文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

将人因工程学/工效学发展为设计学科。

Developing human factors/ergonomics as a design discipline.

机构信息

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, P.O. Box 1000, 02044 VTT, Finland.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2014 Jan;45(1):61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.024. Epub 2013 Jun 13.


DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.024
PMID:23768732
Abstract

This paper deals with internal challenges that the human factors/ergonomics (HFE) research faces when wishing to strengthen its contribution to development of work systems. Three established characteristics of high-quality HFE, i.e., HFE takes a systems approach, HFE is design-driven, and HFE focuses on two closely related outcomes, performance and well-being, are taken as a starting point of a methodological discussion, in which conceptual innovations, e.g. adopting the technology-in-use perspective, are proposed to support development of HFE towards the high-quality aims. The feasibility of the proposed conceptual choices is demonstrated by introducing a naturalistic HFE analysis approach including four HFE functions. The gained experience of the use of this approach in a number of complex work domains allows the conclusion that becoming design-driven appears as that most difficult quality target for HFE to reach. Creating an own design discipline identity in a multi-voiced collaboration is the key internal challenge for human factors/ergonomics.

摘要

本文探讨了人类因素/工效学(HFE)研究在希望加强其对工作系统发展的贡献时所面临的内部挑战。本文以高质量 HFE 的三个既定特征为起点,即 HFE 采用系统方法、HFE 以设计为导向以及 HFE 关注两个密切相关的结果,即绩效和福祉,展开了方法学讨论,提出了概念创新,例如采用使用中的技术视角,以支持 HFE 朝着高质量目标发展。通过引入包括四个 HFE 功能的自然主义 HFE 分析方法,证明了所提出的概念选择的可行性。在一些复杂的工作领域中使用这种方法所获得的经验使我们得出结论,成为以设计为导向似乎是 HFE 最难达到的质量目标。在多声音协作中创造自己的设计学科身份是人类因素/工效学面临的关键内部挑战。

相似文献

[1]
Developing human factors/ergonomics as a design discipline.

Appl Ergon. 2013-6-13

[2]
Ergonomics and human factors: the paradigms for science, engineering, design, technology and management of human-compatible systems.

Ergonomics. 2005-4-15

[3]
Human factors/ergonomics as a systems discipline? "The human use of human beings" revisited.

Appl Ergon. 2013-5-2

[4]
A strategy for human factors/ergonomics: developing the discipline and profession.

Ergonomics. 2012-2-15

[5]
Evidence-based ergonomics: a model and conceptual structure proposal.

Work. 2012

[6]
Factors affecting the appreciation generated through applying human factors/ergonomics (HFE) principles to systems of work.

Appl Ergon. 2013-5-29

[7]
Enhanced ergonomics approaches for product design: a user experience ecosystem perspective and case studies.

Ergonomics. 2014

[8]
Human factors and ergonomics for primary care.

Educ Prim Care. 2016-3

[9]
Tertiary education in ergonomics and human factors: quo vadis?

Ergonomics. 2019-12-12

[10]
Fitting methods to paradigms: are ergonomics methods fit for systems thinking?

Ergonomics. 2017-2

引用本文的文献

[1]
Principles for the conduct of human factors/ergonomics in healthcare: a scoping study of the published evidence.

BMJ Open Qual. 2025-4-3

[2]
With Crisis Comes Opportunity: Redesigning Performance Departments of Elite Sports Clubs for Life After a Global Pandemic.

Front Psychol. 2021-1-20

[3]
The ANEMONE: Theoretical Foundations for UX Evaluation of Action and Intention Recognition in Human-Robot Interaction.

Sensors (Basel). 2020-7-31

[4]
Why and How to Approach User Experience in Safety-Critical Domains: The Example of Health Care.

Hum Factors. 2021-8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索