• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响通过应用人因/工效学(HFE)原则来提高系统工作效率的因素。

Factors affecting the appreciation generated through applying human factors/ergonomics (HFE) principles to systems of work.

机构信息

Department of Industrial Engineering and Logistics Management, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clearwater Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2014 Jan;45(1):99-109. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.019. Epub 2013 May 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.019
PMID:23726141
Abstract

This retrospective study examined the levels of appreciation (applause) given by clients to Human Factors/Ergonomic (HFE) specialists after they have modified the systems of work. Thirteen non-academic projects were chosen because the HFE interventions involved changed the way workers work at their workplaces. Companies involved range from multi-national corporations and military organizations with thousands of employees to small trading companies with less than 10 employees. In 5 cases the HFE recommendations were fully adopted and well appreciated. In 4 they were largely ignored and not appreciated, with partial adoption and some appreciation in the other 4 cases. Three factors that predict appreciation were identified: (i) alignment between the benefits HFE can provide and the project's key performance indices; (ii) awareness of HFE among the client's senior management; and (iii) a team organization appropriate for applying HFE recommendations. Having an HFE specialist on the client's side can greatly increase levels of appreciation, but lack of such a specialist will not affect levels of appreciation. A clear contractual requirement for HFE intervention does not promote appreciation significantly, but its absence can greatly reduce levels of appreciation. These relationships are discussed using the Kano's model of quality. Means to generate greater appreciation of the benefits of HFE are discussed.

摘要

本回顾性研究考察了客户在 HFE 专家修改工作系统后对其工作的满意度(掌声)。选择了 13 个非学术项目,因为 HFE 干预措施改变了工人在工作场所的工作方式。所涉及的公司范围从拥有数千名员工的跨国公司和军事组织到员工少于 10 人的小型贸易公司。在 5 个案例中,HFE 的建议得到了充分采纳并得到了高度赞赏。在 4 个案例中,这些建议被很大程度上忽视和不被认可,而在其他 4 个案例中则部分采纳并得到了一些认可。确定了三个可以预测赞赏的因素:(i)HFE 能够提供的利益与项目的关键绩效指标之间的一致性;(ii)客户的高级管理层对 HFE 的认识;(iii)适合应用 HFE 建议的团队组织。在客户一方拥有 HFE 专家可以大大提高赞赏水平,但缺乏这样的专家并不会影响赞赏水平。明确要求 HFE 干预的合同并不能显著提高赞赏度,但缺乏这种合同可能会大大降低赞赏度。使用卡诺模型讨论了这些关系。还讨论了产生更高 HFE 效益赞赏度的方法。

相似文献

1
Factors affecting the appreciation generated through applying human factors/ergonomics (HFE) principles to systems of work.影响通过应用人因/工效学(HFE)原则来提高系统工作效率的因素。
Appl Ergon. 2014 Jan;45(1):99-109. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.019. Epub 2013 May 29.
2
Human factors/ergonomics as a systems discipline? "The human use of human beings" revisited.作为系统学科的人因工程学/人类工效学?再谈“人本主义的运用”。
Appl Ergon. 2014 Jan;45(1):40-4. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.024. Epub 2013 May 2.
3
Developing human factors/ergonomics as a design discipline.将人因工程学/工效学发展为设计学科。
Appl Ergon. 2014 Jan;45(1):61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.024. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
4
Do ergonomics improvements increase computer workers' productivity?: an intervention study in a call centre.人体工程学的改进能否提高计算机工作者的生产力?一项在呼叫中心进行的干预研究。
Ergonomics. 2003 Jan 15;46(1-3):3-18. doi: 10.1080/00140130303522.
5
Human factors engineering in oil and gas--a review of industry guidance.石油和天然气行业中的人因工程——行业指南综述
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:752-62. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0236-752.
6
Work from home: Facilitators for an effective ergonomic work system.居家办公:有效人体工程学工作系统的促进因素。
Appl Ergon. 2024 Jul;118:104276. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104276. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
7
Workplace ergonomics in lean production environments: A literature review.精益生产环境中的工作场所人机工程学:文献综述。
Work. 2015;52(1):57-70. doi: 10.3233/WOR-141941.
8
Human factors and ergonomics for primary care.初级保健中的人为因素与工效学
Educ Prim Care. 2016 Mar;27(2):86-93. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2016.1152658.
9
Ergonomics and human factors: the paradigms for science, engineering, design, technology and management of human-compatible systems.人体工程学与人为因素:适用于人类兼容系统的科学、工程、设计、技术及管理的范式。
Ergonomics. 2005 Apr 15;48(5):436-63. doi: 10.1080/00140130400029167.
10
Participatory ergonomics for psychological factors evaluation in work system design.工作系统设计中用于心理因素评估的参与式人机工程学
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:2866-71. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0658-2866.