Suppr超能文献

新的周围神经超声测量方法:一种用于诊断麻风病周围神经受累的工具。

New sonographic measures of peripheral nerves: a tool for the diagnosis of peripheral nerve involvement in leprosy.

机构信息

Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Neurologia, Divisão de Dermatologia, Divisão de Radiologia, ,Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.

出版信息

Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2013 May;108(3):257-62. doi: 10.1590/S0074-02762013000300001.

Abstract

To evaluate ultrasonographic (US) cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of peripheral nerves, indexes of the differences between CSAs at the same point (∆CSAs) and between tunnel (T) and pre-tunnel (PT) ulnar CSAs (∆TPTs) in leprosy patients (LPs) and healthy volunteers (HVs). Seventy-seven LPs and 49 HVs underwent bilateral US at PT and T ulnar points, as well as along the median (M) and common fibular (CF) nerves, to calculate the CSAs, ∆CSAs and ∆TPTs. The CSA values in HVs were lower than those in LPs (p < 0.0001) at the PT (5.67/9.78 mm2) and T (6.50/10.94 mm2) points, as well as at the M (5.85/8.48 mm2) and CF (8.17/14.14 mm2) nerves. The optimum CSA- receiver operating characteristic (ROC) points and sensitivities/specificities were, respectively, 6.85 mm2 and 68-85% for the PT point, 7.35 mm2 and 71-78% for the T point, 6.75 mm2 and 62-75% for the M nerve and 9.55 mm2 and 81-72% for the CF nerve. The ∆CSAs of the LPs were greater than those of the HVs at the PT point (4.02/0.85; p = 0.007), T point (3.71/0.98; p = 0.0005) and CF nerve (2.93/1.14; p = 0.015), with no difference found for the M nerve (1.41/0.95; p = 0.17). The optimum ∆CSA-ROC points, sensitivities, specificities and p-values were, respectively, 1.35, 49%, 80% and 0.003 at the PT point, 1.55, 55-85% and 0.0006 at the T point, 0.70, 58-50% and 0.73 for the M nerve and 1.25, 54-67% and 0.022 for the CF nerve. The ∆TPT in the LPs was greater than that in the HVs (4.43/1.44; p <0.0001). The optimum ∆TPT-ROC point was 2.65 (90% sensitivity/41% specificity, p < 0.0001). The ROC analysis of CSAs showed the highest specificity and sensitivity at the PT point and CF nerve, respectively. The PT and T ∆CSAs had high specificities (> 80%) and ∆TPT had the highest specificity (> 90%). New sonographic peripheral nerve measurements (∆CSAs and ∆TPT) provide an important methodological improvement in the detection of leprosy neuropathy.

摘要

为了评估麻风病患者(LPs)和健康志愿者(HV)外周神经的超声(US)横截面积(CSA),以及同一部位(∆CSA)和隧道(T)与隧道前(PT)尺神经 CSA 之间的差异(∆TPT)的指数。77 例 LP 和 49 例 HV 在 PT 和 T 尺神经点以及正中(M)和腓总(CF)神经进行双侧 US,以计算 CSA、∆CSA 和 ∆TPT。HV 的 CSA 值在 PT(5.67/9.78mm2)和 T(6.50/10.94mm2)点以及 M(5.85/8.48mm2)和 CF(8.17/14.14mm2)神经中均低于 LP(p<0.0001)。CSA-ROC 分析的最佳 CSA 值和灵敏度/特异性分别为 6.85mm2 和 68-85%(PT 点)、7.35mm2 和 71-78%(T 点)、6.75mm2 和 62-75%(M 神经)和 9.55mm2 和 81-72%(CF 神经)。LP 的 ∆CSA 大于 HV 在 PT 点(4.02/0.85;p=0.007)、T 点(3.71/0.98;p=0.0005)和 CF 神经(2.93/1.14;p=0.015),而 M 神经没有差异(1.41/0.95;p=0.17)。∆CSA-ROC 分析的最佳 ∆CSA 值、灵敏度、特异性和 p 值分别为 1.35、49%、80%和 0.003(PT 点)、1.55、55-85%和 0.0006(T 点)、0.70、58-50%和 0.73(M 神经)和 1.25、54-67%和 0.022(CF 神经)。LP 的 ∆TPT 大于 HV(4.43/1.44;p<0.0001)。最佳 ∆TPT-ROC 点为 2.65(90%灵敏度/41%特异性,p<0.0001)。CSA 的 ROC 分析显示在 PT 点和 CF 神经处具有最高的特异性和灵敏度。PT 和 T ∆CSA 具有高特异性(>80%),而 ∆TPT 具有最高特异性(>90%)。新的超声外周神经测量(∆CSA 和 ∆TPT)为麻风病神经病变的检测提供了重要的方法学改进。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

8
Stigma, chemoprophylaxis, and leprosy control.耻辱感、化学预防与麻风病防治
Lancet Infect Dis. 2009 Jan;9(1):10. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(08)70293-7.
10
Near nerve potential of sural nerve in leprosy.麻风病中腓肠神经的近神经电位
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2004 Sep;62(3A):571-4. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2004000400001. Epub 2004 Aug 24.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验