Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine. Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine. Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Anticancer Res. 2014 Jun;34(6):3147-51.
We previously showed that the presence of vascular invasion, but not lymphatic invasion, was a strong prognostic factor for breast cancer. Lymphatic invasion may represent mainly the selective affinity of cancer cells for lymph nodes. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the presence of vascular invasion that may reflect systemic disease as a predictor of disease recurrence in colorectal cancer, separate from lymphatic invasion of the primary tumor.
We retrospectively evaluated the cases of 177 consecutive patients with primary colorectal cancer who underwent colorectal resection. We examined the relationship between recurrence and the prognostic significance of clinicopathological factors, particularly lymphatic and vascular invasion.
The presence of vascular invasion (v) was significant, while that of lymphatic invasion (ly) was not significant in univariate analysis. The presence of vascular invasion was an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. Among the 60 patients in the ly-/v- group, one (1.7%) had disease recurrence, and among the 33 patients in the ly+/v- group, one (3.0%) had disease recurrence. On the other hand, among the 71 patients in the ly+/v+ group, 16 patients (22.5%) suffered recurrence, and among the 13 patients in the ly-/v+ group, four (30.8%) suffered recurrence. It is interesting to note that despite the presence of lymphatic invasion, the group without vascular invasion (ly+/v-) had a few patients with distant metastases, a result which is similar to that of the ly-/v- group.
The presence of vascular invasion, but not lymphatic invasion, could be an indicator of high biological aggressiveness and may be a strong prognostic factor for colorectal cancer.
我们之前的研究表明,血管侵犯的存在而不是淋巴管侵犯的存在是乳腺癌的一个强烈的预后因素。淋巴管侵犯可能主要代表癌细胞对淋巴结的选择性亲和力。本研究旨在评估血管侵犯的存在,其可能反映全身性疾病作为结直肠癌疾病复发的预测因素,与原发性肿瘤的淋巴管侵犯分开。
我们回顾性评估了 177 例连续接受结直肠切除术的原发性结直肠癌患者的病例。我们检查了复发与临床病理因素(特别是淋巴管和血管侵犯)之间的关系。
血管侵犯(v)的存在具有显著意义,而淋巴管侵犯(ly)的存在则无显著意义。在多变量分析中,血管侵犯的存在是独立的预后因素。在 ly-/v-组的 60 例患者中,有 1 例(1.7%)发生疾病复发,在 ly+/v-组的 33 例患者中,有 1 例(3.0%)发生疾病复发。另一方面,在 ly+/v+组的 71 例患者中,有 16 例(22.5%)发生疾病复发,在 ly-/v+组的 13 例患者中,有 4 例(30.8%)发生疾病复发。有趣的是,尽管存在淋巴管侵犯,但没有血管侵犯(ly+/v-)的患者发生远处转移的情况较少,这一结果与 ly-/v-组相似。
血管侵犯的存在而不是淋巴管侵犯的存在可能是高生物学侵袭性的指标,并且可能是结直肠癌的一个强烈的预后因素。