• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沙特阿拉伯费萨尔国王大学医学生的评估偏好

Medical students' assessment preferences at King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia.

作者信息

Amin Tarek Tawfik, Kaliyadan Feroze, Al-Muhaidib Nouria Saab

机构信息

Community Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Adv Med Educ Pract. 2011 Mar 10;2:95-103. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S12950. Print 2011.

DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S12950
PMID:23745080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3661244/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the preferred methods for assessment among medical students at both preclinical and clinical stages of medical education and the possible correlates that promote these preferences.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

All medical students from the third year onwards were surveyed. A self-administered anonymous questionnaire was designed to gather information on the preferred assessment method for course achievement. The preferred methods were also evaluated in relation to cognitive functions. Preference for specific exam format, in the form of multiple choices, short essay questions, or both, and the stated reasons for that preference, was also included in the questionnaire.

RESULTS

Out of 310 questionnaires distributed, 238 were returned. Written tests, projects, portfolios, and take home exams were the preferred modes for assessing students' achievements in a course; oral tests including a viva voce were the least preferred type of assessment. Questions that tested the domains of 'understanding' and 'application' were the most preferred type while those entailing 'analysis' were the least preferred. Multiple choice question format was the most preferred type of question (68.7%) at both pre- and clinical stages.

CONCLUSION

Students' assessments at the College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia, do not use the full range of cognitive domains. The emphasis on higher domains for medical students' assessment incorporating critical thinking should increase as the students' progress through their medical courses.

摘要

目的

评估医学教育临床前和临床阶段医学生中首选的评估方法,以及促成这些偏好的可能相关因素。

对象与方法

对三年级及以上的所有医学生进行调查。设计了一份自填式匿名问卷,以收集有关课程成绩首选评估方法的信息。还针对认知功能对首选方法进行了评估。问卷中还包括对特定考试形式(以多项选择题、短文问题或两者形式)的偏好以及该偏好的陈述理由。

结果

在分发的310份问卷中,收回238份。笔试、项目、档案袋和带回家考试是评估学生课程成绩的首选方式;包括口试在内的口试是最不受欢迎的评估类型。测试“理解”和“应用”领域的问题是最受欢迎的类型,而需要“分析”的问题是最不受欢迎的。在临床前和临床阶段,多项选择题形式都是最受欢迎的问题类型(68.7%)。

结论

沙特阿拉伯费萨尔国王大学医学院对学生的评估未涵盖认知领域的全部范围。随着医学生在医学课程中的进展,应更多地强调纳入批判性思维的医学学生评估的更高领域。

相似文献

1
Medical students' assessment preferences at King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯费萨尔国王大学医学生的评估偏好
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2011 Mar 10;2:95-103. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S12950. Print 2011.
2
Experience with the objective structured examination as a tool for students' assessment in the Department of Community Medicine and Primary Health Care in a university [corrected] in Western Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯西部一所[更正后]大学的社区医学与初级卫生保健系将客观结构化考试作为学生评估工具的经验。
Saudi Med J. 2002 Feb;23(2):151-5.
3
Remote E-exams during Covid-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study of students' preferences and academic dishonesty in faculties of medical sciences.新冠疫情期间的远程电子考试:医学科学院学生偏好与学术不端行为的横断面研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Feb;62:326-333. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.054. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
4
Standard precautions and infection control, medical students' knowledge and behavior at a Saudi university: the need for change.沙特一所大学的标准预防措施与感染控制、医学生的知识和行为:变革的必要性。
Glob J Health Sci. 2013 Apr 21;5(4):114-25. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v5n4p114.
5
Does self-reflection and peer-assessment improve Saudi pharmacy students' academic performance and metacognitive skills?自我反思和同伴评估能否提高沙特药学专业学生的学业成绩和元认知技能?
Saudi Pharm J. 2015 Jul;23(3):266-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2014.11.018. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
6
Assessing the Objective Structured Clinical Examination: Saudi family medicine undergraduate medical students' perceptions of the tool.评估客观结构化临床考试:沙特家庭医学本科医学生对该工具的看法。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2013 Oct;63(10):1281-4.
7
Assessment methods of an undergraduate psychiatry course at a saudi university.沙特一所大学本科精神病学课程的评估方法
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2012 May;12(2):214-20. doi: 10.12816/0003115. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
8
Online viva voce as a formative assessment method in forensic medicine during COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间,在线口试作为法医学中的一种形成性评估方法
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Jun 11;11:160. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_446_21. eCollection 2022.
9
Specialty preferences of 1(st) year medical students in a Saudi Medical School - Factors affecting these choices and the influence of gender.沙特一所医学院校一年级医学生的专业偏好——影响这些选择的因素及性别影响
Avicenna J Med. 2015 Oct-Dec;5(4):134-9. doi: 10.4103/2231-0770.165120.
10
The validity and reliability of the sixth-year internal medical examination administered at the King Abdulaziz University Medical College.阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学医学院进行的六年级内科考试的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Feb 1;15:10. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0295-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Medical Student Portfolios: A Systematic Scoping Review.医学生档案袋:一项系统性综述
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2022 Mar 3;9:23821205221076022. doi: 10.1177/23821205221076022. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
2
How to assess? Perceptions and preferences of undergraduate medical students concerning traditional assessment methods.如何评估?本科医学生对传统评估方法的看法和偏好。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Sep 17;20(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02239-6.
3
Perceptions of clinical years' medical students and interns towards assessment methods used in King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah.吉达阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学临床阶段医学生和实习生对所采用评估方法的看法。
Pak J Med Sci. 2015 Jul-Aug;31(4):757-62. doi: 10.12669/pjms.314.7378.
4
Comparative assessment of students' performance and perceptions on objective structured practical models in undergraduate pathology teaching.本科病理学教学中客观结构化实践模式下学生表现与认知的比较评估
Singapore Med J. 2014 Sep;55(9):502-5. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2014121.

本文引用的文献

1
Applying global frameworks to assessment in medical education: an example of a nationally produced curriculum for cancer education.将全球框架应用于医学教育评估:以一份国家编制的癌症教育课程为例。
J Cancer Educ. 2010 Sep;25(3):285-9. doi: 10.1007/s13187-010-0096-8.
2
Assessment in medical education.医学教育中的评估。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 25;356(4):387-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra054784.
3
The effect of assessments and examinations on the learning of medical students.评估与考试对医学生学习的影响。
Med Educ. 1983 May;17(3):165-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1983.tb00657.x.
4
Modified essay questions: are they worth the effort?改良型论述题:它们值得付出努力吗?
Med Educ. 1986 Mar;20(2):126-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986.tb01059.x.
5
The cognitive context of examinations in psychiatry using Bloom's taxonomy.运用布鲁姆分类法对精神病学考试的认知情境分析
Med Educ. 1991 Nov;25(6):480-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1991.tb00101.x.