• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌淋巴管浸润的预后影响:24 年单中心 1616 例患者的分析。

Prognostic impact of lymphatic invasion of colorectal cancer: a single-center analysis of 1,616 patients over 24 years.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kurume University, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Anticancer Res. 2013 Jul;33(7):2965-70.

PMID:23780987
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The degree of lymph node metastasis represents an important prognostic factor for cancer. Lymphovascular invasion is a traditional tool for estimating the aggressiveness of colorectal cancer.

AIM

To determine correlations between lymphatic invasion and lymph node metastasis or disease stage, and clarify the prognostic impact of lymphatic invasion.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients (N=1,616) who underwent curative resection of primary colorectal adenocarcinoma at the Kurume University Hospital were included. Lymphatic invasion was calculated as an average and the degree was also determined (Ly0-3). Clinicopathological factors including lymphatic invasion were assessed by uni- and multivariate analyses to determine factors affecting survival. Survival was compared between different degrees of lymphatic invasion and lymph node metastasis.

RESULTS

Lymphatic invasion was absent (Ly0) in 806 patients (50%), and lymph node metastasis was absent (N0) in 1,085 patients (67%). Ninety-one percent of N0 patients were Ly0-1, 72% of N1 were Ly0-1, and 54% of N2 were Ly2-3. All patients with stage 0 disease (100%) were Ly0, 95% of stage I were Ly0-1, 46% of stage II were Ly1-2, and 36% of stage III were Ly2-3. Five- and 10-year survival rates were 83% and 68% in Ly0, 73% and 56% in Ly1, 66% and 49% in Ly2, 63% and 48% in Ly3, 81% and 67% in N0, 69% and 57% in N1, and 60% and 52% in N2, respectively (p<0.0001 each).

CONCLUSION

Lymphatic invasion in colorectal cancer correlates well with the status of lymph node metastasis and disease stage, representing an independent prognostic factor after curative resection. Lymphatic invasion can be used for evaluating tumor aggressiveness and estimating patient survival, irrespective of the actual number of positive lymph nodes found.

摘要

背景

淋巴结转移程度是癌症的一个重要预后因素。淋巴管浸润是评估结直肠癌侵袭性的传统工具。

目的

确定淋巴管浸润与淋巴结转移或疾病分期之间的相关性,并阐明淋巴管浸润的预后影响。

患者和方法

纳入在久留米大学医院接受原发性结直肠腺癌根治性切除术的患者(N=1616)。淋巴管浸润程度计算为平均值,并确定程度(Ly0-3)。通过单因素和多因素分析评估包括淋巴管浸润在内的临床病理因素,以确定影响生存的因素。比较不同淋巴管浸润程度和淋巴结转移患者的生存情况。

结果

806 例患者(50%)淋巴管浸润缺失(Ly0),1085 例患者(67%)淋巴结转移缺失(N0)。91%的 N0 患者 Ly0-1,72%的 N1 患者 Ly0-1,54%的 N2 患者 Ly2-3。所有 0 期疾病患者(100%)均为 Ly0,I 期患者 95%为 Ly0-1,II 期患者 46%为 Ly1-2,III 期患者 36%为 Ly2-3。Ly0 的 5 年和 10 年生存率分别为 83%和 68%,Ly1 为 73%和 56%,Ly2 为 66%和 49%,Ly3 为 63%和 48%,N0 为 81%和 67%,N1 为 69%和 57%,N2 为 60%和 52%(均<0.0001)。

结论

结直肠癌的淋巴管浸润与淋巴结转移和疾病分期密切相关,是根治性切除术后的独立预后因素。淋巴管浸润可用于评估肿瘤侵袭性和估计患者生存情况,而与实际检出的阳性淋巴结数量无关。

