Parklands Medical Centre, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Diabetes Ther. 2013 Jun;4(1):153-66. doi: 10.1007/s13300-013-0026-y. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
This sub-analysis evaluated clinical safety and effectiveness of bolus insulin aspart [with/without oral glucose-lowering drugs (OGLDs)] as the only insulin therapy.
A1chieve was an international, multicenter, prospective, open-label, non-interventional, observational, 24-week study in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus starting/switching to biphasic insulin aspart 30, insulin detemir or insulin aspart treatment (alone/in combination) in routine clinical practice. This sub-analysis evaluated clinical safety and effectiveness of bolus insulin aspart (±OGLDs) as the only insulin therapy. Data were analyzed for all patients, insulin-experienced and insulin-naive sub-groups, and sub-groups defined by the number of OGLDs prescribed at baseline (no OGLDs, one OGLD or ≥two OGLDs). Safety and effectiveness endpoints were assessed at baseline and following 24 weeks' therapy.
In total, 2,026 patients were included (insulin-experienced, n = 561; insulin-naive, n = 1,465) in this sub-analysis. Significant improvements from baseline after 24 weeks' treatment with insulin aspart ± OGLDs were observed across all sub-groups for: glycated hemoglobin (range of means across sub-groups -1.6 to -2.4%; p < 0.001 for all comparisons), fasting plasma glucose (-2.5 to -3.8 mmol/l; p < 0.001 for all comparisons), post-breakfast post-prandial glucose (-3.4 to -5.8 mmol/l; p < 0.001 for all comparisons), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The proportion of patients reporting hypoglycemia events was significantly reduced from baseline after 24 weeks (insulin-naive cohort: 7.9-2.8%; p < 0.001; insulin-experienced cohort: 23.2-7.8%; p < 0.001). There were no reports of major hypoglycemia events at 24 weeks; risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia was <0.6 events/person-year. No serious adverse drug reactions were reported.
Insulin aspart ± OGLDs is associated with significant improvements in glycemic control and HRQoL, without increased risk of hypoglycemia, in people with type 2 diabetes and sub-optimal glucose control.
本亚分析评估了作为唯一胰岛素治疗方案时,门冬胰岛素(联合/不联合口服降糖药[OGLD])的临床安全性和有效性。
A1chieve 是一项国际性、多中心、前瞻性、开放标签、非干预性、观察性、24 周研究,纳入了在常规临床实践中起始/转换使用双相门冬胰岛素 30、地特胰岛素或门冬胰岛素治疗(单药/联合治疗)的 2 型糖尿病患者。本亚分析评估了作为唯一胰岛素治疗方案时,门冬胰岛素(联合/不联合 OGLD)的临床安全性和有效性。对所有患者、有胰岛素治疗经验和无胰岛素治疗经验的亚组以及根据基线时 OGLD 处方数量(无 OGLD、一种 OGLD 或≥两种 OGLD)定义的亚组进行数据分析。在基线时和治疗 24 周后评估安全性和有效性终点。
本亚分析共纳入 2026 例患者(有胰岛素治疗经验者,n=561;无胰岛素治疗经验者,n=1465)。在所有亚组中,与基线相比,接受门冬胰岛素±OGLD 治疗 24 周后,糖化血红蛋白(各亚组均值差值范围为-1.6 至-2.4%;所有比较均 p<0.001)、空腹血糖(-2.5 至-3.8mmol/l;所有比较均 p<0.001)、早餐后餐后血糖(-3.4 至-5.8mmol/l;所有比较均 p<0.001)和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL;所有比较均 p<0.001)均有显著改善。与基线相比,接受门冬胰岛素±OGLD 治疗 24 周后,低血糖事件报告比例显著降低(无胰岛素治疗经验者:7.9-2.8%;p<0.001;有胰岛素治疗经验者:23.2-7.8%;p<0.001)。在 24 周时未报告严重低血糖事件;夜间低血糖风险<0.6 例/人年。未报告严重药物不良反应。
在血糖控制欠佳的 2 型糖尿病患者中,门冬胰岛素±OGLD 治疗可显著改善血糖控制和 HRQoL,且低血糖风险无增加。