Suppr超能文献

明确儿科研究中的同意程序。

Clarifying assent in pediatric research.

作者信息

Giesbertz Noor A A, Bredenoord Annelien L, van Delden Johannes J M

机构信息

Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Feb;22(2):266-9. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.119. Epub 2013 Jun 12.

Abstract

Assent is a relatively young term in research ethics, but became an often mentioned ethical requirement in current pediatric research guidelines. Also, the European Society of Human Genetics considers assent an important condition for the inclusion of children in biobanks. However, although many emphasize the importance of assent, few explain how they understand the concept and few have elaborated on the underlying grounds. In this paper, we will discuss the different underlying ethical principles of assent. In the first category, assent appears to be derived from informed consent. This understanding is grounded in respect for autonomy and protection against harm. We conclude that this interpretation of assent is not of added value as a majority of children cannot be considered competent to make autonomous decisions. In addition, other safeguards are more appropriate to protect children against harm. The grounds from the second category can be classified as engagement grounds. These grounds do justice to the specifics of childhood and are of added value. Furthermore, we argue that it follows that both the content and the process of assent should be adjusted to the individual child. This can be referred to as personalized assent. Personalized assent is an appeal to the moral responsibility and integrity of the researcher.

摘要

在研究伦理中,赞同是一个相对较新的术语,但在当前的儿科研究指南中已成为经常提及的伦理要求。此外,欧洲人类遗传学学会认为赞同是儿童纳入生物样本库的一项重要条件。然而,尽管许多人强调赞同的重要性,但很少有人解释他们如何理解这一概念,也很少有人阐述其背后的依据。在本文中,我们将讨论赞同背后不同的伦理原则。在第一类中,赞同似乎源自知情同意。这种理解基于对自主性的尊重和免受伤害的保护。我们得出结论,这种对赞同的解释并没有额外的价值,因为大多数儿童不能被认为有能力做出自主决定。此外,其他保障措施更适合保护儿童免受伤害。第二类依据可归类为参与依据。这些依据考虑到了童年的特殊性,具有额外的价值。此外,我们认为赞同的内容和过程都应根据每个孩子的情况进行调整。这可称为个性化赞同。个性化赞同呼吁研究人员承担道德责任并保持正直。

相似文献

1
Clarifying assent in pediatric research.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Feb;22(2):266-9. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.119. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
2
Personalized assent for pediatric biobanks.
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Oct 12;17(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0142-0.
3
Consent and assent in paediatric research in low-income settings.
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Mar 5;15:22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-22.
4
Assent in paediatric research: theoretical and practical considerations.
J Med Ethics. 2006 Apr;32(4):229-34. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.011114.
5
Developing a new justification for assent.
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Jan 12;17:2. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0085-x.
6
Children are not small adults: documentation of assent for research involving children.
J Pediatr. 2006 Jul;149(1 Suppl):S31-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.04.048.
8
Assent for children's participation in research: why it matters and making it meaningful.
Child Care Health Dev. 2016 Jul;42(4):588-97. doi: 10.1111/cch.12344. Epub 2016 May 2.
9
Engaging children in genomics research: decoding the meaning of assent in research.
Genet Med. 2012 Apr;14(4):437-43. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.9. Epub 2012 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Reimagining Assent: When Things Get Lost in Translation in International Pediatric Research.
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2025 Feb 28;17(2):307-324. doi: 10.1007/s41649-024-00342-0. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
HIV interventions across the care continuum for adolescents in high-burden countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Nov 28;78:102989. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102989. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Pushing past distractions to move toward assent-based practice and science: a response to Newcomb and Wine.
Int J Dev Disabil. 2023 May 5;69(4):630-632. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2023.2206722. eCollection 2023.
6
Paediatric biobanking for health: The ethical, legal, and societal landscape.
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 27;10:917615. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.917615. eCollection 2022.
7
Sharing and Safeguarding Pediatric Data.
Front Genet. 2022 Jun 20;13:872586. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.872586. eCollection 2022.
9
Children's Understanding of Informed Assents in Research Studies.
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jul 10;9(7):871. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9070871.
10
Assent and consent in adolescent research: teachers' perspectives from a developing country.
Heliyon. 2020 Jan 2;6(1):e03116. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03116. eCollection 2020 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Pediatric biobanking: a pilot qualitative survey of practices, rules, and researcher opinions in ten European countries.
Biopreserv Biobank. 2012 Feb;10(1):29-36. doi: 10.1089/bio.2011.0037. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
3
Do Illustrations Improve Children's Comprehension of Assent Documents?
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Jul;17(3):228-35. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-17.3.228.
4
Inclusion of residual tissue in biobanks: opt-in or opt-out?
PLoS Biol. 2012;10(8):e1001373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001373. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
5
Developing a policy for paediatric biobanks: principles for good practice.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2013 Jan;21(1):2-7. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.99. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
7
Engaging children in genomics research: decoding the meaning of assent in research.
Genet Med. 2012 Apr;14(4):437-43. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.9. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
8
Assent is not consent.
J Med Ethics. 2012 Jan;38(1):3. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100317.
9
Pediatric research and the return of individual research results.
J Law Med Ethics. 2011 Winter;39(4):593-604. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00626.x.
10
Dissent about assent in paediatric research.
J Med Ethics. 2012 Jan;38(1):2. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100242. Epub 2011 Nov 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验