The John D. Dingell Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
J Bacteriol. 2013 Aug;195(16):3651-62. doi: 10.1128/JB.00565-13. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
The expression of mepA, encoding the Staphylococcus aureus MepA multidrug efflux protein, is repressed by the MarR homologue MepR. MepR dimers bind differently to operators upstream of mepR and mepA, with affinity being greatest at the mepA operator. MepR substitution mutations may result in mepA overexpression, with A103V most common in clinical strains. Evaluation of the functional consequences of this and other MepR substitutions using a lacZ reporter gene assay revealed markedly reduced repressor activity in the presence of Q18P, F27L, G97E, and A103V substitutions. Reporter data were generally supported by susceptibility and efflux assays, and electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) confirmed compromised affinities of MepR F27L and A103V for the mepR and mepA operators. One mutant protein contained two substitutions (T94P and T132M); T132M compensated for the functional defect incurred by T94P and also rescued that of A103V but not F27L, establishing it as a limited-range suppressor. The function of another derivative with 10 substitutions was minimally affected, and this may be an extreme example of suppression involving interactions among several residues. Structural correlations for the observed functional effects were ascertained by modeling mutations onto apo-MepR. It is likely that F27L and A103V affect the protein-DNA interaction by repositioning of DNA recognition helices. Negative functional consequences of MepR substitution mutations may result from interference with structural plasticity, alteration of helical arrangements, reduced protein-cognate DNA affinity, or possibly association of MepR protomers. Structural determinations will provide further insight into the consequences of these and other mutations that affect MepR function, especially the T132M suppressor.
金黄色葡萄球菌 MepA 多药外排蛋白的编码基因 mepA 的表达受 MarR 同源物 MepR 抑制。MepR 二聚体以不同的亲和力结合在 mepR 和 mepA 的上游操纵子上,在 mepA 操纵子上的亲和力最大。MepR 取代突变可能导致 mepA 过表达,临床菌株中最常见的是 A103V。使用 lacZ 报告基因检测评估这种和其他 MepR 取代的功能后果表明,在存在 Q18P、F27L、G97E 和 A103V 取代的情况下,抑制子活性明显降低。报告基因数据通常得到药敏试验和外排试验的支持,电泳迁移率变动分析(EMSA)证实 MepR F27L 和 A103V 与 mepR 和 mepA 操纵子的亲和力降低。一种突变蛋白含有两个取代(T94P 和 T132M);T132M 补偿了 T94P 引起的功能缺陷,也挽救了 A103V 但不是 F27L 的功能,使其成为一个有限范围的抑制子。另一个含有 10 个取代的衍生蛋白的功能受影响最小,这可能是涉及几个残基相互作用的抑制的极端例子。通过将突变建模到 apo-MepR 上,确定了观察到的功能影响的结构相关性。F27L 和 A103V 可能通过重新定位 DNA 识别螺旋来影响蛋白-DNA 相互作用。MepR 取代突变的负功能后果可能是由于对结构可塑性的干扰、螺旋排列的改变、与 MepR 同型二聚体的结合。结构测定将进一步深入了解这些和其他影响 MepR 功能的突变的后果,特别是 T132M 抑制子。