Suppr超能文献

比较伊维菌素口服与林丹洗剂 1%治疗疥疮的疗效。

Comparison of oral ivermectin vs. lindane lotion 1% for the treatment of scabies.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Department of mathematics Ardebil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.

出版信息

Clin Exp Dermatol. 2013 Oct;38(7):719-23. doi: 10.1111/ced.12079. Epub 2013 Jun 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Scabies is a common parasitic infestation that is an important public-health problem in many resource-poor regions. It is commonly treated with the insecticides ivermectin and permethrin.

AIM

To compare the efficacy and safety of oral ivermectin vs. lindane lotion 1% for the treatment of scabies.

METHODS

In total, 148 patients with scabies were enrolled, and were randomized into two groups: the first group received a single dose of oral ivermectin 200 μg/kg body weight, and the second group were treated with two applications of topical lindane lotion 1%, with a 1-week interval between applications. Treatment was evaluated at intervals of 2 and 4 weeks, and if there was treatment failure at the 2-week follow-up, treatment was repeated.

RESULTS

A single dose of ivermectin provided a cure rate of 60.8% at the 2-week follow-up, which increased to 89.1% at the 4-week follow-up. after crossing over to the lindane lotion 1% group. Treatment with two applications of lindane lotion 1%, with a 1-week interval between them, was effective in 47.2% of patients at the 2-week follow-up, which increased to 72.9% at the 4-week follow-up after this treatment was repeated.

CONCLUSIONS

A single dose of ivermectin was as effective as two applications of lindane lotion 1% at the 2-week follow-up. After repeat treatment, ivermectin was superior to lindane lotion 1% at the 4-week follow up. The delay in clinical response with ivermectin suggests that it may not be effective against all the stages in the life cycle of the parasite.

摘要

背景

疥疮是一种常见的寄生虫感染,在许多资源匮乏的地区是一个重要的公共卫生问题。它通常用伊维菌素和扑灭司林等杀虫剂治疗。

目的

比较口服伊维菌素与 1%林丹洗剂治疗疥疮的疗效和安全性。

方法

共纳入 148 例疥疮患者,随机分为两组:第一组给予伊维菌素 200μg/kg 单剂量口服,第二组给予 1%林丹洗剂 2 次,间隔 1 周。治疗后 2 周和 4 周进行评估,如果 2 周随访时治疗失败,则重复治疗。

结果

伊维菌素单剂量在 2 周随访时的治愈率为 60.8%,在 4 周随访时增加到 89.1%。在交叉至 1%林丹洗剂组后。2 周随访时,林丹洗剂 1%两次应用,间隔 1 周,有效率为 47.2%,重复治疗后 4 周随访时增加到 72.9%。

结论

伊维菌素单剂量与林丹洗剂 1%两次应用在 2 周随访时疗效相同。重复治疗后,伊维菌素在 4 周随访时优于林丹洗剂 1%。伊维菌素临床反应延迟提示其可能对寄生虫生活史的所有阶段都没有效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验