Suppr超能文献

健康冲击是否不同?来自老挝多冲击调查的证据。

Are health shocks different? Evidence from a multishock survey in Laos.

机构信息

Development Research Group, The World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2014 Jun;23(6):706-18. doi: 10.1002/hec.2944. Epub 2013 Jun 13.

Abstract

Using primary data from Laos, we compare a broad range of different types of shocks in terms of their incidence, distribution between the poor and the better off, idiosyncrasy, costs, coping responses, and self-reported impacts on well-being. Health shocks are more common than most other shocks, more concentrated among the poor, more idiosyncratic, more costly, trigger more coping strategies, and highly likely to lead to a cut in consumption. Household members experiencing a health shock lost, on average, 0.6 point on a five-point health scale; the wealthier are better able to limit the health impacts of a health shock.

摘要

我们使用老挝的原始数据,从发生率、穷人和富人之间的分布、特殊性、成本、应对措施以及对幸福感的自我报告影响等方面,对广泛的不同类型的冲击进行了比较。健康冲击比大多数其他冲击更为常见,更集中在穷人中,更具特殊性,成本更高,引发更多应对策略,并且极有可能导致消费减少。经历健康冲击的家庭平均在五分制的健康量表上损失了 0.6 分;富人更有能力限制健康冲击对健康的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验