• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前瞻性、随机对照试验比较了 Plug and Patch 开放式修补术与完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术后的术后疼痛。

Prospective, randomized-controlled trial comparing postoperative pain after plug and patch open repair with totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.

机构信息

Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria,

出版信息

Hernia. 2014 Apr;18(2):237-42. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1123-6. Epub 2013 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-013-1123-6
PMID:23775532
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare postoperative pain between the open tension-free plug and patch (PP) technique and the totally extraperitoneal patch (TEP) hernioplasty.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-four male patients with unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized to undergo PP and TEP from 2005 to 2009. Pain assessment was conducted using the numerical rating scale (NRS) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire preoperatively, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. All patients received the same analgesic regimen and documented pain in a NRS-based 4-week diary.

RESULTS

Of the 154 patients 77 underwent TEP and 77 PP. Median follow-up was 3.8 years. One recurrent hernia was observed in the TEP and two in the PP group (p = 0.56). Median preoperative NRS scores were 2 and 2, 0.3 and 0.4 at 6 months, 0.1 and 0.3 at 12 months, 0.2 and 0.1 at 24 months postoperatively in the PP and TEP groups, respectively (p > 0.05). Data from the 4-week pain diaries revealed significant differences in pain intensity between the two different techniques from the second postoperative week (p < 0.05). Patients in the PP group required more additional analgesics on day four and five postoperatively (p = 0.037 and 0.015, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data favor the TEP technique concerning postoperative pain as primary endpoint between tension-free PP and TEP hernia repair.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较开放式无张力 Plug 和补片(PP)技术与完全腹膜外补片(TEP)疝修补术的术后疼痛。

方法

2005 年至 2009 年,154 例单侧腹股沟疝男性患者随机分为 PP 和 TEP 组。采用数字评分量表(NRS)和麦吉尔疼痛问卷在术前、术后 6、12 和 24 个月进行疼痛评估。所有患者均接受相同的镇痛方案,并在基于 NRS 的 4 周日记中记录疼痛。

结果

154 例患者中,77 例行 TEP,77 例行 PP。中位随访时间为 3.8 年。TEP 组发生 1 例复发疝,PP 组发生 2 例(p = 0.56)。PP 和 TEP 组的中位术前 NRS 评分分别为 2 和 2、0.3 和 0.4 分,术后 6 个月为 0.1 和 0.3 分,12 个月为 0.2 和 0.1 分,24 个月为 0.2 和 0.1 分(p > 0.05)。4 周疼痛日记的数据显示,两种不同技术之间的疼痛强度在术后第二周存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。PP 组患者在术后第 4 天和第 5 天需要更多的额外镇痛药物(p = 0.037 和 0.015)。

结论

我们的数据支持 TEP 技术,因为在术后疼痛方面,它是无张力 PP 和 TEP 疝修补术的主要终点。

相似文献

1
Prospective, randomized-controlled trial comparing postoperative pain after plug and patch open repair with totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.前瞻性、随机对照试验比较了 Plug and Patch 开放式修补术与完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术后的术后疼痛。
Hernia. 2014 Apr;18(2):237-42. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1123-6. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
2
Comparison of the open tension-free mesh-plug, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial.开放式无张力网塞修补术、经腹腹膜前(TAPP)和完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术治疗原发性单侧腹股沟疝的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jan;25(1):234-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1165-0. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
3
The effect of ultrapro or prolene mesh on postoperative pain and well-being following endoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair (TULP): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Ultrapro 或 prolene 网片对内镜完全腹膜外(TEP)疝修补术(TULP)后术后疼痛和舒适度的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 Jun 7;13:76. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-76.
4
Randomized clinical trial of total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty vs Lichtenstein repair: a long-term follow-up study.完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术与Lichtenstein修补术的随机临床试验:一项长期随访研究
Arch Surg. 2012 Mar;147(3):256-60. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.2023.
5
A prospective randomized controlled trial to compare single-port endo-laparoscopic surgery versus conventional TEP inguinal hernia repair.一项比较单孔腹腔镜手术与传统经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Nov;28(11):3053-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3578-7. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
6
A prospective, randomized comparison of long-term outcomes: chronic groin pain and quality of life following totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.一项前瞻性、随机对照比较研究:完全腹膜外(TEP)和经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后慢性腹股沟疼痛和生活质量的长期结局。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul;27(7):2373-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2797-7. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
7
Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach: a prospective randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)途径:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26(3):639-49. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1931-7. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
8
A randomized clinical trial comparing early patient-reported pain after open anterior mesh repair versus totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia.一项比较腹股沟疝开放前路补片修补术与完全腹膜外修补术后早期患者报告疼痛情况的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2021 Dec 1;108(12):1433-1437. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab354.
9
Mesh fixation compared to nonfixation in total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial in a rural center in India.网片固定与非固定在完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的比较:印度农村中心的一项随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Oct;25(10):3300-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1708-z. Epub 2011 May 2.
10
Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial.无张力腹股沟疝修补术:经腹膜前修补术(TEP)与网塞修补术及李金斯坦修补术的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Ann Surg. 2003 Jan;237(1):142-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200301000-00020.

