• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿奇霉素治疗肺炎链球菌肺炎的生存预后:一项回顾性研究。

Azithromycin and survival in Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonia: a retrospective study.

机构信息

Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Division, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2013 Jun 20;3(6):e002898. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002898.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002898
PMID:23794577
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3686221/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP) represents a major pathogen in pneumonia. The impact of azithromycin on mortality in SP pneumonia remains unclear. Recent safety concerns regarding azithromycin have raised alarm about this agent's role with pneumonia. We sought to clarify the relationship between survival and azithromycin use in SP pneumonia.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Urban academic hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with a diagnosis of SP pneumonia (January-December 2010). The diagnosis of pneumonia required a compatible clinical syndrome and radiographic evidence of an infiltrate.

INTERVENTION

None.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Hospital mortality served as the primary endpoint, and we compared patients given azithromycin with those not treated with this. Covariates of interest included demographics, severity of illness, comorbidities and infection-related characteristics (eg, appropriateness of initial treatment, bacteraemia). We employed logistic regression to assess the independent impact of azithromycin on hospital mortality.

RESULTS

The cohort included 187 patients (mean age: 67.0±8.2 years, 50.3% men, 5.9% admitted to the intensive care unit). The most frequently utilised non-macrolide antibiotics included: ceftriaxone (n=111), cefepime (n=31) and moxifloxacin (n=22). Approximately two-thirds of the cohort received azithromycin. Crude mortality was lower in persons given azithromycin (5.6% vs 23.6%, p<0.01). The final survival model included four variables: age, need for mechanical ventilation, initial appropriate therapy and azithromycin use. The adjusted OR for mortality associated with azithromycin equalled 0.26 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.80, p=0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

SP pneumonia generally remains associated with substantial mortality while azithromycin treatment is associated with significantly higher survival rates. The impact of azithromycin is independent of multiple potential confounders.

摘要

目的

肺炎链球菌(SP)是肺炎的主要病原体。阿奇霉素对 SP 肺炎死亡率的影响尚不清楚。最近有关阿奇霉素的安全性问题引起了人们对该药物在肺炎治疗中作用的担忧。我们旨在明确 SP 肺炎患者生存与阿奇霉素使用之间的关系。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

城市学术医院。

参与者

2010 年 1 月至 12 月期间被诊断为 SP 肺炎的成年人。肺炎的诊断需要符合临床综合征,并伴有浸润性放射影像学证据。

干预措施

无。

主要和次要结局指标

住院死亡率为主要终点,我们比较了接受阿奇霉素治疗和未接受该治疗的患者。感兴趣的协变量包括人口统计学、疾病严重程度、合并症和感染相关特征(例如初始治疗的适当性、菌血症)。我们采用逻辑回归评估阿奇霉素对住院死亡率的独立影响。

结果

该队列包括 187 名患者(平均年龄:67.0±8.2 岁,50.3%为男性,5.9%收入重症监护病房)。最常使用的非大环内酯类抗生素包括:头孢曲松(n=111)、头孢吡肟(n=31)和莫西沙星(n=22)。约三分之二的患者接受了阿奇霉素治疗。接受阿奇霉素治疗的患者死亡率较低(5.6%比 23.6%,p<0.01)。最终的生存模型包括四个变量:年龄、需要机械通气、初始适当治疗和阿奇霉素使用。与阿奇霉素相关的死亡率调整后的 OR 为 0.26(95%CI 0.08 至 0.80,p=0.018)。

