• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)对有症状输尿管结石短期疗效的前瞻性随机评估

Prospective randomized evaluation of emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) on the short-time outcome of symptomatic ureteral stones.

作者信息

Tombal Bertrand, Mawlawi Hadi, Feyaerts Axel, Wese Francois X, Opsomer Reinier, Van Cangh Paul J

机构信息

Service d'Urologie, UCL Saint Luc, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2005 Jun;47(6):855-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.006. Epub 2005 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.006
PMID:15925083
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Here, we report the results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing the efficacy of emergency ESWL (eESWL) on the short-term outcome of symptomatic ureteral stones.

MATERIAL

The trial enrolled 100 patients admitted in emergency room for renal colic caused by a ureteral radioopaque [corrected] stone. Patients were randomized to medical therapy alone or combined with eESWL. eESWL was performed within 6 hours of the onset of renal colic without specific analgesia on a Lithostar lithotripter (Siemens Medical, Munich, Germany). The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients stone free rate after 48 hours (SF-48) and the cumulative proportion of patients discharged from the hospital after 48 and 72 hours.

RESULTS

Ureteral stone's location was proximal and distal in respectively 46% and 54% of the patients; stone's mean size was 5.5 mm (range 2-10 mm). Median hospital stay was 3 days, ranging from 1 to 14 days. SF-48 in the control group varied from 76% for distal stones <5 mm to 28.6% for proximal stones >5 mm, averaging at 61%. On average, eESWL increased SF-48 by 13% (p: 0.126), the gain strictly depending on stone size and location. SF-48 increase ranged from 40% for proximal stones >5 mm to 1.8% for distal stone <5 mm. On average, eESWL increased the median duration of hospital stay by one day. This mean negative impact results from ESWL increasing significantly the duration of hospital stay in case of distal stone, while slightly shortened it for stones located proximally.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated for the first time that rapidly performed ESWL is a valuable therapeutic option to improve elimination of ureteral stones and shorten duration of hospital stay, proven that the stone is located proximally to the iliac vessels.

摘要

目的

在此,我们报告一项随机对照试验(RCT)的结果,该试验评估了急诊体外冲击波碎石术(eESWL)对有症状输尿管结石短期预后的疗效。

材料

该试验纳入了100名因输尿管不透X线结石导致肾绞痛而入住急诊室的患者。患者被随机分为单纯药物治疗组或联合eESWL治疗组。在肾绞痛发作后6小时内,在未进行特殊镇痛的情况下,使用Lithostar碎石机(德国西门子医疗公司,慕尼黑)进行eESWL。主要终点是48小时后结石清除率(SF - 48)的患者比例以及48小时和72小时后出院患者的累积比例。

结果

输尿管结石位于近端和远端的患者分别占46%和54%;结石平均大小为5.5毫米(范围2 - 10毫米)。中位住院时间为3天,范围为1至14天。对照组的SF - 48在远端<5毫米结石患者中为76%,在近端>5毫米结石患者中为28.6%,平均为61%。平均而言,eESWL使SF - 48提高了13%(p:0.126),获益程度严格取决于结石大小和位置。SF - 48的增加范围从近端>5毫米结石的40%到远端<5毫米结石的1.8%。平均而言,eESWL使中位住院时间增加了一天。这种平均负面影响是由于ESWL在远端结石情况下显著增加了住院时间,而在近端结石时则使其略有缩短。

