Giesbertz Noor A A, Bredenoord Annelien L, van Delden Johannes J M
Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Feb;22(2):266-9. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.119. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
Assent is a relatively young term in research ethics, but became an often mentioned ethical requirement in current pediatric research guidelines. Also, the European Society of Human Genetics considers assent an important condition for the inclusion of children in biobanks. However, although many emphasize the importance of assent, few explain how they understand the concept and few have elaborated on the underlying grounds. In this paper, we will discuss the different underlying ethical principles of assent. In the first category, assent appears to be derived from informed consent. This understanding is grounded in respect for autonomy and protection against harm. We conclude that this interpretation of assent is not of added value as a majority of children cannot be considered competent to make autonomous decisions. In addition, other safeguards are more appropriate to protect children against harm. The grounds from the second category can be classified as engagement grounds. These grounds do justice to the specifics of childhood and are of added value. Furthermore, we argue that it follows that both the content and the process of assent should be adjusted to the individual child. This can be referred to as personalized assent. Personalized assent is an appeal to the moral responsibility and integrity of the researcher.
在研究伦理中,赞同是一个相对较新的术语,但在当前的儿科研究指南中已成为经常提及的伦理要求。此外,欧洲人类遗传学学会认为赞同是儿童纳入生物样本库的一项重要条件。然而,尽管许多人强调赞同的重要性,但很少有人解释他们如何理解这一概念,也很少有人阐述其背后的依据。在本文中,我们将讨论赞同背后不同的伦理原则。在第一类中,赞同似乎源自知情同意。这种理解基于对自主性的尊重和免受伤害的保护。我们得出结论,这种对赞同的解释并没有额外的价值,因为大多数儿童不能被认为有能力做出自主决定。此外,其他保障措施更适合保护儿童免受伤害。第二类依据可归类为参与依据。这些依据考虑到了童年的特殊性,具有额外的价值。此外,我们认为赞同的内容和过程都应根据每个孩子的情况进行调整。这可称为个性化赞同。个性化赞同呼吁研究人员承担道德责任并保持正直。