• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何评估?本科医学生对传统评估方法的看法和偏好。

How to assess? Perceptions and preferences of undergraduate medical students concerning traditional assessment methods.

机构信息

Research Unit for Curriculum Development, Teaching Center/Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, Bauteil 87, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.

University Clinic of Dentistry/Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2020 Sep 17;20(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02239-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-020-02239-6
PMID:32943049
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7499861/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical students' perception of traditional assessments have an important impact on their approaches to learning. Even though these assessment formats such as Multiple-Choice Question (MCQ), Short Answer Question (SAQ) or oral examinations, are frequently used in medical curricula, only little is known about student's perceptions of these assessments. The objective of this study was to assess perceptions and preferences of undergraduate medical students concerning traditional assessment formats.

METHODS

The study was conducted at the Medical University of Vienna. Attitudes of 2nd year undergraduate medical students towards traditional assessment formats, and their relation to students' learning, and students' attitude towards objectivity, was inquired using a self-developed questionnaire.

RESULTS

459 students participated in this study. MCQs examinations were the most preferred assessment format and were chosen as the most objective format. Most students agreed that oral examinations are more appropriate for achieving long-term knowledge. Female students showed higher preference for oral examinations than male students. Students would prefer an assessment mix of 41.8% MCQs, 24.0% oral examinations, and 9.5% SAQs, if they were free to choose the assessment tools.

CONCLUSION

Students prefer MCQ format over SAQs/oral examinations. Students' subjective perception of the importance of gaining long-term knowledge through an assessment has no influence on their assessment preference.

摘要

背景

医学生对传统评估的看法对他们的学习方法有重要影响。尽管多项选择题(MCQ)、简答题(SAQ)或口试等这些评估形式经常在医学课程中使用,但人们对学生对这些评估的看法知之甚少。本研究的目的是评估本科医学生对传统评估形式的看法和偏好。

方法

该研究在维也纳医科大学进行。使用自行设计的问卷,调查了二年级医学生对传统评估形式的态度,以及这些态度与学生的学习、学生对客观性的态度之间的关系。

结果

共有 459 名学生参加了这项研究。多项选择题考试是最受欢迎的评估形式,被选为最客观的形式。大多数学生认为口试更适合获得长期知识。与男生相比,女生对口试的偏好更高。如果学生可以自由选择评估工具,他们更希望评估组合为 41.8%的 MCQ、24.0%的口试和 9.5%的 SAQ。

结论

学生更喜欢 MCQ 格式而不是 SAQ/口试。学生对通过评估获得长期知识的重要性的主观看法不会影响他们的评估偏好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/320f/7499861/1f0b927864f8/12909_2020_2239_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/320f/7499861/7437042d6812/12909_2020_2239_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/320f/7499861/9a20baf75410/12909_2020_2239_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/320f/7499861/a2df51b3d6f7/12909_2020_2239_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/320f/7499861/9ad105696a4c/12909_2020_2239_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/320f/7499861/1f0b927864f8/12909_2020_2239_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/320f/7499861/7437042d6812/12909_2020_2239_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/320f/7499861/9a20baf75410/12909_2020_2239_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/320f/7499861/a2df51b3d6f7/12909_2020_2239_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/320f/7499861/9ad105696a4c/12909_2020_2239_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/320f/7499861/1f0b927864f8/12909_2020_2239_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
How to assess? Perceptions and preferences of undergraduate medical students concerning traditional assessment methods.如何评估?本科医学生对传统评估方法的看法和偏好。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Sep 17;20(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02239-6.
2
Pursue today and assess tomorrow - how students' subjective perceptions influence their preference for self- and peer assessments.今日追求,明日评估——学生的主观认知如何影响他们对自我评估和同伴评估的偏好。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Nov 27;20(1):479. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02383-z.
3
Undergraduate medical student's perceptions on traditional and problem based curricula: pilot study.本科医学生对传统课程和基于问题的课程的看法:试点研究。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2014 Jul;64(7):775-9.
4
Choosing medical assessments: Does the multiple-choice question make the grade?选择医学评估:多项选择题能达标吗?
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2018 May-Aug;31(2):65-71. doi: 10.4103/efh.EfH_229_17.
5
An experimental comparison of multiple-choice and short-answer questions on a high-stakes test for medical students.对医学生高风险测试中的多项选择题和简答题进行的实验比较。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 Jul;29(3):783-801. doi: 10.1007/s10459-023-10266-3. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
6
Integrated problem-based learning versus lectures: a path analysis modelling of the relationships between educational context and learning approaches.综合问题导向学习与讲座:教育背景与学习方法关系的路径分析模型。
Med Educ Online. 2018 Dec;23(1):1489690. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2018.1489690.
7
Creating assessments as an active learning strategy: what are students' perceptions? A mixed methods study.创建评估作为一种主动学习策略:学生的看法是什么?一项混合方法研究。
Med Educ Online. 2019 Dec;24(1):1630239. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1630239.
8
The relationship of online pre-recorded neurology mini-lectures to medical student assessment: a pilot study.在线预录神经病学微课与医学生评估的关系:一项试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Apr 7;23(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04185-5.
9
An assessment of the feasibility and effectiveness of an e-learning module in delivering a curriculum in radiation protection to undergraduate medical students.评估电子学习模块在向医科大学生传授放射防护课程方面的可行性和有效性。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2012 Mar;9(3):203-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.09.014.
10
Patients don't come with multiple choice options: essay-based assessment in UME.医学生学业评估中的论述题考试:患者没有多项选择。
Med Educ Online. 2019 Dec;24(1):1649959. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1649959.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating AI-generated examination papers in periodontology: a comparative study with human-designed counterparts.评估人工智能生成的牙周病学考试试卷:与人工设计试卷的对比研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 23;25(1):1099. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07706-6.
2
Perceptions of the first graduates of the reformed medical curriculum of the College of Medicine at Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University.对伊玛目阿卜杜勒拉赫曼·本·费萨尔大学医学院改革后的医学课程首批毕业生的看法。
J Family Community Med. 2025 Apr-Jun;32(2):157-163. doi: 10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_332_24. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
3
Efficacy of Faculty Development Training Workshops (FDTWs) on Writing High-Quality Multiple-Choice Questions at Northern Border University (NBU) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).