结论

SP 肺炎的死亡率仍然很高,而阿奇霉素治疗与显著更高的生存率相关。阿奇霉素的影响独立于多个潜在混杂因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d94e/3686221/37a54c198e59/bmjopen2013002898f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d94e/3686221/37a54c198e59/bmjopen2013002898f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d94e/3686221/37a54c198e59/bmjopen2013002898f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Azithromycin and survival in Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonia: a retrospective study.阿奇霉素治疗肺炎链球菌肺炎的生存预后:一项回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 Jun 20;3(6):e002898. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002898.
2
Pneumococal community-acquired pneumonia in the intensive care unit: Azithromycin remains protective despite macrolide resistance.
Respir Med. 2021 Feb;177:106307. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106307. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
3
Medical resource utilization among community-acquired pneumonia patients initially treated with levofloxacin 750 mg daily versus ceftriaxone 1000 mg plus azithromycin 500 mg daily: a US-based study.初始接受每日750毫克左氧氟沙星治疗与每日1000毫克头孢曲松加500毫克阿奇霉素治疗的社区获得性肺炎患者的医疗资源利用情况:一项美国的研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Apr;25(4):859-68. doi: 10.1185/03007990902779749.
4
Poor outcomes of empiric ceftriaxone ± azithromycin for community-acquired pneumonia caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.经验性使用头孢曲松±阿奇霉素治疗由甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌引起的社区获得性肺炎的效果不佳。
Intern Emerg Med. 2016 Jun;11(4):545-51. doi: 10.1007/s11739-015-1345-y. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
5
Clinical characteristics at initial presentation and impact of dual therapy on the outcome of bacteremic Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonia in adults.成人血行性肺炎链球菌肺炎初始表现的临床特征及双重治疗对其结局的影响
Can Respir J. 2004 Nov-Dec;11(8):589-93. doi: 10.1155/2004/461392.
6
Bacteremia in Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia: outcomes and epidemiology.金黄色葡萄球菌肺炎合并菌血症:结局与流行病学。
J Crit Care. 2011 Aug;26(4):395-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.09.002. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
7
The association of antibiotic treatment regimen and hospital mortality in patients hospitalized with Legionella pneumonia.抗生素治疗方案与军团菌肺炎住院患者的医院死亡率的相关性。
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jun 1;60(11):e66-79. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ157. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
8
[The clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children].[儿童大环内酯类耐药肺炎支原体肺炎的临床特征、治疗及转归]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2013 Oct;36(10):756-61.
9
Efficacy of β-Lactam-plus-Macrolide Combination Therapy in a Mouse Model of Lethal Pneumococcal Pneumonia.β-内酰胺类加大环内酯类联合疗法在致死性肺炎球菌肺炎小鼠模型中的疗效
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Sep 23;60(10):6146-54. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01024-16. Print 2016 Oct.
10
Azithromycin monotherapy for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: a 31/2-year experience from a veterans affairs hospital.阿奇霉素单药治疗社区获得性肺炎住院患者:一家退伍军人事务医院3.5年的经验
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jul 28;163(14):1718-26. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.14.1718.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Administering Intravenous Azithromycin within 7 Days of Hospitalization for Influenza Virus Pneumonia: A Propensity Score Analysis Using a Nationwide Administrative Database.静脉注射阿奇霉素对流感病毒肺炎住院 7 天内的影响:基于全国性行政数据库的倾向评分分析。
Viruses. 2023 May 10;15(5):1142. doi: 10.3390/v15051142.
2
Pharmacodynamic Target Assessment and PK/PD Cutoff Determination for Gamithromycin Against in Piglets.加米霉素对仔猪药效学靶点评估及药代动力学/药效学界值确定
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Jul 11;9:945632. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.945632. eCollection 2022.
3
Arsenic, antibiotics and interventions.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of two guideline-concordant antimicrobial combinations in elderly patients hospitalized with severe community-acquired pneumonia.比较两种符合指南的抗菌药物组合在老年重症社区获得性肺炎患者中的应用。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug;40(8):2310-4. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31825151a8.
2
Azithromycin and the risk of cardiovascular death.阿奇霉素与心血管死亡风险。
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 17;366(20):1881-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1003833.
3
Macrolide-based regimens and mortality in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
砷、抗生素与干预措施。
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;43(4):977-82. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu152.
4
Reducing the burden of acute respiratory distress syndrome: the case for early intervention and the potential role of the emergency department.减轻急性呼吸窘迫综合征的负担:早期干预的理由及急诊科的潜在作用。
Shock. 2014 May;41(5):378-87. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000142.
基于大环内酯类的治疗方案与住院社区获得性肺炎患者的死亡率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Aug;55(3):371-80. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis414. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
4
Macrolides vs. quinolones for community-acquired pneumonia: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.大环内酯类与喹诺酮类药物治疗社区获得性肺炎的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013 Apr;19(4):370-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03838.x. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
5
Effect of azithromycin on natural killer cell function.阿奇霉素对自然杀伤细胞功能的影响。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2012 May;13(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2012.02.013. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
6
Impact of guideline-concordant antibiotics and macrolide/β-lactam combinations in 3203 patients hospitalized with pneumonia: prospective cohort study.3203 例肺炎住院患者中指南一致的抗生素和大环内酯类/β-内酰胺类联合治疗的影响:前瞻性队列研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013 Mar;19(3):257-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03783.x. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
7
Immunomodulatory effects of macrolides during community-acquired pneumonia: a literature review.大环内酯类药物在社区获得性肺炎中的免疫调节作用:文献综述。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Mar;67(3):530-40. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr520. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
8
Validation of a clinical score for assessing the risk of resistant pathogens in patients with pneumonia presenting to the emergency department.评估急诊就诊肺炎患者中耐药病原体风险的临床评分的验证。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jan 15;54(2):193-8. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir813. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
9
Healthcare-associated pneumonia: the state of evidence to date.医疗机构相关性肺炎:现有证据的状况。
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2011 May;17(3):142-7. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e328343eb33.
10
Resistant pathogens in nonnosocomial pneumonia and respiratory failure: is it time to refine the definition of health-care-associated pneumonia?非医院获得性肺炎和呼吸衰竭中的耐药病原体:是否需要重新定义医疗保健相关性肺炎?
Chest. 2010 Jun;137(6):1283-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-2434. Epub 2010 Feb 12.