• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我该留下还是该离开?从四个方面预测约会关系的稳定性。

Should I stay or should I go? Predicting dating relationship stability from four aspects of commitment.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80209-3500, USA.

出版信息

J Fam Psychol. 2010 Oct;24(5):543-50. doi: 10.1037/a0021008.

DOI:10.1037/a0021008
PMID:20954764
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2958669/
Abstract

Many have argued that it is important to examine different aspects of commitment in romantic relationships, but few studies have done so. Using a large, national sample of unmarried adults in relationships (N = 1184), this study examined four aspects of relationship commitment and their associations with relationship adjustment and stability. We examined dedication (i.e., interpersonal commitment) as well as three types of constraint commitment: perceived constraints (e.g., social pressure to stay together or difficulty of termination procedures, measured using Stanley and Markman's [1992] Commitment Inventory), material constraints (e.g., signing a lease, owning a pet), and felt constraint (i.e., feeling trapped). Cross-sectionally, these four facets of commitment were associated in expected directions with relationship adjustment, as well as perceived likelihood of relationship termination and of marriage. Longitudinally, each facet uniquely predicted relationship stability. More dedication, more material and perceived constraints and less felt constraint were uniquely associated with a higher likelihood of staying together over an 8-month period.

摘要

许多人认为,考察浪漫关系中承诺的不同方面很重要,但很少有研究这样做。本研究使用来自于关系中的未婚成年人的大型全国样本(N=1184),考察了关系承诺的四个方面及其与关系调整和稳定的关系。我们考察了投入(即人际关系承诺)以及三种类型的约束承诺:感知约束(例如,来自于社会压力或终止程序难度的约束,使用 Stanley 和 Markman [1992] 的承诺量表来衡量)、物质约束(例如,签订租约、养宠物)和感觉约束(即感觉被困住)。在横断面上,这些承诺的四个方面以预期的方向与关系调整以及关系终止和婚姻的感知可能性相关。纵向来看,每个方面都独特地预测了关系的稳定性。更多的投入、更多的物质和感知约束以及更少的感觉约束与在 8 个月内更有可能保持在一起的可能性呈正相关。

