Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 6;4:160. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00160. eCollection 2013.
Using a naturalistic video database, we examined whether gestures scaffold the symbolic development of a language-enculturated chimpanzee, a language-enculturated bonobo, and a human child during the second year of life. These three species constitute a complete clade: species possessing a common immediate ancestor. A basic finding was the functional and formal similarity of many gestures between chimpanzee, bonobo, and human child. The child's symbols were spoken words; the apes' symbols were lexigrams - non-iconic visual signifiers. A developmental pattern in which gestural representation of a referent preceded symbolic representation of the same referent appeared in all three species (but was statistically significant only for the child). Nonetheless, across species, the ratio of symbol to gesture increased significantly with age. But even though their symbol production increased, the apes continued to communicate more frequently by gesture than by symbol. In contrast, by 15-18 months of age, the child used symbols more frequently than gestures. This ontogenetic sequence from gesture to symbol, present across the clade but more pronounced in child than ape, provides support for the role of gesture in language evolution. In all three species, the overwhelming majority of gestures were communicative (i.e., paired with eye contact, vocalization, and/or persistence). However, vocalization was rare for the apes, but accompanied the majority of the child's communicative gestures. This species difference suggests the co-evolution of speech and gesture after the evolutionary divergence of the hominid line. Multimodal expressions of communicative intent (e.g., vocalization plus persistence) were normative for the child, but less common for the apes. This species difference suggests that multimodal expression of communicative intent was also strengthened after hominids diverged from apes.
使用自然主义视频数据库,我们研究了手势是否可以为语言文化的黑猩猩、语言文化的倭黑猩猩和人类婴儿在生命的第二年提供语言符号的发展支持。这三个物种构成了一个完整的分支:拥有共同最近祖先的物种。一个基本的发现是,黑猩猩、倭黑猩猩和人类婴儿之间的许多手势在功能和形式上具有相似性。儿童的符号是口语单词;猿类的符号是 lexigrams——非图像符号。手势代表所指物的代表先于相同所指物的符号代表的发展模式出现在所有三个物种中(但仅对儿童具有统计学意义)。尽管如此,跨物种,符号与手势的比例随着年龄的增长而显著增加。但是,即使它们的符号生成增加了,猿类仍然比符号更频繁地通过手势进行交流。相比之下,在 15-18 个月大时,儿童使用符号比手势更频繁。这种从手势到符号的个体发生序列在整个分支中都存在,但在儿童中比在猿类中更为明显,为手势在语言进化中的作用提供了支持。在所有三个物种中,绝大多数手势都是交际性的(即与眼神接触、发声和/或持续时间配对)。然而,猿类很少发声,但伴随着大多数儿童的交际手势。这种物种差异表明,在人类谱系的进化分歧之后,言语和手势共同进化。交流意图的多模态表达(例如发声加持续时间)对儿童来说是规范的,但对猿类来说则不常见。这种物种差异表明,在人类与猿类分化后,交流意图的多模态表达也得到了加强。