引用本文的文献

1
Sexual dysfunction between laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放式腹股沟疝修补术患者性功能障碍的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jul 14;408(1):277. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03006-z.
2
Varying convalescence recommendations after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic scoping review.不同的腹股沟疝修补术后恢复期建议:系统范围综述。
Hernia. 2022 Aug;26(4):1009-1021. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02629-3. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
3
Primary inguinal hernia: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, totally extraperitoneal, and robotic preperitoneal repair.

本文引用的文献

1
Testicular functions, chronic groin pain, and quality of life after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜和开放式网片修补腹股沟疝后睾丸功能、慢性腹股沟痛和生活质量:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1304-17. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2029-y. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
2
International guidelines for prevention and management of post-operative chronic pain following inguinal hernia surgery.国际腹股沟疝手术后慢性疼痛预防和管理指南。
Hernia. 2011 Jun;15(3):239-49. doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0798-9. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
3
Current opinion on laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia.
原发性腹股沟疝:开放、腹腔镜经腹腹膜前、完全腹膜外和机器人腹膜前修补术的系统评价和贝叶斯网状 Meta 分析比较。
Hernia. 2019 Jun;23(3):473-484. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01964-2. Epub 2019 May 14.
4
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
5
Comparison of Lichtenstein Repair and Mesh Plug Repair Methods in The Treatment of Indirect Inguinal Hernia.李金斯坦修补术与疝环充填式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟斜疝的疗效比较
Cureus. 2018 Jul 6;10(7):e2935. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2935.
腹股沟疝腹腔镜修补术的当前观点
Surg Endosc. 2010 Apr;24(4):974-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0701-2. Epub 2009 Sep 19.
4
European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.欧洲疝学会关于成人腹股沟疝治疗的指南。
Hernia. 2009 Aug;13(4):343-403. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
5
Chronic pain after mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review.腹股沟疝补片修补术后的慢性疼痛:一项系统评价
Am J Surg. 2007 Sep;194(3):394-400. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.02.012.
6
Pain after anterior mesh hernia repair.前路补片疝修补术后疼痛。
J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Jun;200(6):885-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.02.005.
7
Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.比较开放与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的随机临床试验的Meta分析
Br J Surg. 2003 Dec;90(12):1479-92. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4301.
8
Lichtenstein vs anterior preperitoneal prosthetic mesh placement in open inguinal hernia repair: a prospective, randomized trial.利希滕斯坦术式与开放腹股沟疝修补术中前腹膜前假体网片置入术的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验
Hernia. 2004 May;8(2):98-103. doi: 10.1007/s10029-003-0174-5. Epub 2003 Nov 19.
9
Minimally invasive, nonlaparoscopic, preperitoneal, and sutureless, inguinal herniorrhaphy.微创、非腹腔镜、腹膜前及无缝合腹股沟疝修补术
Am J Surg. 1999 Oct;178(4):298-302. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00181-6.
10
Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal-hernia repair.传统前路手术与腹腔镜手术治疗腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1997 May 29;336(22):1541-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199705293362201.