Segovia Kristen N, Vontell Regina, López-Cruz Laura, Salamone John D, Correa Mercè
Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut Storrs, CT, USA.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2013 May 24;7:48. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00048. eCollection 2013.
Considerable evidence indicates that the metabolite of ethanol (EtOH), acetaldehyde, is biologically active. Acetaldehyde can be formed from EtOH peripherally mainly by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), and also centrally by catalase. EtOH and acetaldehyde show differences in their behavioral effects depending upon the route of administration. In terms of their effects on motor activity and motivated behaviors, when administered peripherally acetaldehyde tends to be more potent than EtOH but shows very similar potency administered centrally. Since dopamine (DA) rich areas have an important role in regulating both motor activity and motivation, the present studies were undertaken to compare the effects of central (intraventricular, ICV) and peripheral (intraperitoneal, IP) administration of EtOH and acetaldehyde on a cellular marker of brain activity, c-Fos immunoreactivity, in DA innervated areas. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received an IP injection of vehicle, EtOH (0.5 or 2.5 g/kg) or acetaldehyde (0.1 or 0.5 g/kg) or an ICV injection of vehicle, EtOH or acetaldehyde (2.8 or 14.0 μmoles). IP administration of EtOH minimally induced c-Fos in some regions of the prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia, mainly at the low dose (0.5 g/kg), while IP acetaldehyde induced c-Fos in virtually all the structures studied at both doses. Acetaldehyde administered centrally increased c-Fos in all areas studied, a pattern that was very similar to EtOH. Thus, IP administered acetaldehyde was more efficacious than EtOH at inducing c-Fos expression. However, the general pattern of c-Fos induction promoted by ICV EtOH and acetaldehyde was similar. These results are consistent with the pattern observed in behavioral studies in which both substances produced the same magnitude of effect when injected centrally, and produced differences in potency after peripheral administration.
大量证据表明,乙醇(EtOH)的代谢产物乙醛具有生物活性。乙醛主要在外周由乙醇脱氢酶(ADH)从EtOH生成,也可在中枢由过氧化氢酶生成。EtOH和乙醛的行为效应因给药途径而异。就其对运动活动和动机行为的影响而言,外周给药时乙醛往往比EtOH更有效,但中枢给药时二者效力非常相似。由于富含多巴胺(DA)的区域在调节运动活动和动机方面具有重要作用,因此开展了本研究,以比较EtOH和乙醛中枢(脑室内,ICV)和外周(腹腔内,IP)给药对DA支配区域脑活动细胞标志物c-Fos免疫反应性的影响。雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠接受腹腔注射溶剂、EtOH(0.5或2.5 g/kg)或乙醛(0.1或0.5 g/kg),或脑室内注射溶剂、EtOH或乙醛(2.8或14.0微摩尔)。腹腔注射EtOH仅在低剂量(0.5 g/kg)时在前额叶皮质和基底神经节的某些区域轻微诱导c-Fos,而腹腔注射乙醛在两个剂量下几乎在所研究的所有结构中均诱导c-Fos。中枢给予乙醛使所有研究区域的c-Fos增加,这一模式与EtOH非常相似。因此,腹腔注射乙醛在诱导c-Fos表达方面比EtOH更有效。然而,脑室内给予EtOH和乙醛所促进的c-Fos诱导总体模式相似。这些结果与行为研究中观察到的模式一致,即在中枢注射时两种物质产生相同程度的效应,而外周给药后效力存在差异。