相似文献

1
Prognostic impact of lymphatic invasion of colorectal cancer: a single-center analysis of 1,616 patients over 24 years.结直肠癌淋巴管浸润的预后影响:24 年单中心 1616 例患者的分析。
Anticancer Res. 2013 Jul;33(7):2965-70.
2
Tumor invasion of lymph node capsules in patients with Dukes C colorectal adenocarcinoma.Dukes C期结肠腺癌患者的肿瘤对淋巴结被膜的侵犯
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Dec;49(12):1867-77. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0733-9.
3
[Lymphatic permeation of colorectal cancer--evaluation as a prognostic factor by prospective studies].[结直肠癌的淋巴管浸润——前瞻性研究对其作为预后因素的评估]
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1991 Dec;92(12):1686-93.
4
Estimation of the number of metastatic lymph nodes in dukes' C colorectal cancer.估计 Dukes' C 期结直肠癌的转移淋巴结数量。
Anticancer Res. 2013 Jul;33(7):2949-55.
5
Vascular invasion, but not lymphatic invasion, of the primary tumor is a strong prognostic factor in patients with colorectal cancer.原发性肿瘤的血管侵犯,但无淋巴管侵犯,是结直肠癌患者的一个强有力的预后因素。
Anticancer Res. 2014 Jun;34(6):3147-51.
6
Metastatic potential in T1 and T2 colorectal cancer.T1和T2期结直肠癌的转移潜能
Hepatogastroenterology. 2005 Nov-Dec;52(66):1688-91.
7
Mismatch repair system and p53 expression in patients with T1 and T2 colorectal cancer: predictive role of lymph node metastasis and survival.T1 和 T2 结直肠癌患者错配修复系统和 p53 表达:淋巴结转移和生存的预测作用。
J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jun;109(8):848-52. doi: 10.1002/jso.23592. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
8
Resection with en bloc removal of regional lymph node after endoscopic resection for T1 colorectal cancer.内镜切除 T1 结直肠癌后整块切除区域淋巴结。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(13):4161-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2471-7. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
9
Tumor deposit is a poor prognostic indicator for patients who have stage II and III colorectal cancer with fewer than 4 lymph node metastases but not for those with 4 or more.肿瘤沉积是 II 期和 III 期结直肠癌患者(转移淋巴结少于 4 个,但多于 4 个)的预后不良指标。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Apr;57(4):467-74. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000059.
10
Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage III colorectal cancer.淋巴结比率在 III 期结直肠癌中的预后价值。
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Oct;13(10):1116-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02435.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Indocyanine Green Near-Infrared Fluorescence-Guided Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Colon Cancer.吲哚菁绿近红外荧光引导下的结肠癌前哨淋巴结活检
Biomedicines. 2025 Apr 8;13(4):902. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13040902.
2
Prognostic significance of perioperative circulating CD56 NK cell and recovery of NK cell activity in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing radical surgery.接受根治性手术的结直肠癌患者围手术期循环CD56自然杀伤细胞及自然杀伤细胞活性恢复的预后意义
Transl Oncol. 2025 Feb;52:102198. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102198. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
3
Lymphovascular invasion in colorectal cancers: can we predict it preoperatively?
结直肠癌中的淋巴管浸润:我们能否在术前对其进行预测?
Ann Coloproctol. 2024 Jun;40(3):245-252. doi: 10.3393/ac.2023.00458.0065. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
4
Association of future cancer metastases with fibroblast activation protein-α: a systematic review and meta-analysis.未来癌症转移与成纤维细胞活化蛋白-α的关联:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2024 May 1;14:1339050. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1339050. eCollection 2024.
5
Enterotypical Prevotella and three novel bacterial biomarkers in preoperative stool predict the clinical outcome of colorectal cancer.术前粪便中的典型普雷沃菌和三种新型细菌生物标志物可预测结直肠癌的临床结局。
Microbiome. 2022 Nov 28;10(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01388-8.
6
Recurrence-Free Survival Outcomes Based on Novel Classification Combining Lymphovascular Invasion, Perineural Invasion, and T4 Status in Stage II-III Colon Cancer.基于将淋巴管侵犯、神经周围侵犯和T4状态相结合的新型分类的II-III期结肠癌无复发生存结果
Cancer Manag Res. 2022 Jun 20;14:2031-2040. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S358939. eCollection 2022.
7
A competing risk analysis of colorectal cancer recurrence after curative surgery.根治性手术后结直肠癌复发的竞争风险分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Mar 3;22(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02161-9.
8
Prognostic impact of count of extratumoral lymphatic permeation in lung adenocarcinoma and its relation to the immune microenvironment.肺腺癌中外周淋巴管浸润计数的预后影响及其与免疫微环境的关系。
Cancer Sci. 2022 Apr;113(4):1497-1506. doi: 10.1111/cas.15267. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
9
Mechanisms and Clinical Significance of Tumor Lymphatic Invasion.肿瘤淋巴管侵犯的机制及临床意义。
Cells. 2021 Sep 29;10(10):2585. doi: 10.3390/cells10102585.
10
Mismeasured Covariate in the Long-Term Survival of Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌长期生存中协变量测量错误
Galen Med J. 2019 Jul 8;8:e1413. doi: 10.22086/gmj.v8i0.1413. eCollection 2019.