• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生对药物个体化治疗的理解:一项定性访谈研究。

Doctors' understanding of individualisation of drug treatments: a qualitative interview study.

机构信息

University of Exeter Medical School, Institute of Health Services Research, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2013 May 28;3(5):e002706. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002706.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002706
PMID:23793685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3657639/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore doctors' understanding of individualisation of drug treatments, and identify the methods used to achieve individualisation.

DESIGN

In this exploratory study, we used in-depth qualitative interviews with doctors to gain insight into their understanding of the term 'individualised treatments' and the methods that they use to achieve it.

PARTICIPANTS

16 general practitioners in 6 rural and 10 urban practices, 2 geriatricians and 2 clinical academics were recruited.

SETTING

Primary and secondary care in South West of England.

RESULTS

Understanding of individualisation varied between doctors, and their initial descriptions of individualisation were not always consistent with subsequent examples of the patients they had treated. Understandings of, and methods used to achieve, individualised treatment were frequently discussed in relation to making drug treatment decisions. Few doctors spoke of using strategies to support patients to individualise their own treatments after the consultation.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite its widespread use, variation in doctors' understanding of the term individualisation highlights the need for it to be defined. Efforts are needed to develop effective methods that would offer a structured approach to support patients to manage their treatments after consultations.

摘要

目的

探讨医生对药物个体化治疗的理解,并确定实现个体化治疗的方法。

设计

在这项探索性研究中,我们对医生进行了深入的定性访谈,以深入了解他们对“个体化治疗”一词的理解,以及他们用来实现个体化治疗的方法。

参与者

在 6 家农村和 10 家城市诊所招募了 16 名全科医生、2 名老年病医生和 2 名临床学者。

地点

英格兰西南部的初级和二级保健。

结果

医生对个体化的理解存在差异,他们对个体化的最初描述并不总是与随后对他们治疗过的患者的例子一致。对个体化治疗的理解和实现个体化治疗的方法经常在制定药物治疗决策时进行讨论。很少有医生提到在咨询后使用策略来支持患者个体化他们自己的治疗。

