Voltan Glauber, Marques-Júnior Wilson, Santana Jaci Maria, Lincoln Silva Claudia Maria, Leite Marcel Nani, De Paula Natália Aparecida, Bernardes Filho Fred, Barreto Josafá Gonçalves, Da Silva Moises Batista, Conde Guilherme, Salgado Claudio Guedes, Frade Marco Andrey Cipriani
Healing and Hansen's Disease Laboratory, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
National Referral Center for Sanitary Dermatology and Hansen's Disease, Dermatology Division, Internal Medicine Department, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 17;9:1059448. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1059448. eCollection 2022.
Hansen's disease (HD) primarily infects peripheral nerves, with patients without HD being free of peripheral nerve damage. Household contacts (HHCs) of patients with HD are at a 5-10 times higher risk of HD than the general population. Neural thickening is one of the three cardinal signs that define a case of HD according to WHO guidelines, exclusively considering palpation examination that is subjective and may not detect the condition in the earliest cases even when performed by well-trained professionals. High-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) can evaluate most peripheral nerves, a validated technique with good reproducibility allowing detailed and accurate examination.
This study aimed to use the peripheral nerve HRUS test according to the HD protocol as a diagnostic method for neuropathy comparing HHCs with healthy volunteers (HVs) and patients with HD.
In municipalities from 14 different areas of Brazil we selected at random 83 HHC of MB-patients to be submitted to peripheral nerve ultrasound and compared to 49 HVs and 176 HD-patients.
Household contacts assessed by HRUS showed higher median and mean absolute peripheral nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) values and greater asymmetries (ΔCSA) compared to HVs at the same points. Median and mean absolute peripheral nerve CSA values were higher in patients with HD compared to HCCs at almost all points, while ΔCSA values were equal at all points. Mean ± SD focality (ΔTpT) values for HHCs and patients with HD, respectively, were 2.7 ± 2.2/2.6 ± 2.2 for the median nerve, 2.9 ± 2.7/3.3 ± 2.9 for the common fibular nerve ( > 0.05), and 1.3 ± 1.3/2.2 ± 3.9 for the ulnar nerve ( < 0.0001).
Considering HRUS findings for HHCs, asymmetric multiple mononeuropathy signs (thickening or asymmetry) in at least 20% of the nerves evaluated could already indicates evidence of HD neuropathy. Thus, if more nerve points are assessed in HHCs (14 instead of 10), the contacts become more like patients with HD according to nerve thickening determined by HRUS, which should be a cutting-edge tool for an early diagnosis of leprosy cases.
麻风病主要感染周围神经,未患麻风病的人无周围神经损伤。麻风病患者的家庭接触者(HHCs)感染麻风病的风险比一般人群高5至10倍。神经增粗是世界卫生组织指南定义麻风病病例的三个主要体征之一,仅考虑触诊检查,这种检查具有主观性,即使由训练有素的专业人员进行,在最早的病例中也可能检测不到病情。高分辨率超声(HRUS)可以评估大多数周围神经,是一种经过验证且具有良好可重复性的技术,能够进行详细准确的检查。
本研究旨在根据麻风病方案使用周围神经HRUS检测作为神经病变的诊断方法,比较HHCs与健康志愿者(HVs)以及麻风病患者。
在巴西14个不同地区的市,我们随机选择83名MB患者的HHCs进行周围神经超声检查,并与49名HVs和176名麻风病患者进行比较。
通过HRUS评估,HHCs在相同部位的中位和平均绝对周围神经横截面积(CSA)值高于HVs,且不对称性(ΔCSA)更大。在几乎所有部位,麻风病患者的中位和平均绝对周围神经CSA值均高于HHCs,而所有部位的ΔCSA值均相等。HHCs和麻风病患者的正中神经平均±标准差局灶性(ΔTpT)值分别为2.7±2.2/2.6±2.2,腓总神经为2.9±2.7/3.3±2.9(>0.05),尺神经为1.3±1.3/2.2±3.9(<0.0001)。
考虑到HHCs的HRUS检查结果,在至少20%的评估神经中出现不对称性多发性单神经病体征(增粗或不对称)可能已表明存在麻风病神经病变证据。因此,如果对HHCs评估更多的神经点(14个而非10个),根据HRUS确定的神经增粗情况,这些接触者更类似于麻风病患者,HRUS应成为麻风病早期诊断的前沿工具。