• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢食减速饮食习惯:自助餐厅员工和教师对通过健康学校赢取胜利的看法。

Go Slow Whoa meal patterns: cafeteria staff and teacher perceptions of effectiveness in winning with wellness schools.

机构信息

Department of Community and Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, P.O. Box 70674, Johnson City, TN 37614, USA.

出版信息

J Sch Health. 2013 Jul;83(7):485-92. doi: 10.1111/josh.12056.

DOI:10.1111/josh.12056
PMID:23782091
Abstract

BACKGROUND

School-based interventions hold promise for child obesity prevention. Implemented as a part of the Winning With Wellness obesity prevention project, the "Go Slow Whoa" meal pattern (GSW) was designed to promote healthier foods in school cafeterias. This investigation determined perceived program effectiveness and impact on student's food purchases.

METHODS

A mixed method design was used, including focus groups with cafeteria staff (CS), quantitative analysis of CS and teacher surveys, and pre-post analysis of cafeteria sales. A total of 37 CS and 131 teachers from 7 schools in northeast Tennessee participated.

RESULTS

CS recognized the important role of school nutrition services in influencing student choices, yet perceived lack of administrative support for cafeteria-based interventions and minimal interaction with teachers were barriers. CS also believed that students choose less nutritious options due to family influence. Cafeteria sales indicated that changes were made in menu planning and production, yet students' choices improved minimally. Teachers expressed moderate levels of confidence in GSW as influential in children's dietary habits.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful implementation of school-based nutrition programs requires supportive policies, administrators, and teachers. CS should be included in program implementation efforts and the role of school nutrition services should be maximized.

摘要

背景

基于学校的干预措施有望预防儿童肥胖。作为“健康赢未来”肥胖预防项目的一部分,“慢下来”膳食模式(GSW)旨在促进学校自助餐厅提供更健康的食物。本研究旨在确定该项目的感知效果及其对学生食物购买的影响。

方法

采用混合方法设计,包括与自助餐厅工作人员(CS)进行焦点小组讨论、对 CS 和教师进行定量分析以及对自助餐厅销售情况进行前后分析。田纳西州东北部的 7 所学校共有 37 名 CS 和 131 名教师参与了研究。

结果

CS 认识到学校营养服务在影响学生选择方面的重要作用,但他们认为缺乏行政支持、与教师的互动有限是障碍。CS 还认为,由于家庭的影响,学生选择了营养成分较低的食物。自助餐厅销售数据表明,菜单规划和生产方面发生了变化,但学生的选择变化不大。教师对 GSW 作为影响儿童饮食习惯的因素表示出中等程度的信心。

