Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA.
Fam Process. 2013 Jun;52(2):257-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2012.01418.x. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
Using a nationally representative sample (N = 870), the present study compared long-distance romantic relationships to close-proximity romantic relationships in terms of relationship quality, commitment, and stability. Individuals in long-distance relationships generally reported higher levels of relationship quality on a number of relationship quality variables, as well as higher levels of dedication to their relationships and lower levels of feeling trapped (i.e., felt constraint), but were similar to individuals in close-proximity relationships in terms of perceived and material constraints. Although individuals in long-distance relationships perceived a lower likelihood of breaking up with their partner at the initial time point, they were as likely as the individuals in close-proximity relationships to have broken up by the follow-up assessment.
本研究使用全国代表性样本(N=870),比较了远距离恋爱关系和近距离恋爱关系在关系质量、承诺和稳定性方面的差异。远距离关系中的个体在一些关系质量变量上普遍报告了更高的关系质量水平,对关系的投入程度更高,感到被困(即感到受到限制)的程度更低,但在感知和物质限制方面与近距离关系中的个体相似。尽管远距离关系中的个体在初始时间点认为与伴侣分手的可能性较低,但他们与近距离关系中的个体在随访评估时同样有可能已经分手。