Suppr超能文献

你是用脑还是用心?自我定位预测个性、情绪、决策和表现。

Do you use your head or follow your heart? Self-location predicts personality, emotion, decision making, and performance.

机构信息

Psychology Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108-6050, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Aug;105(2):316-34. doi: 10.1037/a0033374. Epub 2013 Jun 17.

Abstract

The head is thought to be rational and cold, whereas the heart is thought to be emotional and warm. In 8 studies (total N = 725), we pursued the idea that such body metaphors are widely consequential. Study 1 introduced a novel individual difference variable, one asking people to locate the self in the head or the heart. Irrespective of sex differences, head-locators characterized themselves as rational, logical, and interpersonally cold, whereas heart-locators characterized themselves as emotional, feminine, and interpersonally warm (Studies 1-3). Study 4 showed that head-locators were more accurate in answering general knowledge questions and had higher grade point averages, and Study 5 showed that heart-locators were more likely to favor emotional over rational considerations in moral decision making. Study 6 linked self-locations to reactivity phenomena in daily life--for example, heart-locators experienced greater negative emotion on high stressor days. In Study 7, we manipulated attention to the head versus the heart and found that head-pointing facilitated intellectual performance, whereas heart-pointing led to emotional decision making. Study 8 replicated Study 3's findings with a nearly year-long delay between the self-location and outcome measures. The findings converge on the importance of head-heart metaphors for understanding individual differences in cognition, emotion, and performance.

摘要

人们通常认为大脑是理性且冷静的,而心脏是感性且温暖的。在 8 项研究(共 725 人)中,我们探究了这种身体隐喻具有广泛影响这一观点。研究 1 引入了一个新的个体差异变量,要求人们将自我定位在头部或心脏。无论性别差异如何,将自我定位在头部的人将自己描述为理性、逻辑和人际交往冷漠,而将自我定位在心脏的人将自己描述为感性、女性化和人际交往温暖(研究 1-3)。研究 4 表明,将自我定位在头部的人在回答常识问题和获得更高的平均绩点方面更准确,研究 5 表明,在道德决策中,将自我定位在心脏的人更倾向于情感而不是理性的考虑。研究 6 将自我定位与日常生活中的反应性现象联系起来,例如,将自我定位在心脏的人在高压力日经历更大的负面情绪。在研究 7 中,我们操纵了对头部和心脏的关注,发现指向头部促进了智力表现,而指向心脏则导致了情感决策。研究 8 用近一年的时间延迟来重复研究 3 的发现,结果证明了头部-心脏隐喻对理解认知、情感和表现个体差异的重要性。

相似文献

2
No evidence for the influence of head-heart conceptual metaphor on moral decision making and personality.
J Gen Psychol. 2025 Apr-Jun;152(2):192-219. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2024.2360405. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
9
Impact of personality on the cerebral processing of emotional prosody.人格对情绪韵律的大脑加工的影响。
Neuroimage. 2011 Sep 1;58(1):259-68. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.005. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
10
Incidental emotions influence risk preference and outcome evaluation.偶然情绪会影响风险偏好和结果评估。
Psychophysiology. 2016 Oct;53(10):1542-51. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12694. Epub 2016 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Women, the heart of intuition, and creation entanglement.女性,直觉与创造纠葛的核心。
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 20;16:1547229. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1547229. eCollection 2025.
9
From the heart: hand over heart as an embodiment of honesty.
Cogn Process. 2014 Aug;15(3):237-44. doi: 10.1007/s10339-014-0606-4. Epub 2014 Mar 13.

本文引用的文献

3
Anger as Seeing Red: Perceptual Sources of Evidence.将愤怒视为“看到红色”:证据的感知来源。
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2011 May;2(3):311-316. doi: 10.1177/1948550610390051. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
4
The big chill: interpersonal coldness and emotion-labeling skills.人际冷漠与情绪标注技巧
J Pers. 2012 Jun;80(3):703-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00738.x. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
7
A metaphor-enriched social cognition.富有隐喻的社会认知。
Psychol Bull. 2010 Nov;136(6):1045-67. doi: 10.1037/a0020970.
9
Quarrelsomeness in daily life.日常生活中的争吵。
J Pers. 2010 Feb;78(1):39-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00608.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验