结论

成功实施基于学校的营养计划需要得到支持性政策、管理人员和教师的支持。应让 CS 参与到项目实施工作中,并最大限度地发挥学校营养服务的作用。

相似文献

1
Go Slow Whoa meal patterns: cafeteria staff and teacher perceptions of effectiveness in winning with wellness schools.慢食减速饮食习惯:自助餐厅员工和教师对通过健康学校赢取胜利的看法。
J Sch Health. 2013 Jul;83(7):485-92. doi: 10.1111/josh.12056.
2
Promotions to increase lower-fat food choices among students in secondary schools: description and outcomes of TACOS (Trying Alternative Cafeteria Options in Schools).在中学推广增加低脂食品选择:学校尝试替代食堂选择(TACOS)的描述与结果
Public Health Nutr. 2004 Aug;7(5):665-74. doi: 10.1079/PHN2003594.
3
Effect of the Strong4Life School Nutrition Program on Cafeterias and on Manager and Staff Member Knowledge and Practice, Georgia, 2015.2015年,佐治亚州“健康一生学校营养计划”对学校自助餐厅以及管理人员和工作人员知识与实践的影响
Public Health Rep. 2017 Nov/Dec;132(2_suppl):48S-56S. doi: 10.1177/0033354917723332.
4
Effects of changes in lunch-time competitive foods, nutrition practices, and nutrition policies on low-income middle-school children's diets.午餐时间竞争性食品、营养实践及营养政策的变化对低收入初中学生饮食的影响。
Child Obes. 2013 Dec;9(6):509-23. doi: 10.1089/chi.2013.0052. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
5
Effect of food service nutrition improvements on elementary school cafeteria lunch purchase patterns.食品服务营养改善对小学自助餐厅午餐购买模式的影响。
J Sch Health. 2014 Jun;84(6):355-62. doi: 10.1111/josh.12157.
6
The diamond level health promoting schools (DLHPS) program for reduced child obesity in Thailand: lessons learned from interviews and focus groups.泰国旨在减少儿童肥胖的钻石级健康促进学校(DLHPS)项目:访谈和焦点小组的经验教训
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2014;23(2):293-300. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.2014.23.2.17.
7
A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a School Wellness Initiative: An Examination of Longer Lunch Periods and More Physical Activity Opportunities.一项学校健康计划的混合方法评估:对延长午餐时间和增加体育活动机会的考察。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Oct;121(10):1961-1974. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2021.03.010. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
8
Developing a coordinated school health approach to child obesity prevention in rural Appalachia: results of focus groups with teachers, parents, and students.制定协调一致的学校健康方法以预防阿巴拉契亚农村地区儿童肥胖:与教师、家长和学生进行焦点小组讨论的结果
Rural Remote Health. 2009 Oct-Dec;9(4):1157. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
9
Comparison of Researcher-Led versus Teacher-Led effectiveness and fidelity: A Hybrid Type 1 study of Kids SIPsmartER in Appalachia middle schools.研究者主导与教师主导的效果和忠实度比较:阿巴拉契亚中学 Kids SIPsmartER 的混合 1 型研究。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Oct 6;14(10):578-587. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibae041.
10
Implementing School-Based Policies to Prevent Obesity: Cluster Randomized Trial.实施基于学校的政策预防肥胖:集群随机试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Jan;56(1):e1-e11. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.08.026.

引用本文的文献

1
Support for a Weight-Inclusive Curriculum? Exploring Partner Perspectives and Influences on Nutrition Education in Vermont High Schools.支持体重包容课程?探索佛蒙特州高中合作伙伴对营养教育的看法及影响。
J Sch Health. 2025 Jan;95(1):17-25. doi: 10.1111/josh.13510. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
2
School Nutrition Environment and Services: Policies and Practices That Promote Healthy Eating Among K-12 Students.学校营养环境与服务:促进 K-12 学生健康饮食的政策和实践。
J Sch Health. 2023 Sep;93(9):762-777. doi: 10.1111/josh.13365.
3
Teachers' Resources to Support School Lunch: Professional Development Is Warranted.
支持学校午餐的教师资源:专业发展是必要的。
Nutrients. 2022 Nov 1;14(21):4596. doi: 10.3390/nu14214596.
4
Barriers to Healthy Eating Among High School Youth in Rural Southern Appalachia.美国阿巴拉契亚山脉南部农村地区高中生健康饮食的障碍
J Appalach Health. 2019 Jul 6;1(2):31-43. doi: 10.13023/jah.0102.04. eCollection 2019.
5
Exploring primary school years interactions around child weight: A qualitative meta-synthesis of school staff, parent, and child views and experiences.探讨小学阶段围绕儿童体重的互动:对学校工作人员、家长和儿童的观点和经验的定性元分析。
Obes Rev. 2022 Aug;23(8):e13451. doi: 10.1111/obr.13451. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
6
A systematic review of school health policy measurement tools: implementation determinants and outcomes.学校卫生政策测量工具的系统评价:实施决定因素与结果
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jun 26;2(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00169-y.
7
Evaluating the implementation of the SWITCH® school wellness intervention and capacity-building process through multiple methods.通过多种方法评估 SWITCH® 学校健康干预和能力建设过程的实施情况。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Dec 11;17(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01070-y.
8
Assessing the Relationship between District and State Policies and School Nutrition Promotion-Related Practices in the United States.评估美国地区和州政策与学校营养推广相关实践之间的关系。
Nutrients. 2020 Aug 7;12(8):2356. doi: 10.3390/nu12082356.
9
Examining Second Graders' Healthy Food Choices: Through Literacy and Active Learning.审视二年级学生的健康食物选择:通过读写能力与主动学习
Nutr Metab Insights. 2019 May 3;12:1178638819839063. doi: 10.1177/1178638819839063. eCollection 2019.
10
The perception of school food-service professionals on the implementation of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010: a mixed-methods study.2010 年《健康无饥饿儿童法案》实施过程中学校餐饮服务专业人员的看法:一项混合方法研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Aug;22(11):1960-1970. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019001174. Epub 2019 Apr 23.