Suppr超能文献

种植患者的黏膜炎症与牙槽嵴骨吸收发生率:一项为期10年的研究。

Mucosal inflammation and incidence of crestal bone loss among implant patients: a 10-year study.

作者信息

Cecchinato Denis, Parpaiola Andrea, Lindhe Jan

机构信息

Institute Franci, Padova, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul;25(7):791-6. doi: 10.1111/clr.12209. Epub 2013 Jun 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this prospective study was to determine the prevalence and incidence of marginal bone loss and, in addition, peri-implantitis in subjects and implant sites after 10 years in function.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred and thirty-three subjects with a total of 407 implants that had been in function for about 5 years attended a follow-up visit in 2007 (visit 2; V2). 100 of the 133 subjects returned for a new clinical and radiographic examination in 2012 (visit 3; V3). The clinical examination included assessment of "bleeding on probing" (BoP+) and "probing pocket depth." Subjects with implant sites that in the radiograph exhibited crater-shaped marginal bone loss of >0.5 mm were identified as losers.

RESULTS

During the interval between V2 and V3 (about 5 years), 13 implants in 7 subjects exhibited progressive bone loss and were removed. The overall amount of crestal bone loss that had occurred at the remaining implants between visit 1 (V1; ≥1 year of loading) and V3 (10 years) was small (0.36 ± 1.4 mm). The bone-level reduction was twice as great between V2 and V3 as between V1 and V2. Forty subjects and 75 (26%) implant sites exhibited marginal bone loss of >0.5 mm between V1 and V3. In the interval between V2 and V3, 37 new implant sites lost significant amounts of bone. During the entire 10-year period (V1-V3), 12% of patients and 5% of implants displayed signs of peri-implantitis (bone loss >0.5 mm, BoP+, PPD ≥6 mm), while in the V2-V3 interval, the corresponding numbers were 10% (patients) and 4% (implant sites).

CONCLUSION

Sites with marginal bone loss of ≥1 mm were not common among implant patients. Peri-implantitis occurred in about 10% of patients and 4% of implant sites.

摘要

目的

本前瞻性研究的目的是确定在功能使用10年后,受试者和种植位点边缘骨丢失以及种植体周围炎的患病率和发病率。

材料与方法

2007年,133名受试者共407颗已使用约5年的种植体接受了随访(第2次随访;V2)。133名受试者中的100人于2012年返回接受新的临床和影像学检查(第3次随访;V3)。临床检查包括评估“探诊出血”(BoP+)和“探诊深度”。在X线片上显示牙槽嵴顶形边缘骨丢失>0.5mm的种植位点的受试者被确定为失败者。

结果

在V2和V3之间的间隔期(约5年),7名受试者的13颗种植体出现了进行性骨丢失并被拔除。在第1次随访(V1;加载≥1年)和V3(10年)之间,其余种植体发生的牙槽嵴顶骨丢失总量较小(0.36±1.4mm)。V2和V3之间的骨水平降低是V1和V2之间的两倍。40名受试者和75个(26%)种植位点在V1和V3之间显示边缘骨丢失>0.5mm。在V2和V3之间的间隔期,37个新的种植位点丢失了大量骨组织。在整个10年期间(V1-V3),12%的患者和5%的种植体表现出种植体周围炎的迹象(骨丢失>0.5mm,BoP+,探诊深度≥6mm),而在V2-V3间隔期,相应的数字分别为10%(患者)和4%(种植位点)。

结论

边缘骨丢失≥1mm的位点在种植患者中并不常见。种植体周围炎发生在约10%的患者和4%的种植位点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验