• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国卫生保健系统中作为典型手术的保留幽门胰头切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的收益比较分析。

Comparative analysis of the revenues of pylorus-preserving pancreatic head resections and laparoscopic cholecystectomies as prototypic surgical procedures in the German health-care system.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstrasse 22, Munich 81675, Germany.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013 Aug;398(6):825-31. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1091-4. Epub 2013 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-013-1091-4
PMID:23778973
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although centralization of complex surgical procedures such as pancreaticoduodenectomies is associated with a reduction in morbidity and mortality rates, it is unclear whether such surgeries are adequately represented in the German disease-related group (DRG) system.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Out of all patients who underwent pancreatic resections (n = 450) at our institution between January 2008 and November 2011, 76 patients who underwent a pylorus-preserving pancreatic head resection due to pancreatic head adenocarcinoma were selected for analysis. The revenues generated by these surgical procedures were compared with those of 144 patients who had undergone elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies for symptomatic gallstone disease between January 2009 and September 2010 in our hospital.

RESULTS

In patients undergoing pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy, revenues per case were 1,585.55 Euros, with an average length of hospital stay (ALOS) of 19.9 days (range 7-55 days) and an average postoperative hospital stay of 16 days; however, if the ALOS was exceeded, expenditures increasingly exceeded returns. Analysis of the cohort of patients with pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomies demonstrated average revenues per day of 79.27 Euros. In contrast, for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which was treated with high surgical standardization and stringent case management, the ALOS was only 2.8 days, producing average revenues of 288.80 Euros per day and total revenues of 817.53 Euros per case.

CONCLUSION

At university hospitals, cost-effective realization of major pancreatic surgery is difficult, while highly standardized surgeries such as laparoscopic cholecystectomies can be performed at a favorable balance. This may be due to, firstly, an underrepresentation of university hospitals in the German DRG calculation basis and, secondly, to a relatively long preoperative hospital stay as a result of extensive diagnostic measures. We consider this kind of preoperative assessment paramount for an academic pancreatic center and thus argue for an increased reimbursement for these procedures.

摘要

背景

尽管胰腺十二指肠切除术等复杂手术的集中化与发病率和死亡率的降低有关,但尚不清楚德国疾病相关分组(DRG)系统是否充分涵盖了这些手术。

患者和方法

在我们医院 2008 年 1 月至 2011 年 11 月期间进行胰腺切除术的所有患者中,选择了 76 例因胰腺头部腺癌而行保留幽门的胰头切除术的患者进行分析。将这些手术产生的收入与我们医院 2009 年 1 月至 2010 年 9 月期间 144 例行择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗有症状胆囊结石病的患者进行比较。

结果

行保留幽门胰十二指肠切除术的患者,每例手术的收入为 1585.55 欧元,平均住院时间(ALOS)为 19.9 天(范围 7-55 天),平均术后住院时间为 16 天;然而,如果 ALOS 超过规定时间,支出将超过收入。对行保留幽门胰十二指肠切除术患者队列的分析表明,每天的平均收入为 79.27 欧元。相比之下,腹腔镜胆囊切除术具有高度标准化和严格的病例管理,ALOS 仅为 2.8 天,每天的平均收入为 288.80 欧元,每例手术的总收入为 817.53 欧元。

结论

在大学附属医院,实现主要胰腺手术的成本效益是困难的,而像腹腔镜胆囊切除术这样高度标准化的手术可以以有利的平衡来进行。这可能是由于首先大学附属医院在德国 DRG 计算基础中的代表性不足,其次由于广泛的诊断措施导致术前住院时间相对较长。我们认为这种术前评估对于学术胰腺中心至关重要,因此主张增加这些手术的报销。

