Wesley Neurology Clinic, Memphis, TN, USA.
Headache. 2013 Jul-Aug;53(7):1134-46. doi: 10.1111/head.12140. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the factors that influence a migraineur's beliefs regarding oral triptans for the acute treatment of migraines and to provide further insight into patients' decision-making process when faced with migraine. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study of subjects currently prescribed an oral triptan medication for the acute treatment of migraine headaches. Subjects were recruited from 6 headache clinics and one primary care practice in the United States. Enrolled subjects completed a questionnaire that could be completed either at the site as part of the visit or at home. The questionnaire comprised 27 questions assessing demographic characteristics, migraine history, migraine frequency and severity, and general beliefs about migraine treatments. The study population was stratified into 2 cohorts (Early Treatment and Delayed Treatment) based on how they typically use their oral triptan to treat a typical migraine. RESULTS: A total 506 subjects were enrolled in the study, of which 502 were stratified into the Early Treatment cohort (41.2%) and Delayed Treatment cohort (58.8%). Demographic and clinical characteristics were generally similar between the 2 cohorts. In terms of general treatment patterns, there were notable differences between the Delayed and Early Treatment cohorts, with the Delayed Treatment cohort significantly more likely to take an over-the-counter (OTC) or non-triptan medication first (P ≤ .001) and only take a triptan if the OTC or non-triptan medication did not work (P ≤ .001). Furthermore, 55% of the Delayed Treatment cohort delayed taking a triptan to be certain that the headache was a migraine (vs 32% of the Early Treatment cohort; P ≤ .001). When asked to specify the reasons for delaying treatment with a triptan, the Delayed Treatment cohort had, in general, greater concerns about using their oral triptan in comparison with the Early Treatment cohort. In particular, respondents were primarily concerned with running out of their triptan medication with 35% of the Delayed Treatment cohort expressing this concern compared with 22% of the Early Treatment cohort (P ≤ .001). Statistically significant differences were also noted for concerns about taking medications (P ≤ .001), side effects (P ≤ .05), expense (P ≤ .01), and taking prescription medications (P ≤ .001). CONCLUSIONS: Results build upon previously published studies and suggest that patient beliefs directly influence how migraineurs manage their migraines and have implications for patient outcomes. Such insights should be used to facilitate physician-patient communication and reinforce the need for patient-centered care to improve patient outcomes.
目的:调查影响偏头痛患者对口服曲坦类药物急性治疗偏头痛的信念的因素,并进一步深入了解患者在面临偏头痛时的决策过程。
方法:这是一项多中心、横断面、观察性研究,研究对象为目前正在服用口服曲坦类药物治疗偏头痛急性发作的患者。研究对象从美国的 6 家头痛诊所和 1 家初级保健机构招募。入组的患者完成了一份问卷,该问卷可以在现场作为就诊的一部分完成,也可以在家中完成。问卷共包含 27 个问题,评估人口统计学特征、偏头痛病史、偏头痛发作频率和严重程度以及偏头痛治疗的一般信念。根据他们通常如何使用口服曲坦类药物来治疗典型偏头痛,将研究人群分为 2 个队列(早期治疗和延迟治疗)。
结果:共纳入 506 名患者,其中 502 名患者被分为早期治疗队列(41.2%)和延迟治疗队列(58.8%)。两个队列的人口统计学和临床特征一般相似。在一般治疗模式方面,延迟治疗队列与早期治疗队列之间存在显著差异,延迟治疗队列更有可能首先服用非处方(OTC)或非曲坦类药物(P≤.001),只有在 OTC 或非曲坦类药物无效时才会服用曲坦类药物(P≤.001)。此外,55%的延迟治疗队列会延迟使用曲坦类药物,以确定头痛是否为偏头痛(而早期治疗队列为 32%;P≤.001)。当被问及延迟使用曲坦类药物治疗的原因时,与早期治疗队列相比,延迟治疗队列通常对使用口服曲坦类药物有更大的担忧。特别是,有 35%的延迟治疗队列的受访者主要担心他们的曲坦类药物会用完,而早期治疗队列这一比例为 22%(P≤.001)。对于服用药物的担忧(P≤.001)、副作用(P≤.05)、费用(P≤.01)和服用处方药(P≤.001),也有统计学显著差异。
结论:研究结果与之前发表的研究一致,表明患者的信念直接影响偏头痛患者管理偏头痛的方式,并对患者结局产生影响。这些发现应被用于促进医患沟通,并强化以患者为中心的护理理念,以改善患者结局。
Headache. 2024-4