Suppr超能文献

如何评估?本科医学生对传统评估方法的看法和偏好。

How to assess? Perceptions and preferences of undergraduate medical students concerning traditional assessment methods.

机构信息

Research Unit for Curriculum Development, Teaching Center/Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, Bauteil 87, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.

University Clinic of Dentistry/Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2020 Sep 17;20(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02239-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical students' perception of traditional assessments have an important impact on their approaches to learning. Even though these assessment formats such as Multiple-Choice Question (MCQ), Short Answer Question (SAQ) or oral examinations, are frequently used in medical curricula, only little is known about student's perceptions of these assessments. The objective of this study was to assess perceptions and preferences of undergraduate medical students concerning traditional assessment formats.

METHODS

The study was conducted at the Medical University of Vienna. Attitudes of 2nd year undergraduate medical students towards traditional assessment formats, and their relation to students' learning, and students' attitude towards objectivity, was inquired using a self-developed questionnaire.

RESULTS

459 students participated in this study. MCQs examinations were the most preferred assessment format and were chosen as the most objective format. Most students agreed that oral examinations are more appropriate for achieving long-term knowledge. Female students showed higher preference for oral examinations than male students. Students would prefer an assessment mix of 41.8% MCQs, 24.0% oral examinations, and 9.5% SAQs, if they were free to choose the assessment tools.

CONCLUSION

Students prefer MCQ format over SAQs/oral examinations. Students' subjective perception of the importance of gaining long-term knowledge through an assessment has no influence on their assessment preference.

摘要

背景

医学生对传统评估的看法对他们的学习方法有重要影响。尽管多项选择题(MCQ)、简答题(SAQ)或口试等这些评估形式经常在医学课程中使用,但人们对学生对这些评估的看法知之甚少。本研究的目的是评估本科医学生对传统评估形式的看法和偏好。

方法

该研究在维也纳医科大学进行。使用自行设计的问卷,调查了二年级医学生对传统评估形式的态度,以及这些态度与学生的学习、学生对客观性的态度之间的关系。

结果

共有 459 名学生参加了这项研究。多项选择题考试是最受欢迎的评估形式,被选为最客观的形式。大多数学生认为口试更适合获得长期知识。与男生相比,女生对口试的偏好更高。如果学生可以自由选择评估工具,他们更希望评估组合为 41.8%的 MCQ、24.0%的口试和 9.5%的 SAQ。

结论

学生更喜欢 MCQ 格式而不是 SAQ/口试。学生对通过评估获得长期知识的重要性的主观看法不会影响他们的评估偏好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/320f/7499861/7437042d6812/12909_2020_2239_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Pick-N multiple choice-exams: a comparison of scoring algorithms.选择题组测验评分算法比较。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011 May;16(2):211-21. doi: 10.1007/s10459-010-9256-1. Epub 2010 Oct 31.
10
Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes.评估专业能力:从方法到方案。
Med Educ. 2005 Mar;39(3):309-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02094.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验