Discipline of Psychiatry, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia,
Paediatr Drugs. 2013 Oct;15(5):377-91. doi: 10.1007/s40272-013-0032-6.
Polypharmacy, defined as the concomitant use of two or more psychotropic drugs, has become increasingly common in the paediatric and adolescent population over the past two decades. Combining psychotropic drugs leads to possible increases in benefits, but also in risks, particularly given the potential for psychotropic drug interactions. Despite the increasing use of concomitant therapy in children and adolescents, there is very little evidence from controlled clinical trials to provide guidance for prescribers. Even while acknowledging the small evidence base, clinical practice guidelines from eminent medical organizations are either relatively silent on or tend to support the use of concomitant treatments more enthusiastically than the evidence would warrant, so that practice and guidance are running ahead of the science. Our narrative review shows that the published evidence for efficacy and safety of concomitant psychotropic drugs in children and adolescents is scanty. A comprehensive search located 37 studies published over the last decade, of which 18 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). These focused mainly on stimulants, central sympatholytics (such as clonidine), antipsychotics and 'mood stabilizers'. While several small, often methodologically weak, RCTs demonstrated statistically significant advantages for dual pharmacotherapy over monotherapy, only adding central sympatholytics to stimulants for treating attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms was supported by substantial studies with an effect size large enough to suggest clinical importance. Non-randomized studies tended to have results that supported concomitant treatment, but all have design-related problems that decrease the reliability of the results. Two studies that specifically examined tolerability of combination pharmacotherapy compared with monotherapy showed significant increases in adverse effects, both subjective and objective, and other studies confirmed a statistically significant increase in adverse effects, including sedation and self-harm. Given the extent of combination therapy occurring, particularly in conditions such as ADHD, and the ambiguous evidence for benefit with clear evidence of harm, we propose that further research should be carried out as a matter of urgency. Until such a time, the attitude to combination pharmacotherapy should be conservative, and combining psychotropic medications should be considered as an 'n of 1' trial to be closely monitored.
药物合用,即同时使用两种或两种以上精神类药物,在过去二十年中,于儿科和青少年人群中变得愈发常见。合用精神类药物可能会带来益处的增加,但也会带来风险,尤其是考虑到精神类药物相互作用的可能性。尽管儿童和青少年合用治疗的应用越来越多,但对照临床试验提供的指导意见非常有限。即使承认证据基础较小,著名医学组织的临床实践指南要么对此相对保持沉默,要么倾向于比证据所证明的更热情地支持合用治疗,从而使实践和指导领先于科学。我们的叙述性综述表明,关于儿童和青少年合用精神类药物的疗效和安全性的已发表证据很少。全面检索找到过去十年发表的 37 项研究,其中 18 项为随机对照试验(RCT)。这些研究主要集中在兴奋剂、中枢交感神经兴奋剂(如可乐定)、抗精神病药和“心境稳定剂”上。虽然有几项小型、往往方法学上较弱的 RCT 表明双重药物治疗相对于单药治疗具有统计学上的显著优势,但只有足够大的研究支持在治疗注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)症状时将中枢交感神经兴奋剂添加到兴奋剂中,这才有足够的临床重要性。非随机研究的结果往往支持合用治疗,但所有研究都存在设计相关的问题,降低了结果的可靠性。两项专门比较组合药物治疗与单药治疗的耐受性的研究显示,不良反应(包括主观和客观不良反应)显著增加,其他研究也证实了不良反应的统计学显著增加,包括镇静和自伤。鉴于组合治疗的广泛应用,尤其是在 ADHD 等情况下,以及对获益的不确定证据和对危害的明确证据,我们建议应紧急开展进一步的研究。在这种情况发生之前,对组合药物治疗的态度应持保守态度,应将合用精神类药物视为密切监测的“n of 1”试验。