• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较预防上颈部与全颈照射治疗无淋巴结转移鼻咽癌患者的随机临床试验。

A randomized clinical trial comparing prophylactic upper versus whole-neck irradiation in the treatment of patients with node-negative nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China.

出版信息

Cancer. 2013 Sep 1;119(17):3170-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28201. Epub 2013 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.28201
PMID:23765713
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study sought to compare the clinical outcomes of upper versus whole-neck prophylactic irradiation in the treatment of patients with node-negative nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

Between November 2005 and June 2012, 301 patients with node-negative NPC were randomly assigned to receive primary plus prophylactic upper neck irradiation (UNI, 153 patients) or primary plus whole-neck irradiation (WNI, 148 patients). Patients in both groups received irradiation to the primary tumor and the upper neck nodal regions, and patients in the WNI group also received irradiation to the lower neck. The main endpoint of the study was to compare the lower neck control rate between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up period of 39 months (range, 6-84 months), no patient in either group had a cervical node relapse. The overall survival at 3 years was 89.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 84.1%-95.0%) in the UNI group and 87.4% (95% CI = 81.4%-93.5%) in the WNI group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.866, 95% CI = 0.41-1.82; P = .70). The 3-year relapse-free survival rate was 89.8% and 89.3% (95% CI = 84.2%-95.3% and 83.7%-94.8%, HR = 0.914, 95% CI = 0.42-2.00; P = .82), and the 3-year metastasis-free survival rate was 91.7% and 90.9% (95% CI = 87.0%-96.5% and 85.7%-96.1%) for the UNI and WNI groups, respectively (HR = 1.007, 95% CI = 0.44-2.32; P = .99).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic upper neck irradiation is sufficient for patients with node-negative NPC.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较局部预防性上颈部照射与全颈部预防性照射治疗无颈部淋巴结转移的鼻咽癌(NPC)患者的临床结局。

方法

2005 年 11 月至 2012 年 6 月,301 例无颈部淋巴结转移的 NPC 患者被随机分为两组,分别接受原发灶加预防性上颈部照射(UNI 组,153 例)或原发灶加全颈部照射(WNI 组,148 例)。两组患者均接受原发灶和上颈部区域的照射,WNI 组患者还接受下颈部照射。本研究的主要终点是比较两组患者的下颈部控制率。

结果

中位随访时间为 39 个月(范围 6-84 个月),两组患者均无颈淋巴结复发。UNI 组 3 年总生存率为 89.5%(95%置信区间[CI]:84.1%-95.0%),WNI 组为 87.4%(95% CI:81.4%-93.5%)(风险比[HR]:0.866,95% CI:0.41-1.82;P=0.70)。3 年无复发生存率分别为 89.8%和 89.3%(95% CI:84.2%-95.3%和 83.7%-94.8%,HR:0.914,95% CI:0.42-2.00;P=0.82),3 年无远处转移生存率分别为 91.7%和 90.9%(95% CI:87.0%-96.5%和 85.7%-96.1%)(HR:1.007,95% CI:0.44-2.32;P=0.99)。