结论

本研究首次证明,对于位于髂血管近端的结石,快速进行的ESWL是改善输尿管结石排出和缩短住院时间的一种有价值的治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Prospective randomized evaluation of emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) on the short-time outcome of symptomatic ureteral stones.急诊体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)对有症状输尿管结石短期疗效的前瞻性随机评估
Eur Urol. 2005 Jun;47(6):855-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.006. Epub 2005 Mar 17.
2
Rapid extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for proximal ureteral calculi in colic versus noncolic patients.急性与非急性患者近端输尿管结石的快速体外冲击波碎石术
Eur Urol. 2007 Oct;52(4):1223-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.02.001. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
3
[Shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones--single institute experience in 661 consecutive cases].[冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石——单机构661例连续病例经验]
Harefuah. 2005 Sep;144(9):605-8, 680, 679.
4
Ureteral stone location at emergency room presentation with colic.输尿管结石在急诊科表现为绞痛时的位置。
J Urol. 2009 Jul;182(1):165-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.131. Epub 2009 May 17.
5
Treatment of calculi in the upper ureter with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.体外冲击波碎石术治疗上段输尿管结石
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1987 Jan;164(1):1-8.
6
Rapid extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment after a first colic episode correlates with accelerated ureteral stone clearance.首次肾绞痛发作后立即进行体外冲击波碎石术治疗与输尿管结石清除加速相关。
Eur Urol. 2006 Jun;49(6):1099-105; discussion 1105-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.003. Epub 2005 Dec 28.
7
Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.治疗近端输尿管结石的效率与成本:冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查联合钬:钇铝石榴石激光治疗的比较
Urology. 2004 Dec;64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.07.040.
8
A randomized outcomes trial of ureteral stents for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of solitary kidney or proximal ureteral stones.输尿管支架用于孤立肾或近端输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石术的随机结果试验。
J Urol. 2002 May;167(5):1981-3.
9
Evaluation of a synchronous twin-pulse technique for shock wave lithotripsy: the first prospective clinical study.冲击波碎石术同步双脉冲技术的评估:首例前瞻性临床研究。
BJU Int. 2005 Feb;95(3):389-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05306.x.
10
Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of middle ureteral stones: are ureteral stents necessary?输尿管中段结石的体外冲击波碎石术:是否需要放置输尿管支架?
Urology. 1995 Nov;46(5):649-52. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80294-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Follow-Up Survey for Conservatively Managed Ureteric Stones.输尿管结石保守治疗的随访调查
Cureus. 2024 Aug 14;16(8):e66845. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66845. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Success rate and complications of performing elective ureteroscopy in <1 week versus over 1 week from renal colic initiation in ureteral stones larger than 6 mm.对于直径大于6mm的输尿管结石,在肾绞痛发作后1周内与超过1周后进行择期输尿管镜检查的成功率及并发症情况。
J Res Med Sci. 2024 Jul 11;29:27. doi: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_43_23. eCollection 2024.
3
The efficacy of early extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for the treatment of 5 to 10 mm upper ureteral stones: An observational study.
早期体外冲击波碎石术治疗 5 至 10 毫米上段输尿管结石的疗效:一项观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jul 26;103(30):e39103. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039103.
4
Ureteroscopy Versus Double J Stenting in Emergency Treatment of Obstructive Lithiasis.输尿管镜检查与双J管置入术在梗阻性结石急诊治疗中的比较
Maedica (Bucur). 2023 Dec;18(4):586-592. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2023.18.4.586.
5
Efficacy of emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones: a meta-analysis.急诊体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效:Meta 分析。
BMC Urol. 2023 Apr 4;23(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01226-5.
6
Development and validation of a predictive model for treatment outcome after emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with symptomatic ureteral stones during the COVID-19 pandemic: in a large prospective cohort.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对有症状的输尿管结石患者行急诊体外冲击波碎石术治疗结局的预测模型的开发和验证:一项大型前瞻性队列研究。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Dec 31;51(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01401-7.
7
Primary Definitive Treatment versus Ureteric Stenting in the Management of Acute Ureteric Colic: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.急性输尿管绞痛治疗中初始确定性治疗与输尿管支架置入术的成本效益分析
J Pers Med. 2022 Oct 27;12(11):1773. doi: 10.3390/jpm12111773.
8
Predictors of successful emergency shock wave lithotripsy for acute renal colic.预测急性肾绞痛急诊冲击波碎石术成功的因素。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Aug;50(4):481-485. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01332-3. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
9
Role of clinical and radiological parameters in predicting the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones.临床和放射学参数在预测输尿管结石冲击波碎石术结果中的作用。
Urol Ann. 2018 Apr-Jun;10(2):159-164. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_84_17.
10
Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones: a cumulative analysis of comparative studies.急诊与延迟碎石术治疗输尿管梗阻结石:荟萃分析比较研究。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Dec;45(6):563-572. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0960-7. Epub 2017 Feb 23.