Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2013 Jun 15;9(6):537-41. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.2742.
To compare the impact of a group educational program versus individual education on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) adherence.
Post hoc assessment of a performance improvement initiative designed to improve clinic efficiency, access to care, and time to initiate therapy. Consecutive patients newly diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) initiating CPAP therapy participated in either an individual or group educational program. The content and information was similar in both strategies.
Of 2,116 included patients, 1,032 received education regarding OSA and CPAP through a group clinic, and 1,084 received individual education. Among the cohort, 76.6% were men, mean age 48.3 ± 9.2 years, mean body mass index 29.6 ± 4.6 kg/m(2), and mean apnea-hypopnea index was 33.3 ± 24.4 events/hour. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. CPAP adherence was significantly greater in those participating in a group program than those receiving individual education. Specifically, CPAP was used for more nights (67.2% vs. 62.1%, p = 0.02) and more hours per night during nights used (4.3 ± 2.1 vs. 3.7 ± 2.8, p = 0.03). Further, fewer individuals discontinued therapy (10.6% vs. 14.5%, p < 0.001), more achieved regular use of CPAP (45.2%. vs. 40.6%, p = 0.08), and time to initiate therapy was shorter (13.2 ± 3.1 versus 24.6 ± 7.4 days, p < 0.001). Group education resulted in a 3- to 4-fold increase in the number of patients seen per unit time.
A group educational program facilitated improved CPAP adherence. If confirmed by prospective randomized studies, group CPAP education may be an appropriate alternative to individual counseling, may improve acceptance of and adherence to therapy, and decrease time to treatment.
比较团体教育计划与个体教育对持续气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗依从性的影响。
这是一项提高临床效率、改善医疗服务可及性和启动治疗时间的绩效改进计划的事后评估。新诊断为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)并开始 CPAP 治疗的连续患者参加了团体教育或个体教育计划。两种策略的内容和信息相似。
在纳入的 2116 名患者中,有 1032 名患者通过团体诊所接受了关于 OSA 和 CPAP 的教育,1084 名患者接受了个体教育。在队列中,76.6%为男性,平均年龄 48.3±9.2 岁,平均体重指数 29.6±4.6kg/m²,平均呼吸暂停低通气指数为 33.3±24.4 次/小时。两组患者的基线特征相似。参加团体教育计划的患者 CPAP 依从性明显高于接受个体教育的患者。具体而言,CPAP 使用的夜间(67.2% vs. 62.1%,p=0.02)和夜间使用的每小时(4.3±2.1 vs. 3.7±2.8,p=0.03)均更多。此外,停止治疗的患者更少(10.6% vs. 14.5%,p<0.001),更多患者实现了 CPAP 的定期使用(45.2% vs. 40.6%,p=0.08),治疗启动时间更短(13.2±3.1 与 24.6±7.4 天,p<0.001)。团体教育使单位时间内就诊患者数量增加了 3-4 倍。
团体教育计划促进了 CPAP 治疗的依从性。如果前瞻性随机研究得到证实,团体 CPAP 教育可能是个体咨询的合适替代方案,可提高治疗的接受度和依从性,并缩短治疗时间。