 0.84 (sensitivity 80%, specificity 75%). The third model had an AUC of 0.80 (sensitivity 79%, specificity 73%). In the validation set, model 1 had an AUC of 0.83 (sensitivity 78%, specificity 77%). The second had an AUC of 0.83 (sensitivity 76%, specificity 81%). The third model gave an AUC of 0.82 (sensitivity of 73%, specificity 75%). We conclude that model 2 is easy to use in clinical practice and slightly better than model 3 and, therefore, was used to create risk tables to use as a tool in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

A model including age, stroke severity, stroke subtype and infection can be used to identify patients who have a high risk to develop delirium in the early phase of stroke.

摘要

背景

我们开发并验证了一种预测中风后谵妄的风险评分,该评分源自我们的前瞻性队列研究,其中确定了几个风险因素。

方法

使用逻辑回归模型的β系数,我们为风险因素的值分配了一个分数。在第一个模型中,纳入了中风严重程度、中风亚型、感染、中风部位、预先存在的认知减退和年龄。第二个模型包括年龄、中风严重程度、中风亚型和感染。第三个模型仅包括年龄和中风严重程度。该风险评分在独立数据集上得到了验证。

结果

第一个模型的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.85(敏感性 86%,特异性 74%)。在第二个模型中,AUC 为 0.84(敏感性 80%,特异性 75%)。第三个模型的 AUC 为 0.80(敏感性 79%,特异性 73%)。在验证集中,模型 1 的 AUC 为 0.83(敏感性 78%,特异性 77%)。第二个模型的 AUC 为 0.83(敏感性 76%,特异性 81%)。第三个模型的 AUC 为 0.82(敏感性 73%,特异性 75%)。我们得出结论,模型 2 在临床实践中易于使用,略优于模型 3,因此被用于创建风险表,作为临床实践中的工具。

结论

包括年龄、中风严重程度、中风亚型和感染在内的模型可用于识别中风早期发生谵妄风险较高的患者。

相似文献

1
An early prediction of delirium in the acute phase after stroke.急性脑卒中后谵妄的早期预测。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;85(4):431-4. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-304920. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
2
Test accuracy of short screening tests for diagnosis of delirium or cognitive impairment in an acute stroke unit setting.在急性脑卒中单元环境中,用于诊断谵妄或认知障碍的简短筛查测试的准确性。
Stroke. 2013 Nov;44(11):3078-83. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001724. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
3
Cognitive Impairment after Mild Stroke: Development and Validation of the SIGNAL2 Risk Score.轻度中风后的认知障碍:SIGNAL2风险评分的制定与验证
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;49(4):1169-77. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150736.
4
Identifying Delirium Early after Stroke: A New Prediction Tool for the Intensive Care Unit.识别脑卒中后早期谵妄:重症监护病房的一种新预测工具。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Nov;29(11):105219. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105219. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
5
PRospective Observational POLIsh Study on post-stroke delirium (PROPOLIS): methodology of hospital-based cohort study on delirium prevalence, predictors and diagnostic tools.波兰中风后谵妄前瞻性观察研究(PROPOLIS):关于谵妄患病率、预测因素及诊断工具的基于医院的队列研究方法
BMC Neurol. 2015 Jun 19;15:94. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0351-z.
6
Incidence and predictors for delirium in hospitalized elderly patients: a retrospective cohort study.住院老年患者谵妄的发生率及预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Acta Med Indones. 2012 Oct;44(4):290-7.
7
Development of a clinical score, PANDA, to predict delirium in stroke care unit.开发一种临床评分系统PANDA,以预测卒中监护病房中的谵妄。
J Neurol Sci. 2020 Aug 15;415:116956. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.116956. Epub 2020 May 30.
8
Relationship between cognitive status at admission and incident delirium in older medical inpatients.入院时认知状态与老年住院患者新发谵妄的关系。
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2010 Summer;22(3):329-37. doi: 10.1176/jnp.2010.22.3.329.
9
Poststroke delirium incidence and outcomes: validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU).卒中后谵妄的发生率和结局:重症监护病房意识模糊评估方法(CAM-ICU)的验证。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):484-90. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232da12.
10
Pre-admission CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and R2CHADS2 Scores on Severity and Functional Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke with Atrial Fibrillation.房颤急性缺血性卒中患者入院前CHADS2、CHA2DS2-VASc及R2CHADS2评分与严重程度及功能转归的关系
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015 Jul;24(7):1629-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.03.036. Epub 2015 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Determining the ground truth for the prediction of delirium in adult patients in acute care: a scoping review.确定急性护理中成年患者谵妄预测的真实情况:一项范围综述
JAMIA Open. 2025 May 26;8(3):ooaf037. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf037. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Predicting delirium in acute ischemic stroke: the PREDELIS score.预测急性缺血性卒中患者的谵妄:PREDELIS评分
J Neurol. 2025 May 11;272(6):391. doi: 10.1007/s00415-025-13073-5.
3
Delirium following mechanical thrombectomy for ischemic stroke - individuals at risk, imaging biomarkers and prognosis.
缺血性卒中机械取栓术后的谵妄——高危个体、影像学生物标志物及预后
Front Aging Neurosci. 2025 Feb 14;17:1486726. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1486726. eCollection 2025.
4
Early Complications After Mild to Moderate Ischemic Stroke and Impact on 3-Month Outcome: The Multicenter Prospective Stroke Unit Plus Cohort Study.轻度至中度缺血性中风后的早期并发症及其对3个月预后的影响:多中心前瞻性卒中单元加队列研究
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Feb 18;14(4):e032068. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032068. Epub 2025 Feb 8.
5
Management of delirium in acute stroke patients: a position paper by the Austrian Stroke Society on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.急性卒中患者谵妄的管理:奥地利卒中协会关于预防、诊断和治疗的立场文件
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2024 Aug 19;17:17562864241258788. doi: 10.1177/17562864241258788. eCollection 2024.
6
The RAPID-score: Risk Assessment and PredIction of Delirium in acute stroke patients based on very early clinical parameters.RAPID评分:基于极早期临床参数对急性卒中患者谵妄的风险评估与预测
Front Neurol. 2023 Dec 15;14:1306520. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1306520. eCollection 2023.
7
Delirium detection using wearable sensors and machine learning in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.使用可穿戴传感器和机器学习检测脑出血患者的谵妄
Front Neurol. 2023 Jun 9;14:1135472. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1135472. eCollection 2023.
8
Association of delirium and spatial neglect in patients with right-hemisphere stroke.右半球卒中患者谵妄与空间忽视的关联。
PM R. 2023 Sep;15(9):1075-1082. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12922. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
9
European Stroke Organisation and European Academy of Neurology joint guidelines on post-stroke cognitive impairment.欧洲卒中组织和欧洲神经病学学会关于卒中后认知障碍的联合指南。
Eur Stroke J. 2021 Sep;6(3):I-XXXVIII. doi: 10.1177/23969873211042192. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
10
Prognostic rules for predicting cognitive syndromes following stroke: A systematic review.预测中风后认知综合征的预后规则:一项系统综述。
Eur Stroke J. 2021 Mar;6(1):18-27. doi: 10.1177/2396987321997045. Epub 2021 Feb 23.