结论

尽管个体化治疗被广泛应用,但医生对该术语的理解存在差异,这突出了需要对其进行定义的必要性。需要努力开发有效的方法,为患者在咨询后管理治疗提供结构化的方法。

相似文献

1
Doctors' understanding of individualisation of drug treatments: a qualitative interview study.医生对药物个体化治疗的理解:一项定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 May 28;3(5):e002706. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002706.
2
How do workplaces, working practices and colleagues affect UK doctors' career decisions? A qualitative study of junior doctors' career decision making in the UK.工作场所、工作实践和同事如何影响英国医生的职业决策?英国初级医生职业决策的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 25;7(10):e018462. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018462.
3
Doctors' engagements with patient experience surveys in primary and secondary care: a qualitative study.医生在初级和二级医疗保健中参与患者体验调查:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2017 Jun;20(3):385-394. doi: 10.1111/hex.12465. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
4
Patients' and doctors' views on depression severity questionnaires incentivised in UK quality and outcomes framework: qualitative study.英国质量与结果框架中激励使用的抑郁症严重程度问卷的患者与医生观点:定性研究
BMJ. 2009 Mar 19;338:b663. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b663.
5
Blood tests in primary care: A qualitative study of communication and decision-making between doctors and patients.基层医疗中的血液检测:医生与患者间沟通和决策的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2453-2461. doi: 10.1111/hex.13564. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
6
Consultations in general practice: a comparison of patients' and doctors' satisfaction.全科医疗中的会诊:患者与医生满意度的比较
BMJ. 1989 Oct 21;299(6706):1015-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6706.1015.
7
Doctors' Attitudes to Patient Question Asking, Patient-Generated Question Lists, and Question Prompt Lists: A Qualitative Study.医生对患者提问、患者生成的问题清单及问题提示清单的态度:一项定性研究
Med Decis Making. 2022 Apr;42(3):283-292. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211029579. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
8
Building a sustainable rural physician workforce.建设可持续的农村医师队伍。
Med J Aust. 2021 Jul;215 Suppl 1:S5-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51122.
9
The politics and ethics of hospital infection prevention and control: a qualitative case study of senior clinicians' perceptions of professional and cultural factors that influence doctors' attitudes and practices in a large Australian hospital.医院感染预防与控制的政策与伦理:一项定性案例研究,调查资深临床医生对影响医生在大型澳大利亚医院的态度和实践的专业和文化因素的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 2;19(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4044-y.
10
Exploring senior doctors' beliefs and attitudes regarding mental illness within the medical profession: a qualitative study.探索医学专业中资深医生对精神疾病的看法和态度:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 16;6(9):e012598. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012598.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial and ethnic minority patient participation in N-of-1 trials: perspectives of healthcare providers and patients.种族和民族少数群体患者参与 N-of-1 试验:医疗保健提供者和患者的观点。
Per Med. 2021 Jul;18(4):347-359. doi: 10.2217/pme-2020-0166. Epub 2021 May 28.
2
Enhancing intrinsic motivation for physical activity among adolescents with cystic fibrosis: a qualitative study of the views of healthcare professionals.提高青少年囊性纤维化患者进行身体活动的内在动机:医疗保健专业人员观点的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 14;9(6):e028996. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-028996.
3
Individualized Integrative Cancer Care in Anthroposophic Medicine: A Qualitative Study of the Concepts and Procedures of Expert Doctors.人智医学中的个体化综合癌症护理:对专家医生概念与程序的定性研究
Integr Cancer Ther. 2016 Dec;15(4):478-494. doi: 10.1177/1534735416640091. Epub 2016 May 4.
4
We need to talk about purpose: a critical interpretive synthesis of health and social care professionals' approaches to self-management support for people with long-term conditions.我们需要探讨目的:对健康与社会护理专业人员为长期疾病患者提供自我管理支持的方法进行批判性诠释性综合分析。
Health Expect. 2017 Apr;20(2):243-259. doi: 10.1111/hex.12453. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
5
We need more guidance on shared decision making.我们需要更多关于共同决策的指导。
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Dec;65(641):663-4. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X688045.
6
Supporting the self-management of hypertension: Patients' experiences of using a mobile phone-based system.支持高血压自我管理:患者使用基于手机系统的体验。
J Hum Hypertens. 2016 Feb;30(2):141-6. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2015.37. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
7
Individualisation of drug treatments for patients with long-term conditions: a review of concepts.长期病症患者药物治疗的个体化:概念综述
BMJ Open. 2014 Mar 26;4(3):e004172. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004172.

本文引用的文献

1
Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations.为医疗服务提供者提供的干预措施,以促进临床会诊中以患者为中心的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD003267. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003267.pub2.
2
GPs' considerations in multimorbidity management: a qualitative study.全科医生在多重疾病管理中的考虑因素:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Jul;62(600):e503-10. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X652373.
3
Courteous but not curious: how doctors' politeness masks their existential neglect. A qualitative study of video-recorded patient consultations.彬彬有礼而非好奇:医生的礼貌如何掩盖其对患者存在的忽视。一项对视频记录的医患访谈的定性研究。
J Med Ethics. 2011 Nov;37(11):650-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.041988. Epub 2011 May 24.
4
Shared decision making: trade-offs between narrower and broader conceptions.共同决策:狭义和广义概念之间的权衡。
Health Expect. 2011 Jun;14(2):210-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00694.x.
5
Supporting patients to make the best decisions.帮助患者做出最佳决策。
BMJ. 2011 Apr 7;342:d2117. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2117.
6
Shared decision making or paternalism in nursing consultations? A qualitative study of primary care asthma nurses' views on sharing decisions with patients regarding inhaler device selection.护理咨询中的共同决策还是家长式作风?对初级保健哮喘护士在与患者就吸入器设备选择方面共享决策的看法的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2011 Dec;14(4):374-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00653.x. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
7
Primary care clinicians' experiences with treatment decision making for older persons with multiple conditions.基层医疗临床医生针对患有多种疾病的老年人进行治疗决策的经历。
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jan 10;171(1):75-80. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.318. Epub 2010 Sep 13.
8
Whatever suits you: unpicking personalization for the NHS.随心所欲:为国民保健制度拆解个性化医疗。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Apr;16(2):310-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01390.x.
9
Shared decision making, paternalism and patient choice.共同决策、家长主义与患者选择。
Health Care Anal. 2010 Mar;18(1):60-84. doi: 10.1007/s10728-008-0108-6. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
10
'Rules of thumb' or reflective practice? Understanding senior physicians' decision-making about anti-thrombotic usage in atrial fibrillation.经验法则还是反思性实践?理解老年医师关于心房颤动抗栓治疗用药的决策过程
QJM. 2007 May;100(5):263-9. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcm016. Epub 2007 Mar 27.