Suppr超能文献

增加中心容量是否会改善腹膜透析患者的预后?基于登记的队列研究和蒙特卡罗模拟研究。

Would increasing centre volumes improve patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis? A registry-based cohort and Monte Carlo simulation study.

机构信息

UMR-S 707, Inserm, Paris, France.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2013 Jun 20;3(6):e003092. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003092.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the association between centre volume and patient outcomes in peritoneal dialysis, explore robustness to residual confounding and predict the impact of policies to increase centre volumes.

DESIGN

Registry-based cohort study with probabilistic sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo simulation of (hypothetical) intervention effects.

SETTING

112 secondary-care centres in France.

PARTICIPANTS

9602 adult patients initiating peritoneal dialysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Technique failure (ie, permanent transfer to haemodialysis), renal transplantation and death while on peritoneal dialysis within 5 years of initiating treatment. Associations with underlying risk measured by cause-specific HRs (cs-HRs) and with cumulative incidence by subdistribution HRs (sd-HRs). Intervention effects measured by predicted mean change in cumulative incidences.

RESULTS

Higher volume centres had more patients with diabetes and were more frequently academic centres or associative groupings of private physicians. Patients in higher volume centres had a reduced risk of technique failure (>60 patients vs 0-10 patients: adjusted cs-HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.69), with no changed risk of death or transplantation. Sensitivity analyses mitigated the cs-HRs without changing the findings. In higher volume centres, the cumulative incidence was reduced for technique failure (>60 patients vs 0-10 patients: adjusted sd-HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.85) but was increased for transplantation and death (>60 patients vs 0-10 patients: transplantation-adjusted sd-HR 1.53; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.24; death-adjusted sd-HR 1.28; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.63). The predicted reduction in cumulative incidence of technique failure was largest under a scenario of shifting all patients to the two highest volume centre groups (0.091 reduction) but lower for three more realistic interventions (around 0.06 reduction).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients initiating peritoneal dialysis in high-volume centres had a considerably reduced risk of technique failure but simulations of interventions to increase exposure to high-volume centres yielded only modest improvements.

摘要

目的

评估中心容量与腹膜透析患者结局之间的关联,探讨对残余混杂因素的稳健性,并预测增加中心容量的政策的影响。

设计

基于登记的队列研究,对(假设的)干预效果进行概率敏感性分析和蒙特卡罗模拟。

设置

法国 112 个二级保健中心。

参与者

9602 名开始腹膜透析的成年患者。

主要结局测量指标

启动治疗后 5 年内技术失败(即永久性转至血液透析)、肾移植和腹膜透析期间死亡。使用特定原因的 HR(cs-HR)和亚分布 HR(sd-HR)测量与基础风险的关联。使用预测的累积发生率变化的干预效果。

结果

容量较高的中心有更多的糖尿病患者,且更常为学术中心或私人医生的联合团体。在容量较高的中心的患者技术失败风险较低(>60 名患者与 0-10 名患者:调整后的 cs-HR 0.46;95%CI 0.43 至 0.69),死亡或移植风险无变化。敏感性分析减轻了 cs-HR,但未改变结果。在容量较高的中心,技术失败的累积发生率降低(>60 名患者与 0-10 名患者:调整后的 sd-HR 0.49;95%CI 0.29 至 0.85),但移植和死亡的累积发生率增加(>60 名患者与 0-10 名患者:移植调整后的 sd-HR 1.53;95%CI 1.04 至 2.24;死亡调整后的 sd-HR 1.28;95%CI 1.00 至 1.63)。在将所有患者转移到两个最高容量中心组的情况下,预计技术失败的累积发生率降低最大(降低 0.091),但对于三个更现实的干预措施则降低较低(约 0.06 降低)。

结论

在高容量中心开始腹膜透析的患者技术失败的风险大大降低,但增加高容量中心暴露的干预措施的模拟仅产生适度的改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f04/3686247/db0b94fe8cf8/bmjopen2013003092f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验