本文引用的文献

1
Validity of very short answer versus single best answer questions for undergraduate assessment.本科评估中极简短回答题与单项最佳答案题的效度。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Oct 13;16(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0793-z.
2
Perceptions of clinical years' medical students and interns towards assessment methods used in King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah.吉达阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学临床阶段医学生和实习生对所采用评估方法的看法。
Pak J Med Sci. 2015 Jul-Aug;31(4):757-62. doi: 10.12669/pjms.314.7378.
3
Students' feedback on teaching and assessment at Nishtar Medical College, Multan.
沙特阿拉伯王国(KSA)北部边境大学(NBU)教师发展培训工作坊(FDTWs)在编写高质量多项选择题方面的成效。
Cureus. 2024 Jun 18;16(6):e62607. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62607. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
A narrative review of adaptive testing and its application to medical education.适应性测试及其在医学教育中的应用的叙述性综述。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2023 Oct 24;13:221. doi: 10.12688/mep.19844.1. eCollection 2023.
5
Assessment Practices of Learning Outcomes of Postgraduate Students in Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences at College of Health Sciences at Addis Ababa University: Student and Faculty Perspectives.亚的斯亚贝巴大学健康科学学院生物医学与制药科学专业研究生学习成果评估实践:学生与教师视角
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023 Jul 3;14:693-706. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S412755. eCollection 2023.
6
Diagnostic branched tree as an assessment and feedback tool in undergraduate pharmacology education.诊断二叉树作为本科药理学教育的评估和反馈工具。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 May 24;23(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04342-w.
木尔坦尼什塔尔医学院学生对教学与评估的反馈
J Pak Med Assoc. 2013 Sep;63(9):1205-9.
4
The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications.专业能力评估:发展、研究与实际影响。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 1996 Jan;1(1):41-67. doi: 10.1007/BF00596229.
5
Medical students' assessment preferences at King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯费萨尔国王大学医学生的评估偏好
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2011 Mar 10;2:95-103. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S12950. Print 2011.
6
How to write short cases for assessing problem-solving skills.如何撰写用于评估解决问题能力的简短案例。
Med Teach. 1999;21(2):144-50. doi: 10.1080/01421599979761.
7
Pick-N multiple choice-exams: a comparison of scoring algorithms.选择题组测验评分算法比较。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011 May;16(2):211-21. doi: 10.1007/s10459-010-9256-1. Epub 2010 Oct 31.
8
Assessment drives learning: an unavoidable truth?评估推动学习:一个不可避免的事实?
Anat Sci Educ. 2009 Oct;2(5):199-204. doi: 10.1002/ase.102.
9
Survey of teaching/learning of healthcare-associated infections in UK and Irish medical schools.英国和爱尔兰医学院校医疗相关感染教学情况调查。
J Hosp Infect. 2009 Oct;73(2):171-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 25.
10
Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes.评估专业能力:从方法到方案。
Med Educ. 2005 Mar;39(3):309-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02094.x.