Suppr超能文献

走进还是分手?距离在浪漫关系发展中的作用。

Moving in or Breaking Up? The Role of Distance in the Development of Romantic Relationships.

作者信息

Krapf Sandra

机构信息

Institute of Sociology and Social Psychology, University of Cologne, Greinstr. 2, 50939 Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Popul. 2017 May 24;34(3):313-336. doi: 10.1007/s10680-017-9428-2. eCollection 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Most romantic relationships start with a living apart together (LAT) phase during which the partners live in two separate households. Over time, a couple might decide to move in together, to separate, or to remain together while maintaining their nonresidential status. This study investigates the competing risks that partners in a LAT relationship will experience the transition to coresidence or to separation. We consider the amount of time LAT partners have to travel to see each other to be a key determinant of relationship development. For our statistical analyses, we use seven waves of the German Family Panel Pairfam (2008/2009-2014/2015) and analyze couples in the age group 20-40 years. We distinguish between short-distance relationships (the partners have to travel less than one hour) and long-distance relationships (the partners have to travel one hour or more). Estimating a competing risks model, we find that couples in long-distance relationships are more likely to separate than those living in close proximity. By contrast, the probability of experiencing a transition to coresidence is lower for LAT couples in long-distance than for those in short-distance relationships. Interaction analyses reveal that distance seems to be irrelevant for the relationship development of couples with two nonemployed (unemployed, in education or other inactive) partners.

摘要

大多数浪漫关系始于“分开同居”阶段,在此期间,伴侣双方生活在两个独立的住所。随着时间推移,情侣可能会决定搬到一起住、分开,或者保持非同居状态继续在一起。本研究调查了处于“分开同居”关系中的伴侣向同居或分居转变时面临的竞争风险。我们认为“分开同居”伴侣见面所需的出行时间是关系发展的一个关键决定因素。在统计分析中,我们使用了德国家庭小组Pairfam的七轮数据(2008/2009 - 2014/2015),并分析了年龄在20至40岁之间的情侣。我们区分了短距离关系(伴侣出行时间少于一小时)和长距离关系(伴侣出行时间为一小时或更长时间)。通过估计一个竞争风险模型,我们发现处于长距离关系中的情侣比住得近的情侣更有可能分开。相比之下,与短距离关系的“分开同居”情侣相比,长距离关系的“分开同居”情侣向同居转变的概率更低。交互分析表明,对于双方均无工作(失业、在接受教育或处于其他非活跃状态)的伴侣组成的情侣,距离似乎与关系发展无关。

相似文献

7
"Living Apart Together" relationships in the United States.美国的“分开同居”关系。
Demogr Res. 2009 Aug 13;21:177-214. doi: 10.4054/demres.2009.21.7.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Marital Dissolution Among Interracial Couples.跨种族伴侣中的婚姻解体
J Marriage Fam. 2009 Feb 1;71(1):95-107. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00582.x.
5
Cohabitation, post-conception unions, and the rise in nonmarital fertility.同居、怀孕后的结合以及非婚生育的增加。
Soc Sci Res. 2014 Sep;47:134-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
8
Relationship quality, commitment, and stability in long-distance relationships.远距离关系中的关系质量、承诺和稳定性。
Fam Process. 2013 Jun;52(2):257-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2012.01418.x. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
9
Class Differences in Cohabitation Processes.同居过程中的阶层差异。
Fam Relat. 2011 Apr 1;60(2):163-177. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00640.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验