Suppr超能文献

髋关节置换术后,与钴铬合金头相比,氧化铝头的聚乙烯衬垫磨损减少 50%以上:43 髋的放射立体测量 10 年随访结果。

More than 50% reduction of wear in polyethylene liners with alumina heads compared to cobalt-chrome heads in hip replacements: a 10-year follow-up with radiostereometry in 43 hips.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Ringerike Hospital, Hønefoss, Norway.

出版信息

Acta Orthop. 2013 Aug;84(4):360-4. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.810516. Epub 2013 Jun 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Excessive wear of acetabular liners in hip replacements may lead to osteolysis and cup loosening. Different head materials are currently used. We measured differences in wear between alumina and cobalt-chrome heads with the same polyethylene liner.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

39 patients (43 hips) with osteoarthritis were included in a study with 10-year follow-up. Wear was measured as proximal and 3D penetration of the head in the liner with radiostereometry (RSA). All the patients were followed clinically with Harris hip score (HHS) for up to 10 years. Radiolucent lines and osteolytic lesions were assessed on plain radiographs.

RESULTS

With alumina heads, proximal wear (95% CI) after 10 years was 0.62 (0.44-0.80) mm as compared to 1.40 (1.00-1.80) mm in the cobalt-chrome group. For 3D wear, the results were 0.87 (0.69-1.04) mm for alumina heads and 1.78 (1.35-2.21) mm for cobalt-chrome heads. Median (range) HHS was 98 (77-100) in the alumina group and it was 93 (50-100) in the cobalt-chrome group (p = 0.01). We found no difference in osteolysis between the groups.

INTERPRETATION

We found better wear properties with alumina heads than with cobalt-chrome heads. We recommend the use of alumina heads in patients in whom a high wear rate might be anticipated.

摘要

背景与目的

髋关节置换术中髋臼衬垫过度磨损可导致骨溶解和杯松动。目前使用不同的头材料。我们测量了相同聚乙烯衬垫的氧化铝和钴铬头之间的磨损差异。

患者与方法

39 例(43 髋)骨关节炎患者纳入研究,随访 10 年。使用放射立体测量术(RSA)测量头在衬垫中的近端和 3D 穿透磨损。所有患者均进行了长达 10 年的临床随访,采用 Harris 髋关节评分(HHS)评估。在平片上评估透亮线和溶骨性病变。

结果

使用氧化铝头,10 年后近端磨损(95%CI)为 0.62(0.44-0.80)mm,而钴铬组为 1.40(1.00-1.80)mm。对于 3D 磨损,氧化铝头的结果为 0.87(0.69-1.04)mm,钴铬头为 1.78(1.35-2.21)mm。氧化铝组的中位数(范围)HHS 为 98(77-100),钴铬组为 93(50-100)(p=0.01)。我们在两组之间未发现骨溶解差异。

解释

我们发现氧化铝头的磨损性能优于钴铬头。我们建议在预计磨损率较高的患者中使用氧化铝头。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f943/3768034/5d3703eea92a/ORT-84-360-g001.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
Polyethylene wear rate and osteolysis: critical threshold versus continuous dose-response relationship.
J Orthop Res. 2005 May;23(3):520-5. doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.11.005. Epub 2005 Jan 19.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验