相似文献

1
Should I stay or should I go? Predicting dating relationship stability from four aspects of commitment.我该留下还是该离开?从四个方面预测约会关系的稳定性。
J Fam Psychol. 2010 Oct;24(5):543-50. doi: 10.1037/a0021008.
2
Relationship quality, commitment, and stability in long-distance relationships.远距离关系中的关系质量、承诺和稳定性。
Fam Process. 2013 Jun;52(2):257-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2012.01418.x. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
3
Physical aggression in unmarried relationships: the roles of commitment and constraints.非婚姻关系中的身体侵犯:承诺和约束的作用。
J Fam Psychol. 2010 Dec;24(6):678-87. doi: 10.1037/a0021475.
4
The impact of the transition to cohabitation on relationship functioning: cross-sectional and longitudinal findings.从同居到婚姻的转变对关系功能的影响:横断面和纵向研究结果。
J Fam Psychol. 2012 Jun;26(3):348-58. doi: 10.1037/a0028316. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
5
Commitment Readiness and Relationship Formation.承诺准备度和关系形成。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Aug;44(8):1242-1257. doi: 10.1177/0146167218764668. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
6
Predicting commitment in young adults' physically aggressive and sexually coercive dating relationships.预测年轻成年人身体攻击和性胁迫恋爱关系中的承诺。
J Interpers Violence. 2013 Nov;28(17):3245-64. doi: 10.1177/0886260513496897. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
7
Sexual satisfaction in premarital relationships: associations with satisfaction, love, commitment, and stability.婚前关系中的性满意度:与满意度、爱情、承诺和稳定性的关联。
J Sex Res. 2002 Aug;39(3):190-6. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552141.
8
Qualitative reports of problems in cohabiting relationships: comparisons to married and dating relationships.同居关系中问题的定性报告:与婚姻关系和约会关系的比较。
J Fam Psychol. 2009 Apr;23(2):236-46. doi: 10.1037/a0015364.
9
Romantic Resilience: Fractal Conflict Dynamics and Network Flexibility Predict Dating Satisfaction and Commitment.浪漫韧性:分形冲突动态和网络灵活性预测约会满意度和承诺。
Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2024 Jul;28(3):345-367.
10
The things you do for me: perceptions of a romantic partner's investments promote gratitude and commitment.你为我做的事:对浪漫伴侣投资的看法会促进感激和承诺。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Oct;39(10):1333-45. doi: 10.1177/0146167213497801. Epub 2013 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Romantic Relationships with Virtual Agents and People's Marriage Intention in Real Life: An Exploration of the Mediation Mechanisms.与虚拟代理的浪漫关系及人们在现实生活中的结婚意愿:中介机制探究
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 May 1. doi: 10.1007/s10508-025-03143-0.
2
Loneliness and Relationship Well-Being: Investigating the Mediating Roles of Relationship Awareness and Distraction among Romantic Partners.孤独与人际关系幸福感:探究恋爱伴侣间关系意识和注意力分散的中介作用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 May 24;14(6):439. doi: 10.3390/bs14060439.
3
Does income moderate basic relationship processes?收入是否会调节基本关系过程?
J Marriage Fam. 2023 Feb;85(1):72-91. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12877. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
4
Romantic Duration, Relationship Quality, and Attachment Insecurity among Dating Couples.浪漫持续时间、恋爱关系质量和约会情侣的依恋不安全感。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 3;20(1):856. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010856.
5
Research on the relationship between marital commitment, sacrifice behavior and marital quality of military couples.军人夫妻婚姻承诺、牺牲行为与婚姻质量的关系研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 4;13:964167. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.964167. eCollection 2022.
6
Overlap of relationship distress and intimate partner violence in community samples.社区样本中关系困扰和亲密伴侣暴力的重叠。
J Fam Psychol. 2023 Feb;37(1):37-44. doi: 10.1037/fam0001031. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
7
Commitment and Extra-Dyadic Sexual Activity in College Students' Friends with Benefits Relationships: Moderating Effects of Gender.大学生“友达以上,恋人未满”关系中的承诺与婚外性行为:性别的调节作用
J Sex Res. 2023 Oct;60(8):1181-1192. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2021.2022585. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
8
Chinese Newlyweds' Perception and Tolerance Toward Common and Severe Partner Aggression.中国新婚夫妇对伴侣常见及严重攻击行为的认知与容忍度
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Dec 10;14:1981-1991. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S337263. eCollection 2021.
9
Political Party Identification and Romantic Relationship Quality.政党认同与浪漫关系质量。
Couple Family Psychol. 2020 Sep;9(3):167-180. doi: 10.1037/cfp0000141. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
10
Within-Couple Associations Between Communication and Relationship Satisfaction Over Time.夫妻间沟通与关系满意度的随时间变化的关联。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 Apr;48(4):534-549. doi: 10.1177/01461672211016920. Epub 2021 May 24.

本文引用的文献

1
A Longitudinal Investigation of Commitment Dynamics in Cohabiting Relationships.同居关系中承诺动态的纵向调查。
J Fam Issues. 2012 Mar 1;33(3):369-390. doi: 10.1177/0192513X11420940. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
2
The Revised Commitment Inventory: Psychometrics and Use with Unmarried Couples.修订后的承诺量表:心理测量学及其在未婚伴侣中的应用。
J Fam Issues. 2011 Jun;32(6):820-841. doi: 10.1177/0192513X10385788. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
3
Commitment: Functions, Formation, and the Securing of Romantic Attachment.承诺:功能、形成与浪漫依恋的维系
J Fam Theory Rev. 2010 Dec 1;2(4):243-257. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00060.x.
4
Nonmarital romantic relationship commitment and leave behavior: the mediating role of dissolution consideration.非婚姻浪漫关系承诺与离职行为:解除关系考虑的中介作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Sep;35(9):1220-32. doi: 10.1177/0146167209337543. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
5
Sunken costs and desired plans: examining different types of investments in close relationships.沉没成本与期望计划:审视亲密关系中的不同类型投资
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Dec;34(12):1639-52. doi: 10.1177/0146167208323743. Epub 2008 Sep 8.
6
Development and validation of a brief version of the dyadic adjustment scale with a nonparametric item analysis model.采用非参数项目分析模型的二元调适量表简版的编制与验证
Psychol Assess. 2005 Mar;17(1):15-27. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.17.1.15.
7
Timing is everything: Pre-engagement cohabitation and increased risk for poor marital outcomes.时机至关重要:婚前同居与婚姻不良结局风险增加。
J Fam Psychol. 2004 Jun;18(2):311-318. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.18.2.311.
8
Construction of preferences by constraint satisfaction.通过约束满足构建偏好
Psychol Sci. 2004 May;15(5):331-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00678.x.
9
Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects.检测交互作用和调节效应的统计学难点。
Psychol Bull. 1993 Sep;114(2):376-90. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376.