结论

对于无颈部淋巴结转移的 NPC 患者,预防性上颈部照射是足够的。

相似文献

1
A randomized clinical trial comparing prophylactic upper versus whole-neck irradiation in the treatment of patients with node-negative nasopharyngeal carcinoma.一项比较预防上颈部与全颈照射治疗无淋巴结转移鼻咽癌患者的随机临床试验。
Cancer. 2013 Sep 1;119(17):3170-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28201. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
2
Comparative study on prophylactic irradiation to the whole neck and to the upper neck for patients with neck lymph node-negative nasopharyngeal carcinoma.颈部淋巴结阴性鼻咽癌患者全颈与上颈预防性照射的比较研究
Head Neck. 2014 May;36(5):687-93. doi: 10.1002/hed.23359. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
3
Evidence on Effectiveness of Upper Neck Irradiation Versus Whole Neck Irradiation as Elective Neck Irradiation in Node-Negative Nasopharyngeal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.上颈部照射与全颈部照射作为鼻咽癌阴性淋巴结患者选择性颈部照射的有效性证据:一项荟萃分析
J Glob Oncol. 2018 Sep;4:1-11. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2016.006759. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
4
[Radiotherapy on neck for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with negative cervical lymph node].鼻咽癌颈部淋巴结阴性患者的颈部放疗
Ai Zheng. 2005 May;24(5):627-30.
5
Elective upper-neck versus whole-neck irradiation of the uninvolved neck in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial.选择性上颈部与不涉及颈部的全颈部照射治疗鼻咽癌患者的疗效比较:一项开放标签、非劣效性、多中心、随机 3 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Apr;23(4):479-490. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00058-4. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
6
[Prophylactic irradiation of cervical lymph nodes for Stage-N0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma].[N0期鼻咽癌颈淋巴结的预防性照射]
Chin J Cancer. 2010 Jan;29(1):106-10. doi: 10.5732/cjc.009.10297.
7
Feasibility of ipsilateral lower neck sparing irradiation for unilateral or bilateral neck node-negative nasopharyngeal carcinoma: systemic review and meta-analysis of 2, 521 patients.单侧或双侧颈部淋巴结阴性鼻咽癌同侧下颈部免于照射的可行性:2521 例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Aug 6;13(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-1087-x.
8
Treatment outcome of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with retropharyngeal lymph nodes metastasis only and the feasibility of elective neck irradiation.仅伴有咽后淋巴结转移的鼻咽癌治疗转归及选择性颈淋巴结照射的可行性。
Oral Oncol. 2012 Oct;48(10):1045-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.04.011. Epub 2012 May 24.
9
Upper-Neck Versus Whole-Neck Irradiation at the Contralateral Uninvolved Neck in Patients With Unilateral N3 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.单侧 N3 期鼻咽癌患者对侧未累及颈行上颈部与全颈部放疗的比较。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 Jul 15;116(4):788-796. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.12.041. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
10
Treatment outcomes and feasibility of partial neck irradiation for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma with only retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis after intensity-modulated radiotherapy.调强放疗后仅出现咽后淋巴结转移的鼻咽癌患者行颈部局部照射的治疗效果及可行性
Head Neck. 2014 Apr;36(4):468-73. doi: 10.1002/hed.23314. Epub 2013 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of elective neck irradiation in treating node-negative nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a meta-analysis.选择性颈部放疗治疗淋巴结阴性鼻咽癌患者的可行性:一项荟萃分析。
Front Oncol. 2025 May 22;15:1456724. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1456724. eCollection 2025.
2
A multicenter dataset for lymph node clinical target volume delineation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.多中心数据集用于鼻咽癌淋巴结临床靶区勾画。
Sci Data. 2024 Oct 4;11(1):1085. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03890-0.
3
Recent advances in early detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
鼻咽癌早期检测的最新进展
Discov Oncol. 2024 Aug 23;15(1):365. doi: 10.1007/s12672-024-01242-3.
4
Early Stage and Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treatment from Present to Future: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?早期和局部晚期鼻咽癌治疗:从现在到未来,我们在哪里,我们要去哪里?
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2023 Jul;24(7):845-866. doi: 10.1007/s11864-023-01083-2. Epub 2023 May 5.
5
Lower-Neck Sparing Using Proton Therapy in Patients with Uninvolved Neck Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Is It Safe?未累及颈部的鼻咽癌患者采用质子治疗保留下颈部:安全吗?
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 9;11(12):3297. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123297.
6
The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.中国临床肿瘤学会(CSCO)鼻咽癌诊断与治疗临床指南。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2021 Nov;41(11):1195-1227. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12218. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
7
Contralateral Lower Neck Sparing Radiotherapy in Stage N1 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Long-Term Survival Outcomes and Late Toxicities.N1期鼻咽癌对侧下颈部保留放疗:长期生存结果和晚期毒性
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 25;11:628919. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.628919. eCollection 2021.
8
Prediction of local recurrence and distant metastasis using radiomics analysis of pretreatment nasopharyngeal [18F]FDG PET/CT images.基于治疗前鼻咽部 [18F]FDG PET/CT 图像的放射组学分析预测局部复发和远处转移。
Ann Nucl Med. 2021 Apr;35(4):458-468. doi: 10.1007/s12149-021-01585-9. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
9
Thyroid dose-volume thresholds for the risk of radiation-related hypothyroidism in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy-A single-institution study.调强放疗治疗鼻咽癌后放射性甲状腺功能减退风险的甲状腺剂量-体积阈值:单中心研究。
Cancer Med. 2019 Nov;8(16):6887-6893. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2574. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
10
Design of a microfluidic chip consisting of micropillars and its use for the enrichment of nasopharyngeal cancer cells.一种由微柱组成的微流控芯片的设计及其用于鼻咽癌细胞富集的用途。
Oncol Lett. 2019 Feb;17(2):1581-1588. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9771. Epub 2018 Nov 28.