• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以限定日剂量衡量抗生素使用的药物安全事件风险。

Risk of medication safety incidents with antibiotic use measured by defined daily doses.

机构信息

King's College London, King's Health Partners, Pharmaceutical Science Clinical Academic Group, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford St, London, SE1 9NH, UK,

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Oct;35(5):772-9. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9805-9. Epub 2013 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1007/s11096-013-9805-9
PMID:23794077
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medication incidents (MIs) account for 11.3 % of all reported patient-safety incidents in England and Wales. Approximately one-third of inpatients are prescribed an antibiotic at some point during their hospital stay. The WHO has identified incident reporting as one solution to reduce the recurrence of adverse incidents.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the number and nature of reported antibiotic-associated MIs occurring in inpatients and to use defined daily doses (DDDs) to calculate the incident rate for the antibiotics most commonly associated with MIs at each hospital.

SETTING

Two UK acute NHS teaching hospitals.

METHODS

Retrospective quantitative analysis was performed on antibiotic-associated MIs reported to the risk management system over a 2-year period. Quality-assurance measures were undertaken before analysis. The study was approved by the clinical audit departments at both hospitals. Drug consumption data from each hospital were used to calculate the DDD for each antibiotic.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The number of antibiotic-related MIs reported and the incident rate for the 10 antibiotics most commonly associated with MIs at each hospital.

RESULTS

Healthcare staff submitted 6,756 reports, of which 885 (13.1 %) included antibiotics. This resulted in a total of 959 MIs. Most MIs occurred during prescribing (42.4 %, n = 407) and administration (40.0 %, n = 384) stages. Most common types of MIs were omission/delay (26.3 %, n = 252), and dose/frequency (17.9 %, n = 172). Penicillins (34.5 %, n = 331) and aminoglycosides (16.6 %, n = 159) were the most frequently reported groups with co-amoxiclav (16.8 %, n = 161) and gentamicin (14.1 %, n = 135) the most frequently reported drugs. Using DDDs to assess the incident rate showed that cefotaxime (105.4/10,000 DDDs), gentamicin (25.7/10,000 DDDs) and vancomycin (23.7/10,000 DDDs) had the highest rates.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights that detailed analysis of data from reports is essential in understanding MIs and developing strategies to prevent their recurrence. Using DDDs in the analysis of MIs allowed determination of an incident rate providing more useful information than the absolute numbers alone. It also highlighted the disproportionate risk associated with less commonly prescribed antibiotics not identified using MI reporting rates alone.

摘要

背景

在英格兰和威尔士,药物事件(MIs)占所有报告的患者安全事件的 11.3%。大约三分之一的住院患者在住院期间的某个时候被开了抗生素。世界卫生组织已将事件报告确定为减少不良事件复发的解决方案之一。

目的

本研究旨在确定报告的与抗生素相关的 MIs 在住院患者中发生的数量和性质,并使用定义日剂量(DDD)来计算每家医院最常与 MIs 相关的抗生素的发生率。

设置

英国两家急性 NHS 教学医院。

方法

对风险管理系统报告的两年期间与抗生素相关的 MIs 进行回顾性定量分析。在分析之前进行了质量保证措施。该研究得到了两家医院临床审计部门的批准。从每家医院使用药物使用数据计算每种抗生素的 DDD。

主要观察指标

报告的抗生素相关 MIs 的数量以及每家医院最常与 MIs 相关的 10 种抗生素的发生率。

结果

医护人员提交了 6756 份报告,其中 885 份(13.1%)包含抗生素。这导致了总共 959 例 MIs。大多数 MIs 发生在开处方(42.4%,n=407)和给药(40.0%,n=384)阶段。最常见的 MIs 类型是遗漏/延迟(26.3%,n=252)和剂量/频率(17.9%,n=172)。青霉素(34.5%,n=331)和氨基糖苷类(16.6%,n=159)是最常报告的组,其中复方阿莫西林(16.8%,n=161)和庆大霉素(14.1%,n=135)是最常报告的药物。使用 DDD 评估发生率表明,头孢噻肟(105.4/10000 DDD)、庆大霉素(25.7/10000 DDD)和万古霉素(23.7/10000 DDD)的发生率最高。

结论

本研究表明,详细分析报告中的数据对于了解 MIs 并制定预防其复发的策略至关重要。在分析 MIs 时使用 DDD 可以确定发生率,提供比仅使用绝对数字更有用的信息。它还突出了单独使用 MI 报告率未识别的使用频率较低的抗生素相关的不成比例的风险。