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of the revenues of pylorus-preserving pancreatic head resections and laparoscopic cholecystectomies as prototypic surgical procedures in the German health-care system.德国卫生保健系统中作为典型手术的保留幽门胰头切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的收益比较分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013 Aug;398(6):825-31. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1091-4. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
2
Pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus standard Whipple procedure: a prospective, randomized, multicenter analysis of 170 patients with pancreatic and periampullary tumors.保留幽门的胰十二指肠切除术与标准Whipple手术:170例胰腺和壶腹周围肿瘤患者的前瞻性、随机、多中心分析
Ann Surg. 2004 Nov;240(5):738-45. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000143248.71964.29.
3
Pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head is justified in elderly patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.胰十二指肠切除术治疗老年胰头腺癌是合理的:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2016 Apr;28:118-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.02.064. Epub 2016 Feb 21.
4
The Clavien-Dindo Classification in Pancreatic Surgery: A Clinical and Economic Validation.胰十二指肠切除术的Clavien-Dindo分类:临床与经济学验证
J Invest Surg. 2019 Jun;32(4):314-320. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1420837. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
5
[Cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: does pylorus preservation change morbidity and prognosis?].[胰头十二指肠切除术治疗胰头腺癌:保留幽门是否会改变发病率和预后?]
Ann Chir. 2002 Feb;127(2):95-100. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3944(01)00706-4.
6
Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization.733例胰腺切除术的十年经验:适应证的变化、老年患者及住院时间的缩短
Arch Surg. 2001 Apr;136(4):391-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.4.391.
7
[Insurance costs in pancreatic surgery : does the pecuniary aspect indicate formation of centers?].[胰腺手术中的保险费用:金钱因素是否表明医疗中心的形成?]
Chirurg. 2011 Feb;82(2):154-9. doi: 10.1007/s00104-010-1953-z.
8
The laparoscopic approach to pancreatoduodenectomy is cost neutral in very high-volume centers.腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术在高容量中心是具有成本中性的。
Surgery. 2019 Dec;166(6):1027-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
9
Matched Case-Control Analysis Comparing Laparoscopic and Open Pylorus-preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients With Periampullary Tumors.腹腔镜与开腹保留幽门胰十二指肠切除术治疗壶腹周围肿瘤的配对病例对照分析。
Ann Surg. 2015 Jul;262(1):146-55. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001079.
10
Enucleation in pancreatic surgery: indications, technique, and outcome compared to standard pancreatic resections.胰腺外科中的剜除术:与标准胰腺切除术相比的适应证、技术和结果。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Dec;396(8):1197-203. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0801-z. Epub 2011 May 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma and potential opportunities for improvement.胰头腺癌治疗策略的成本效益及潜在改进机会。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Nov;19(12):3659-67. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2610-1. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
2
Complications nearly double the cost of care after pancreaticoduodenectomy.胰腺十二指肠切除术后并发症使治疗费用增加近一倍。
Am J Surg. 2012 Sep;204(3):332-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.10.019. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
3
Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality.
全国范围内胰十二指肠切除术集中化对医院死亡率的影响。
Br J Surg. 2012 Mar;99(3):404-10. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8664. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
4
Pancreatic cancer, healthcare cost, and loss of productivity: a register-based approach.胰腺癌、医疗保健成本和生产力损失:基于登记的方法。
World J Surg. 2011 Oct;35(10):2298-305. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1208-2.
5
One hundred and seventy-eight consecutive pancreatoduodenectomies without mortality: role of the multidisciplinary approach.178 例连续胰十二指肠切除术无死亡:多学科方法的作用。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2011 Aug;10(4):415-21. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(11)60070-2.
6
Improving outcome for patients with pancreatic cancer through centralization.通过集中化改善胰腺癌患者的预后。
Br J Surg. 2011 Oct;98(10):1455-62. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7581. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
7
Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery.高危手术的医院容量和手术死亡率趋势。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 2;364(22):2128-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1010705.
8
Pancreatic cancer surgery in the new millennium: better prediction of outcome.新世纪的胰腺癌手术:更好的预后预测。
Ann Surg. 2011 Aug;254(2):311-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821fd334.
9
The impact of complications on costs of major surgical procedures: a cost analysis of 1200 patients.并发症对大型手术费用的影响:1200 例患者的成本分析。
Ann Surg. 2011 Dec;254(6):907-13. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821d4a43.
10
Quality improvement of pancreatic surgery by centralization in the western part of the Netherlands.荷兰西部地区胰腺手术的质量改进通过集中化实现。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jul;18(7):1821-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1511-4. Epub 2011 May 5.