Division of Evidence-Based Medicine, Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Charité--Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany,
Arch Dermatol Res. 2013 Dec;305(10):899-907. doi: 10.1007/s00403-013-1372-3. Epub 2013 Jun 8.
Despite the availability of a plethora of approved systemic treatments, high proportions of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis do not receive systemic treatment. This study aims at identifying barriers that hinder dermatologists from prescribing systemic treatments for psoriasis. A cross-sectional online survey in six countries (Canada, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, UK) was performed among 300 dermatologists, assessing the relevance of 15 potential barriers towards prescribing acitretin, cyclosporine, methotrexate, adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab and ustekinumab. Multivariate regression analyses were used to explore provider characteristics related to these barriers. Treatment barriers are perceived differently in the countries investigated, with Spanish, Italian and Canadian dermatologists being particularly concerned about the safety of methotrexate and Canadian dermatologists about the safety of cyclosporine. In general, safety concerns were the most important barrier to the use of cyclosporine, (18 % of participants' moderate/9 % strong or very strong barrier). Costs were being perceived as a strong or very strong barrier to the use of the different biologics by 19-24 % of the participants. Overall, country and work place were the most important determinants of treatment barriers. Sex, age, training, position and experience were minor determinants of treatment barriers. Medical reasons such as safety concerns or an inappropriate risk-benefit profile are particularly relevant barriers to the prescription of conventional treatments; whereas for biological treatments, economic reasons such as costs are more prevalent. Country specific analysis showed national differences in the perception of safety. The treatment barriers identified in this exploratory study should be confirmed in further health services research.
尽管有大量已批准的系统治疗方法,但仍有相当比例的中重度银屑病患者未接受系统治疗。本研究旨在确定阻碍皮肤科医生为银屑病患者开具系统治疗药物的障碍。在六个国家(加拿大、德国、西班牙、法国、意大利和英国)进行了一项横断面在线调查,调查了 300 名皮肤科医生,评估了 15 种潜在障碍对开处方阿维 A、环孢素、甲氨蝶呤、阿达木单抗、依那西普、英夫利昔单抗和乌司奴单抗的相关性。采用多变量回归分析探讨与这些障碍相关的提供者特征。在调查的国家中,治疗障碍的看法存在差异,西班牙、意大利和加拿大的皮肤科医生特别关注甲氨蝶呤的安全性,而加拿大的皮肤科医生则关注环孢素的安全性。总的来说,安全问题是使用环孢素的最重要障碍(18%的参与者认为其为中度/9%的参与者认为其为强或很强障碍)。19-24%的参与者认为不同生物制剂的费用是使用这些药物的强或很强障碍。总体而言,国家和工作场所是治疗障碍的最重要决定因素。性别、年龄、培训、职位和经验是治疗障碍的次要决定因素。安全性等医学原因或不适当的风险-获益特征是开具传统治疗药物的特别相关障碍;而对于生物治疗药物,成本等经济原因更为普遍。国家特定分析显示,安全性认知存在国家差异。本探索性研究中确定的治疗障碍应在进一步的卫生服务研究中得到证实。