相似文献

1
Risk of medication safety incidents with antibiotic use measured by defined daily doses.以限定日剂量衡量抗生素使用的药物安全事件风险。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Oct;35(5):772-9. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9805-9. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
2
Effects of patient-, environment- and medication-related factors on high-alert medication incidents.患者、环境及药物相关因素对高警示药品不良事件的影响。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Jun;26(3):308-20. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu037. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
3
Retrospective analysis of medication incidents reported using an on-line reporting system.对使用在线报告系统报告的用药事件进行回顾性分析。
Pharm World Sci. 2006 Dec;28(6):359-65. doi: 10.1007/s11096-006-9040-8. Epub 2006 Nov 21.
4
Magnitude of error: a review of wrong dose medication incidents reported to a UK hospital voluntary incident reporting system.错误幅度:对英国一家医院自愿事件报告系统报告的错误剂量用药事件的回顾。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Sep;28(5):260-265. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-001987. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
5
Analysis of the nature and contributory factors of medication safety incidents following hospital discharge using National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) data from England and Wales: a multi-method study.利用来自英格兰和威尔士的国家报告与学习系统(NRLS)数据对出院后用药安全事件的性质和促成因素进行分析:一项多方法研究。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2023 Mar 16;14:20420986231154365. doi: 10.1177/20420986231154365. eCollection 2023.
6
What are incident reports telling us? A comparative study at two Australian hospitals of medication errors identified at audit, detected by staff and reported to an incident system.事件报告告诉了我们什么?对澳大利亚两家医院进行的一项比较研究,该研究涉及在审计中发现、由工作人员检测到并报告给事件系统的用药错误。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Feb;27(1):1-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu098. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
7
Rates and types of events reported to established incident reporting systems in two US hospitals.向美国两家医院的既定事件报告系统报告的事件发生率及类型。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Jun;16(3):164-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019901.
8
Antibiotic Prescribing among Pediatric Inpatients with Potential Infections in Two Private Sector Hospitals in Central India.印度中部两家私立医院中潜在感染的儿科住院患者的抗生素处方情况
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 5;10(11):e0142317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142317. eCollection 2015.
9
Medication incidents reported to an online incident reporting system.向在线不良事件报告系统报告的药物不良事件。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 May;67(5):527-32. doi: 10.1007/s00228-010-0986-z. Epub 2011 Jan 15.
10
Can Patient Safety Incident Reports Be Used to Compare Hospital Safety? Results from a Quantitative Analysis of the English National Reporting and Learning System Data.患者安全事件报告能否用于比较医院安全性?对英国国家报告与学习系统数据的定量分析结果
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 9;10(12):e0144107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144107. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring two distinct gentamicin prescribing protocols in UK hospitals: a mixed-methods realist evaluation.探索英国医院中两种不同的庆大霉素处方方案:混合方法现实主义评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 23;11(12):e052697. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052697.
2
Magnitude of error: a review of wrong dose medication incidents reported to a UK hospital voluntary incident reporting system.错误幅度:对英国一家医院自愿事件报告系统报告的错误剂量用药事件的回顾。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Sep;28(5):260-265. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-001987. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
3
Antibiotic-associated suspected adverse drug reactions among hospitalized patients in Uganda: a prospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Mapping the limits of safety reporting systems in health care--what lessons can we actually learn?绘制医疗安全报告系统的界限——我们能真正吸取什么教训?
Med J Aust. 2011 Jun 20;194(12):635-9. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03146.x.
2
Influence of attitudes on pharmacists' intention to report serious adverse drug events to the Food and Drug Administration.态度对药师向食品药品监督管理局报告严重药物不良事件意愿的影响。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Jul;72(1):143-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.03944.x.
3
Medication incidents reported to an online incident reporting system.
乌干达住院患者中与抗生素相关的疑似药物不良反应:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2017 Feb 17;5(2):e00298. doi: 10.1002/prp2.298. eCollection 2017 Apr.
4
A pre-postintervention study to evaluate the impact of dose calculators on the accuracy of gentamicin and vancomycin initial doses.一项干预前后研究,旨在评估剂量计算器对庆大霉素和万古霉素初始剂量准确性的影响。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 4;5(6):e006610. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006610.
向在线不良事件报告系统报告的药物不良事件。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 May;67(5):527-32. doi: 10.1007/s00228-010-0986-z. Epub 2011 Jan 15.
4
Critical incident reporting and learning.关键事件报告和学习。
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Jul;105(1):69-75. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq133.
5
The incidence and nature of prescribing and medication administration errors in paediatric inpatients.儿科住院患者处方和药物管理错误的发生率和性质。
Arch Dis Child. 2010 Feb;95(2):113-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.158485. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
6
Medication errors recovered by emergency department pharmacists.急诊科药师发现的用药错误。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jun;55(6):513-21. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.10.012. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
7
Prevalence, incidence and nature of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a systematic review.住院患者用药错误的发生率、发病率及性质:一项系统评价
Drug Saf. 2009;32(5):379-89. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200932050-00002.
8
Errors in administration of parenteral drugs in intensive care units: multinational prospective study.重症监护病房肠外用药管理中的差错:多国前瞻性研究。
BMJ. 2009 Mar 12;338:b814. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b814.
9
Predictors of medication errors among elderly hospitalized patients.老年住院患者用药错误的预测因素。
Am J Med Qual. 2008 Mar-Apr;23(2):115-27. doi: 10.1177/1062860607313143. Epub 2008 Feb 27.
10
Hospital staff should use more than one method to detect adverse events and potential adverse events: incident reporting, pharmacist surveillance and local real-time record review may all have a place.医院工作人员应采用多种方法来检测不良事件和潜在不良事件:事件报告、药剂师监测以及本地实时记录审查都可能发挥作用。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Feb;16(1):40-4. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.017616.